Are we heading for World War Three?
Sat 2:01 pm +00:00, 14 Oct 2023 6Israel’s war against Hamas risks drawing regional players into a wider conflict with repercussions far beyond the Middle East, security experts have warned.
With Israel expected to send ground troops into Gaza in response to Saturday’s deadly attacks on its territory and people, the issue now is how the confrontation escalates, said Miri Eisin, a retired colonel who worked in military intelligence and now runs a counter-terrorism institute at Reichman University in Israel. “Whether this will lead to a bigger war is the $64,000 question,” she told Fortune. “If Iran has a finger in this, do we now preempt against the next stage”?
The conflict comes with geopolitical tensions already running high, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and US-China relations at their worst for decades. Analysts at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute warned this summer that the world was “drifting into one of the most dangerous periods in human history”, with the number of operational nuclear warheads owned by major military powers rising in the past year to an estimated 12,512.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has “spent the past three decades sounding the alarm about Iran’s nuclear programme” and he has threatened to attack the country numerous times, but after Hamas’s assault on 7 October he “may finally be able to act on his threats”, said Al Jazeera
Netanyahu and his ministers “may have something very different in mind for the US deployment, that goes beyond military deterrence and political posturing”, said Al Jazeera. “He may try to widen the scope of the war to include Iran.”
Speaking to the Express in May, Brandon Weichert, geopolitical analyst and author of “The Shadow War: Iran’s Quest for Supremacy”, warned that the threat of a new world war was most likely to come from the Middle East.
“It will emanate from an Iran that is empowered by its allies in Beijing and Moscow,” he said, warning the US risks getting dragged into a new war at “precisely the moment it does not have the capability, resources, or will… to achieve victory in such a conflict”.
Pushed into a corner and potentially in open conflict with an Israel backed by the US would put an even greater spotlight on Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
After talks aimed at reviving the 2015 nuclear deal collapsed last year, fears have continued to grow that Iran’s “aggressive expansion” of its nuclear programme “risks triggering a regional war”, reported the Financial Times(FT).
Russia
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, has been described as “more dangerous than anything Europe has seen since the end of World War II”, said Politico.
Since then, Vladimir Putin’s losses have only “increased the chances” that the Russian president will “lash out and expand” the conflict, said The Wall Street Journal (WSJ).
In July Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president and now deputy secretary of its Security Council, warned against Nato members pledging further military aid to Kyiv. “The completely crazy West could not come up with anything else,” Medvedev wrote on Telegram. “In fact, it’s a dead end. World War Three is getting closer.”
Hamas’s attack on Israel has added yet another element to an already unstable picture. “It doesn’t take much strategic insight to join the dots between Gaza, Tehran and Moscow,” said The Telegraph. “The Russia-Iran axis, so horrifically manifested in this devastating assault against Israel as well as repeated war crimes against the Ukrainian population, symbolises a growing challenge for the West as emerging totalitarian alliances work to undermine the democratic order.”
China
The greatest threat to geopolitical stability has long been assumed to be the growing tensions between China and the US, who are “locked in an increasingly intense rivalry”, said The New York Times. The “rapid growth and modernisation” of China’s military has worried American onlookers, said the paper, with the US now having fewer military personnel and naval vessels.
Relations “dramatically escalated” last year after the then US House speaker Nancy Pelosi visited Taiwan, said CNN, souring further after China flew a giant balloon into US airspace.
It is the disputed island nation of Taiwan, which China claims sovereignty over, that is by the far the most dangerous flashpoint in a future regional conflict that could draw in the likes of the US.
In recent months there has been an attempt, led by Washington, to cool the hostile rhetoric and find common ground. However, analysts believe relations are so fraught that “re-establishing a semblance of stability and balance will take much more effort and political will”, said NPR, and will be “tested” by presidential elections in the US and Taiwan. “Mutual trust is running thin.”
