Welcome to the Tap Blog - The Home for Media Sceptics

The blog that’s fed by the readers. Please send in the news and stories that you think are of interest to an awakened audience. Read more...

8 Responses to “Vaxxed are no longer Human.”

  1. 4 Oct 2023 13:17
    pete fairhurst 2 says:

    Blimey!

    Not really a surprise given the current madness, but it would be good to see exactly where that is written down and enacted. He implies that US statute over rules other States in this instance. I wonder, how does that work exactly. Theoretically us Brits are subject to UK statute law not US

    Hi Ian, hope you are well
    Best
    Pete

    • 4 Oct 2023 17:06
      ian says:

      Hi Pete, yes good Mate. Not sure of anything re what the guy claimed. It seemed possible to me purely because the vaxx will have altered their DNA, which perhaps ? renders them as not original which was human.

      I fully understand that this is purely hypothesis, and I’m as far from a lawyer as you could be.

  2. 4 Oct 2023 16:40
    newensign says:

    Without full disclosure Ian, the claim is constructive fraud and therefore null and void except if enforced down the barrel of a gun!

    • 4 Oct 2023 17:08
      ian says:

      Hi N’, I’ll take your your word for it. See my reply to Pete’ too, as that was all I was going on.

  3. 5 Oct 2023 13:47
    RobbingHood says:

    Apparently they’ve got rid of the live document from the government website but the Wayback Machine has a copy https://web.archive.org/web/20131207065558/https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_1b7d.pdf

    Doesn’t mention anything about transhumanism, though I guess it could be implied from it.

    Full twatter thread can be read without logging on at https://nitter.net/karma44921039/status/1705177252952998141 , same goes for any twatter URL, just replace twitter.com with nitter.net

    • 5 Oct 2023 15:36
      pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Thanks RobbingHood

      I’ve looked at the document and, with the massive caveat that I’m an ignoramus on the technicalities of both US law and synthetic DNA/mRNA etc etc then, I can’t see how it backs up the claims made in the vid

      Certainly there isn’t a great deal of reference to mRNA in the Court document but what there is doesn’t confirm anything. I just can’t tell for certain but I can’t see any affirmation

      Thanks for the twatter/nitter.net info too

    • 5 Oct 2023 18:43
      ian says:

      Thanks R’, it, as you say can be implied from it. Not clear though. On another tack, a good friend who fell out with me over the clot shot, has come round finally and apologised, but only after his wife and him got the booster a week ago, and have both been ill since. It’s beyond belief for many, that their Doctors, governments and TV would would club together to kill them.

      • 6 Oct 2023 10:18
        RobbingHood says:

        Sad that it takes something as serious as that to see what seemed obvious to some of us from the start. I’ve had no apologies from the people that I upset with my comments, and I upset a few. That said, I don’t expect or want any, and am quite happy being the nutjob in the corner.

        On another note though, I keep seeing posts on social media about speed cameras and ANPR/ULEZ cameras being ‘downgraded’ so maybe there is hope that the general population is starting to wake up at last.