Tap News

5 Responses to “WACO: THE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT (1997)”

  1. 21 Apr 2023 7:55 AM
    ian says:

    A blast from the past. I haven’t watched it all yet, and I recall that members of Koresh’s Branch Davidians were witnessing the planes flying cocaine into a local military base, Possibly the Clintons were mentioned. Let’s see if that gets a mention.

  2. 21 Apr 2023 12:17 PM
    pete fairhurst 2 says:

    I didn’t watch this, I’m corrupted by Mathis ;-))

    Here is his take from 2018, funnily enough reposted today:

    http://mileswmathis.com/waco.pdf

    • 21 Apr 2023 12:20 PM
      pete fairhurst 2 says:

      “But not so fast. In this day and age, we are no longer as gullible. Some of us question our designated role as consumers of media productions that pretend to help us understand the world we live in. Luckily, those of us who are old enough to remember 1993 can now, potentially, add a quarter of a century of experience in critical thinking to our view of the Waco drama.

      It´s time to rethink the Waco terror—and the way it unfolded, apparently, before our very eyes—to grasp its innovative format as one of the latest and most successful psychopolitical TV reality shows for a global audience. Hopefully, this will help us to finally debrief
      and process what a terror incident can actually do to us. It´s time to scrutinize the Waco drama just as we would any other psychological terror operation. The title of this exposé, Life after Waco, has a double meaning in that we are trying to wake up from the Waco nightmare,
      while also providing food for the imagination of a much more happy ending to the Waco drama. Yes, I will show nobody died and nobody got hurt and no children were abused at Mt.
      Carmel.”

    • 21 Apr 2023 1:45 PM
      ian says:

      Thanks Pete, I’ll read the MM article later. I was of the opinion which I got somewhere at the time of the event, that Koresh and his crew were aware that the Clintons I believe, or at least the USAF were fling in planeloads of Cocaine into the military base next to Waco, and the attack was to take out the witnesses. If however MM can show that no-one was killed, then what I believe is bollocks. I’ll read it later Pete, thanks for the heads up.

      • 21 Apr 2023 2:13 PM
        pete fairhurst 2 says:

        No worries Ian

        The Clintons/cocaine background is fairly well documented from what I remember. The airport in question was somewhere in rural Arkansas, Mena rings a bell. It is just 84 miles from the Texan border, 342 from Waco

        Clinton is fake too according to Mathis [they always are according to him]

        Lewinsky and Clinton:
        http://mileswmathis.com/lewin.pdf

        More Clinton:
        http://mileswmathis.com/rich.pdf