North Korea
“Security dynamics in Northeast Asia have become increasingly volatile with China’s growing military threats and in the aftermath of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine,” said The Washington Post. North Korea has “drawn closer to Russia, while Japan’s relations with Russia have deteriorated”.
In July, North Korea detained a young US army soldier, Travis King, who crossed the border from South Korea without permission. The crisis came “during a particularly tense time with the North”, said BBC News.
The same month, the US sent a submarine with nuclear-armed ballistic missiles to South Korea for the first time in decades, prompting North Korea’s defence minister to warn that this could meet its legal conditions for use of nuclear weapons.
Artificial intelligence
Recent high-profile advances in artificial intelligence have led to increased fears that AI could accidentally cause a global conflict.
A leading academic at the University of Cambridge told the i news site in March that the technology could, in an extreme case, “mistake a bird as an incoming threat and trigger a nuclear launch if no human override is in place to assess alerts from an AI-assisted early-warning system”.
Although no state is openly attempting to automate its nuclear weapons systems, “integrating AI with command systems seems promising and even unavoidable”, said Peter Rautenbach from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
Not a normal source, but while walking today, it occurred to me that contrary to normal practice, the Israel/Gaza thing isn’t being handled well. It is being handled provocatively. I can only assume that this is deliberate policy, as it’s not their first rodeo.
It was started with a way too obvious FF, and videos of even Israelis claiming this abound. Are they trying to incite a bigger war, or even will a FF attack be made on Israel or on one of the Carriers in the Persian gulf.
Normally distractions eg a shooting in the UK etc to keep these things low key, but not this time. This must be policy.
Makes sense Ian
Have you also noticed that loads of their stories from Gaza are not accompanied by any actual evidence?
Paragliding Hamas. Grainy vids that could be anywhere
The dead festival goers, see Mathis latest. Plenty of dead cars but no verifiably dead people
The WhatsApp massacre confirmation. Simply ludicrous, what does WhatsApp prove, absolutely nothing. But it chimes with the WhatsApp generation I suppose
The recovered hostage bodies by Israeli soldiers from Gaza, top of the Beeb this morning. Small print says “according to Israel media”. That’s all right then, they always tell the truth don’t they – no they don’t! No bodies seen
Lots of images that look very photoshopped, see Mathis latest paper again
Lots of images that could have been taken another time, collapsed buildings etc. How do we know that they are current?
So, how do we know what is real and what isn’t? We don’t. I don’t trust the MSM one little bit. They always lie. It’s their default mode. The fact that Hamas is controlled by Israel adds to this scepticism. It was a FF at the start, so what else is false? And how can we be certain?
I don’t doubt a word you say Pete. Anything is possible, my feelings were purely based on the fact that they seem to be building the hype instead of dissipating it. Like you, I believe not a word I hear.
Yes Ian, the hype is rolling on and on
Certainly it’s all very convenient timing for the globalist reptiles. As a distraction from their Ukraine fiasco, the millions of immigrants flooding into the US and EU, their collapsing European economies, their toxic covid jabs, their collapsing monetary systems, etc etc
Then there is the usual resource grab, coastal Gaza gas fields that should at least be partially controlled from Gaza in a normal world
So one can’t help but wonder why the hype. And what’s next too. Whether this is all part of a bigger Middle Eastern gameplan to maintain our focus on the wrong things
I think that WW3 has already started but its not going to be a primarily kinetic conflict. Orwell told us how it will roll didn’t he. Control the media and the information flows, and so control the peoples minds
“Oceania had been at war with Eastasia and in alliance with Eurasia. But that was merely a piece of furtive knowledge which he happened to possess because his memory was not satisfactorily under control. Officially the change of partners had never happened. Oceania was at war with Eurasia: therefore Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia. The enemy of the moment always represented absolute evil, and it followed that any past or future agreement with him was impossible.”
Yes I agree. Very well put Pete, as always.
Cheers Ian