Crater Earth and The Galactic Scam

There’s deep, very deep and then there’s the Godgevlamste research.

Recently banned from YouTube Godgevlamste has uploaded his work to Rumble. In many years of watching, listening and learning this guy’s work is some of the best I have seen.

Watch with an open mind.

https://rumble.com/user/Godgevlamste

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER
Get the latest Tap posts emailed to you daily

23 Responses to “Crater Earth and The Galactic Scam”

  1. Tapestry says:

    I am keeping an open mind John but I don’t hear a coherent message. I think you need a video for beginners. Which one would you suggest? The main issue for me is to hear what does he mean by crater earth.

  2. John says:

    He’s still uploading all of his videos Tap. Once done I’ll look for one that gives an overview. Basically the premise is we’re actually on the moon. The earth as we know it would be located in a crater on the moon with a plasma dome or similar over it. I’m not saying I for one believe it all but I am fascinated by his research and it feels very credible to me. In this time of great change anything is possible.

  3. Tapestry says:

    I am nearly getting my head around the dragons and the giants but this one is way beyond what I can currently fathom. I find it easier when there are many different bodies of evidence pointing in the same direction, and I like written evidence or things recorded in the past. If evidence presented is all video, such things are so easy to manipulate. But I will keep looking. As regards the moon, that is certainly a topic with many reasons to wonder how it got there.

    • John says:

      I’m with you Tap. This is off the scale stuff. It’s either crazy or true and the level to which we have been lied to is off the scale. I have to take it in slowly to process it and try and fit it in to my current belief model.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Me too. The moon is certainly very very convenient, and has some amazing synchronistic characteristics, for humans

      This book is fascinating but incomplete I feel

      • pete fairhurst 2 says:

        Oops

        • John says:

          I read this years ago Pete and believed every word. Not now though. Even though it says the moon is not what we think it still suggests the moon is physical. I’m starting to lean towards the model of the moon being a reflection of the greater earth. As always beliefs and views can and do change but currently the moon not being solid sounds right to me.

          Vibes of Cosmos in another YouTube channel well worth looking at.

          https://www.youtube.com/@VIBESOFCOSMOS/videos

          • pete fairhurst 2 says:

            Thanks John. That book implies that it’s not a sphere, more a reflector, if I recall. But it doesn’t go as far as you do!

            I’ve got plenty to keep me fascinated just now. What with Pierre, mudfossil and Godgevlamaste too

            Will look at maybe adding VofC to my list too, thanks again

            Life is a never ending voyage of discovery. Or at least it should be

              • pete fairhurst 2 says:

                Thanks John, I will have a look

                • pete fairhurst 2 says:

                  Wow John, wow! That is some theory

                  I don’t know enough about plasma but I was intrigued by that short vid. Intrigued enough to keep going onto number 3 anyway. And more if I’m still open minded about this

                  Next question for me is how is the day only 24 hours in this model?

                  Will let you know what I think in due course

                  For others: the first 2 vids are both short at 4 and 8 minutes and easily understandable too. Go to his very first download

                • pete fairhurst 2 says:

                  He answered my 24 hour day question in vid 3

                  I’m up to vid 5 now John and I’m becoming more and more intrigued. He is showing some amazing stuff and I’m hooked now. There are 54 Crater Earth vids so it’s early days but wow….

                  If anyone else has a look and finds a fundamental flaw then please alert me

              • Tapestry says:

                My head can’t do it. The problem for me is the evidence from the Electric Universe site thunderbolts.info
                They can’t both be right. Also mud fossil university runs against the grain of the Crater Earth approach. The voice over of Crater Earth is professional and the visuals are Hollywood grade. Mudfossil Roger Sporrs keeps on coming up with more convincing material. It’s really interesting to think about. He’s not a professional actor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKO8Wi5yK_s

  4. pete fairhurst 2 says:

    If you start at vid 1 on Godgevlamaste Tap and work up then you will be rewarded. I’m up to 7 now and my mind has been blown, as we used to say back in the day

