Humanity’s real enemy – the World Economic Forum.

I think you can better understand how deeply a country has been captured is by how advanced the implementation of the WEF agenda is there.

China has been on the forefront with it: it already has digital IDs, digital yuan, social credit system, etc.

You cannot even get on the internet in China (as heavily censored it is anyway) without the facial ID.

Rothschilds also have one of their most extensive financial networks there.Russian central bank is answerable only to the IMF (fully captured by Rothschilds).

Plandemic policies there were also quite severe. They faltered only thanks to Russian people’s mass refusal to comply despite all the efforts by the government.

While I think Russian military operation in Ukraine is righteous from Russia’s point of view, humanity’s real fight is with the WEF/ UN agendas that want us own nothing, eat roaches and be happy little slaves.

Ella Moss

picture from Ned Pamphilon.  Are you on either list?

How about Poland – video from Sonja Van Ende showing arms build-up in Poland.  Somehow you know such massive forces are not being readied just to send them home again,  SIgn up to and click on link.  Or link to Sonja Van Ende on vk.

Get the latest Tap posts emailed to you daily

7 Responses to “Humanity’s real enemy – the World Economic Forum.”

  1. NPP says:

    I seem to be a Baddie!

  2. NPP says:

    Dare I suggest the enemy is ourselves?

    WEF, UN Agenda2023, WHO, the UK Government Of Occupation…. if we merely say no, if enough of us do not follow the instruction, the WEF et al have no power.

  3. Tapestry says:

    You’re the baddest boy in Thetford area, NPP. And the best cartoonist in the country.

    • NPP says:

      Robin Tilbrook was on GBNews Mark Dolan. It was a very rare thing for me to turn on the TV, had a roaring fire on the go, turned on GBNews & there came Robin.

      • Tapestry says:

        Me too. I watched GBN from 9.20. Robin was scheduled from 10.15pm. Dolan was taken aback by the strength of his arguments, and had to usher him off after a brief encounter, frightened he might offend his royal patron by sympathising with English Independence in any way. He said Robin could come back on again some time. Let’s see if the powers that be can permit such a thing. The main media won’t carry the Teds at all. It’s such a simple argument. Westminster wants England broken up into regions. If the choice is to be broken up or to be independent then go for Independence every time. The saving to the Exchequer would be in the order of £2000 for each man, woman and child each year, three times more than the saving from Brexit.

        • NPP says:

          I’m ambivalent about UK or indie England. I do want to live in peace & security. Anything is better than GOO: Govt. Of Occupation. Robin offers ideas & solutions. If Nippy Sturgeon & the Welsh mob can discuss independence, why can’t TED?

          TED could do with some women spokespersons. Could Robin talk to/be interviewed by Dominique Samuels?

          • Tapestry says:

            Robin is always off the scale compared to other politicians – all from the heart and researched beyond the reach of interviewer’s questions. That’s why he doesn’t get invited on very often. Don’t be sexist Ned. It’s not your thing. As for indepndent England, just think of the tax cuts.