Welcome to the Tap Blog - The Home for Media Sceptics

The blog that’s fed by the readers. Please send in the news and stories that you think are of interest to an awakened audience. Read more...

5 Responses to “A long detailed post, so here is the link; read through to the very end. Relate this to a recent comment from Tap re the book he is reading…..”

  1. 16 Jul 2023 14:13
    ian says:

    An excellen post D’.

  2. 16 Jul 2023 14:41
    pete fairhurst 2 says:

    Gates is another fraud who made his so called billions by aristocratic promotion. Certainly not by any merit. Nothing about his can be considered real

    Given how often he is promoted by mainstream and alternative media then, I am deeply suspicious about his real role too. He’s an official boogyman in the alt media isn’t he? That is not an accident, the alternative media is as tightly controlled as the mainstream in reality

    See this from 2017:
    http://mileswmathis.com/gates.pdf
    It’s heavy on genealogies as usual. But a quick skim should suffice

    “So what does it all mean? In my educated opinion, it means that the Gates Foundation, Bill Gates, and
    Microsoft itself are all fronts for the Matrix. Like Apple Computers and Steve Jobs, they don’t exist like we think. Microsoft would appear to be another big government entity, like Google, with a person from the families simply chosen to front it. Gates is sold to us as a genius of some sort, but I have never seen the least evidence of that. He comes across as a big dope who can barely follow the
    Teleprompter or the earpiece. He is marginally more presentable than George Bush or Donald Trump, but that isn’t saying much. He has all the charisma of a tunafish sandwich left out in the rain. Which indicates he wasn’t chosen for his personal qualities. He was chosen because he had to be chosen. He is a child of the richest families and demanded his “due”. These kids want to be famous, and Daddy can’t say no. The only question is, will they become famous in art, cinema, politics, sports or themedia? Cinema and sports were out, and you couldn’t sell Gates as an artist. That left the outer reaches of the media, where Gates could be installed as a sometimes speaker and important person, without anyone ever catching on. Installing him as the front for Microsoft was a coup for his handlers,
    since it made that company look private: not connected to the military/industrial/spy complex. And
    scrubbing his genealogy hid the fact the company was closely tied to the usual families. It also allowed for the creation of the Gates Foundation, by which they could channel money to Africa, Israel, or
    anywhere else in the world, under the cover of a charitable foundation. But there is nothing charitable about it. It was always just a clever form of money laundering, and you can be sure every dollar spent is an investment with a huge guaranteed return and no tax. Same as all other charitable foundations.”

    • 16 Jul 2023 15:12
      ian says:

      Great comment Pete. Just a little point to add. Whilst I never follow MSM now at all, I noticed a Katie Hopkins Youtube channel. She seems not too bad in real life, or as real life as youtube is. My wife watches her videos and I can hear them, and boy does she slate most TV personalities. She used to work with some of them, and I’ve never heard her utter a kind word about any of them. The whole shit show, is just smoke and mirrors.

  3. 16 Jul 2023 15:38
    pete fairhurst 2 says:

    “The whole shit show, is just smoke and mirrors.”

    Yes Ian. It is impossible to be certain about anything in any media. All media is, at root, a false representation by vested interests. It’s just images on an artificial screen, words in the ether or words on a page

    “Let me take you down
    ‘Cause I’m going to strawberry fields
    Nothing is real
    And nothing to get hung about
    Strawberry fields forever

    Living is easy with eyes closed
    Misunderstanding all you see
    It’s getting hard to be someone but it all works out
    It doesn’t matter much to me”

    Lyrics attributed to “the Beatles” but how can we ever really know for sure about that? It’s just as likely that the words are from some Tavistock operative who was working for the Matrix

    • 16 Jul 2023 19:23
      ian says:

      Yes I’ve read that Pete, but I particularly like John Lennon’s rebelliousness. I bought his album, Can’t remember the name, but it had songs reminiscent of Beatles songs. He seemed to be too risky to be allowed to live.