    Forget the crater bit when you start and focus on the correlation between the “moon” and the “cosmos”. His evidence is stunning

    In vids 5 or 6 he gives you evidence for what Saturn really is, Stonehenge too

    As a final incentive for you he talks about some of the same “constellations” that Pierre Sabak does too, Pleiades, Taurus and Sirius. He shows you what he thinks that they really are as well. He has a pleasant voice too ;-))

    The first few vids will not be a massive investment of your time and, if you do watch them then, I would highly value your opinion. I’m stunned at the moment and don’t quite know what to think

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Also, Mudfossil and Godgevlamaste are not necessarily mutually exclusive either. If Godgevalmaste is correct about the size of our planet then massive creatures could well exist/have existed here

      I’ve not seen enough of either yet to be certain about that but, from what I’ve seen so far then, that holds

      Not speaking for Electric/Thunderbolts, I
      don’t know enough about them

      • Tapestry says:

        Anything on the moon would be interesting. Link?

        • pete fairhurst 2 says:

          01-is the moon the reflection of a gigantic earth
          https://rumble.com/v38eduz-01-is-the-moon-the-reflection-of-a-gigantic-earth.html

          02-the earth is a reflection of earth -part two ( black sun ,polaris)
          https://rumble.com/v38eegr-02-the-earth-is-a-reflection-of-earth-part-two-black-sun-polaris.html

          03-The moon is a reflection of a gigantic earth , final proof !!!
          https://rumble.com/v38eivf-03-the-moon-is-a-reflection-of-a-gigantic-earth-final-proof-.html

          All on page 3 of his playlist

          • newensign says:

            That is my understanding of it Pete, the black sun only picking out land mass like an X-ray machine. Hence in day time one can see blue sky behind the moon. People don’t recognise the earth continents reflected, because they have been distorted to fit the globe model! The enemy had to invent the global spinning ball, as such is easier to fit their false science that there is no creator and it all happened by accident from a big bang! A flat earth within a large crater with a dome can’t be explained away so easily as non created by intelligent design.

            • John says:

              They also concocted the Earth’s 23.4 degree tilt to hide the fact we’re in a small cordoned off section of the plane. We’re not in the centre. 8 billion people rapidly waking up to the fact their whole lives may have been a deception and their true divinity hidden. That is not going to end well. Does the covid plandemic, the cashless society, the surveillance state and the rapidly emerging prison planet make sense now? Steiner’s comments on vaccinating god out of us also make much sense with an awakening in mind.

              • newensign says:

                Yes John, they give themselves away with the numbers such as the invented tilt ie 23.4 = 9 – add 23.4 + 66.6 = 90 (Degrees of a right angle) 9 + 9 (noughts ignored) = 99 another favourite number. Also 99 is 11 x 9 – 11 being the biblical name of Gog who would come and take a great spoil from us – the little horn – not the Pope, although he is part of the beast system. I did post a few days back an article of Steiner on how dangerous LED lights were. That is an interesting clock – is it the Prage one?

                • John says:

                  It is although I don’t think it’s in the original form. I think it’s been altered.

            • pete fairhurst 2 says:

              Thanks newensign, your comment encourages me to watch more. His model is slightly different though, a much much larger Earth, that is still a massive globe, but our “Earth” is “flat” and contained within a crater on the much bigger globe

              It sounds mad but the correlation between the “cosmos” and the “craters” on the “moon” that he demonstrates is mind blowing. Particularly if you come to this cold like I did. I’m still stunned and collecting my thoughts tbh, which is why I’ve not posted anything

              It is contra to all my previous astronomy learning, not an awful lot I admit, but I did think that I understood the basics. Seems not if he is correct, so I am collecting my thoughts now, which might take some time! 🙂

              • newensign says:

                I don’t think anyone knows the precise nature of the universe, only that the Global Theory does not add up Pete!. From what I gather we are in a crater on a huge plain, hence the name planet – a small part of a much larger plain!