Triassic Period was a few thousand years old, not 200 million, and lasted a couple of days
Sun 10:50 pm +00:00, 8 Oct 2023 3The red bed is boiled up body parts. The Great Flood was a super heated flood which boiled the flesh off creatures turning the ground to red mud. Above the red bed are the grey clays. Above those are the parts of the creatures which did not boil off, 50 times more full of silicon than the red bed. Above that the black cap. If Roger is correct, the whole Triassic Period lasted a couple of days, not thousands of years as claimed by ‘science’, and not hundreds of millions of years ago either, but just a few thousand.
What does that do to all the claims about dinosaurs? Has Roger got any ideas about that? Was that all just another great fake?
A reexamination of Immanuel Velikovsky’s controversial Venus theories in light of new astronomical and archaeological findings * Provides new evidence from recent space probe missions to support Velikovsky’s theories on the formation of Venus * Presents recently translated ancient texts from China, Korea, and Japan that uphold the cometlike descriptions of Venus cited by Velikovsky * Examines evidence of major geomagnetic events in 1500 BCE and 750 BCE that correspond with close passes of the comet Venus and its impact with Mars * Offers scientific explanations for many disputed aspects of Velikovsky’s theories, such as how Venus could have transformed from a comet into an orbiting planet Surrounded by controversy even before its publication in 1950, Immanuel Velikovsky’s Worlds in Collision introduced the provocative theory that Venus began as a brilliant comet ejected by Jupiter around 1600 BCE, wreaking chaos on Mars and Earth as it roamed through our solar system prior to settling into its current orbit. Immediately dismissed without any investigation and subject to vicious attacks, Velikovsky’s theory is now poised for reexamination in light of recent astronomical and archaeological findings. Exploring the key points of Velikovsky’s theories, Laird Scranton presents evidence from recent space probe missions to show that Venus still exhibits cometlike properties, such as its atmospheric composition, and could be a young planet. Reviewing the widespread cometlike descriptions of Venus from 1500 BCE to 750 BCE as well as Velikovsky’s observation that no records of Venus exist prior to 1600 BCE, Scranton reveals recently translated ancient texts from China, Korea, and Japan that further uphold Velikovsky’s theories. Examining evidence of major geomagnetic and climate-change events around 1500 BCE and 750 BCE, corresponding with close passes of the comet Venus and its impact with Mars, the author offers scientific explanations for many disputed aspects of Velikovsky’s theories, such as how Venus transformed from a comet into an orbiting planet. By updating this unresolved controversy with new scientific evidence, Scranton helps us to understand how it was that Worlds in Collision was the one book found open on Albert Einstein’s desk at the time of his death.
https://www.amazon.com/Velikovsky-Heresies-Collision-Catastrophes-Revisited-ebook/dp/B00770DLNY/ref=sr_1_fkmr2_1?crid=5SH0Q0YFP7V3&keywords=The+Velikovsky+Heresis&qid=1696842188&s=digital-text&sprefix=the+velikovsky+heresis%2Cdigital-text%2C150&sr=1-1-fkmr2
Gen 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
“without form, and void”. = Tohu va Bohu in Hebrew.
Tohu va Bohu Signifies Confusion and Void – A Horrible State to Be In.
https://theexplanation.com/tohu-va-bohu-signifies-confusion-and-void-a-horrible-state-to-be-in/
Thanks Gordon, very interesting. I am currently reading Ages in Chaos, Velikovsky’s magnus opus where he covers the political and social aspects of those times. rather than the astronomical
I’ve just started, but the introduction states that there are very likely significant extra years in the official historical timelines. Which hide the real connections between the Egyptian and Hebrew records
Fascinating stuff and very convincing too. Velikovsky was a very impressive intellect. And his vilification is standard practice against heretics who are not refutable by logic and data isn’t it. Ad Hominem is the standard method for those that are losing the argument. We see that all the time, even here on Tap occasionally, c’est la vie