The Lobby

There was robust discussion during UK Column News Extra 16.06.2023 regarding RFK Jr.’s apparent submission to ‘them again’… this is the interview that sparked the discussion:


Perhaps RFK Jr. could be Trump’s VP?


7 Responses to “The Lobby”

  1. NPP says:

    RFK, Jr. makes a distinction without a difference and removes himself from serious consideration by avoiding the fundamental political issue of our day when asked about American support and funding of Israel, i.e., the question: do Jewish interests control our government? What say you @RobertKennedyJr?

  2. ian says:

    I suspect he wouldn’t have gotten even this far without being controllable.

  3. pete fairhurst 2 says:

    Agreed both

    Shame but there it is. He’s from the families, what else did anyone expect

  4. Tapestry says:

    Don’t charge machine gun nests head on. As Tucker said taboo subjects are altered by powerful interests. Go past their well entrenched machine gun nests and take them from the flanks or the rear. Kennedy wants afree speech and democracy to survive unlike Obama, Clinton and Biden. Trump is pro-vaxx. Pro-war. You have your choice and you will select wrongly by not understanding the game. Kennedy’s family has history of being anti-war, pro-democracy and anti-corruption, anti-CIA. He’s a very brave man.

    • NPP says:

      JFK Jr. is a much anticipated hope.
      His comments re ZOG are despicable; same old same old. Trump was equally disappointing.
      I’ll tell you when we all deem him our success.
      The bar is so low here, there, in the collective West generally.

  5. pete fairhurst 2 says:

    Some good points there, but you’ve got more faith in the US “democratic” system than I have Tap

    Recent Presidential elections have been gerrymandered, I’ve no doubt about that. See numerous Mathis analyses, he shows that pretty categorically. The “no audit trail” voting machines are an easy way for them, they can create overnight votes at the flick of a switch

    In 2020 there were massive vote dumps for old dead eyes in the middle of the night. In key States too which did the trick for him. Never mind the individual votes that went “wrong”

    This is how they gerrymandered senile Joe into place. The vote tallies expected us to believe that that old dead eyes was far more popular, and got far more votes, even than Obama last time out! Which is patently ridiculous, Joe couldn’t run the proverbial in a brewery, and everybody could see that

    Further evidence: Trump drew massive audiences to his rallies with a large and enthusiastic following, old Joe couldn’t fill a broom cupboard. Ditto Twitter following. The Donald was infinitely more popular than dead eyes. But the gerrymandered numbers say he still lost, it’s pure farce

    And then there was the gerrymandering of the Primaries last time out too. Old Joe was fixed up there as well, Bernie Sanders was an infinitely more popular candidate but somehow he lost. The Primaries are easy to fix it seems

    In a fair fight then, old dead eyes would have fallen in the first round. He was sometimes an incoherent idiot even then, and things have clearly taken a turn for the worse for him. But we are expected to believe that he saw off both Bernie and the Donald on merit. I don’t buy it for one second

    So how can we trust anything about US “democracy”? We can’t, I certainly don’t

    And all the above doesn’t even address whether the President has ANY real power when he gets to the White House. Mathis has shown, over and over, that the President is purely a PR position for actors, who have no real power

    Everything about US history is fake, everything. Scratch the surface and the shiny gloss immediately flakes off revealing the dull lie underneath