Dr.Vernon Coleman: There Has Been a Global Coup

The covid-19 fraud was devised with a purpose; it was part of a plan which started in earnest back in the 1960s when a group of people met and agreed that the world was overcrowded.

By Dr. Vernon Coleman

PART ONE 30Th March 2023

There has been a global coup.

The covid-19 fraud was devised with a purpose; it was part of a plan which started in earnest back in the 1960s when a group of people met and agreed that the world was overcrowded. They decided to cut the size of the population down to a level last seen in the middle of the 17th century.

Some of the people who decided this were very rich. A Mr Rothschild, a Mr Rockefeller and some other bankers. And some of the plotters worked for a big, international, left wing organisation called the United Nations.

It seems a strange mixture of capitalist bankers and commie bureaucrats but you have to remember that there is no discernible difference between fascism and communism – so they got on well together.

This strange bunch of evil people decided that they needed something with which they could scare the living daylights out of the world’s population; a threat, a danger that would enable them to persuade billions to accept a totalitarian world government and a smaller global population.

It was suggested that a good war would be a good idea. Wars have always been popular with despots. They give a chance to introduce lots of new laws and there’s the added side effect that millions of people can be killed off.

But the conspirators then decided that a war wasn’t the best idea they could come up – to start with at any rate. For one thing, controlling a war is always tricky. There’s always the risk that some mad general might forget who had made the rules. Besides, wars tend to end and they really don’t kill enough people. They needed something big that would enable them to terrify the life out of everyone – particularly the younger generation. They needed a threat that would provide a massive distraction so that when they were ready to introduce a global war, the people would be ready to accept anything. They needed to find a spokesperson for the children; a Joan of Arc like figure, someone who could speak out on behalf of millions of children and who could paint a picture of a gloomy future and a dying planet. She (and it would have to be a she) would need to be someone small in stature, someone easy to portray as a victim and someone easy to `sell’ as a child (and therefore beyond criticism) even when she was no longer a child.

And they came up with Greta and global warming.

Global warming wasn’t a new idea, it had been around for generations, but it had everything they needed. And it was a way to make people feel so guilty that they would do anything they were told to do.

Global warming offered the conspirators – the bankers, the United Nations and a bunch of politicians, clerics, billionaires and miscellaneous megalomaniacs who had been recruited (with the promise of more power and money than they had dreamt of) – a chance to change everything, and to make those changes permanent; an excuse to introduce hundreds of new laws that would have never normally been accepted; and a chance to terrify people around the world so much that they would do anything they were told to do – and, moreover, do it willingly and enthusiastically.

The conspirators tried out their plan by introducing a concept called recycling. They told everyone that the world was running out of cornflake boxes and yoghurt cartons and that the coming shortages would only be avoided if everyone sorted their rubbish into lots of different boxes and bags every week.

Recycling was, of course, only ever intended as an exercise in forcing people to become obedient and compliant. The boxes, and pots and other rubbish which people wasted time sorting out were just taken to poorer countries and either burnt or dumped in the street. A vast amount of drinking water was wasted washing out bottles and jars.

When the global warming scam and the recycling nonsense were clearly working well, the conspirators decided that they’d better change the name of the scam to `climate change’ because that gave them more chances to blame people for bad weather.

The phrase climate change enabled them to blame the people if there was a storm, a fire, a heat wave or a tsunami. They started fiddling the weather reports and giving names to breezes and other bits of weather so that people would take every threat very seriously.

Moreover, they also decided that they needed something else to spice things up a little.

The global warming scam was fine for the long-term but it wasn’t quite scary enough. They needed a threat with which they could terrify everyone into doing exactly what they were told to do.

They decided that some sort of pandemic would do nicely.

Back in the 1980s, they started off with AIDS but I had a lot of readers at the time and managed to destroy the myth that AIDS was going to kill us all so they tried various different types of flu, honing their plan with each new threat.

By late 2019, the baddies were getting desperate. Some of the leaders of the evil conspiracy weren’t getting any younger. And they needed to get on with the Great Reset and the New World Order, appoint themselves to the new world government and turn their power into billions and billions of dollars for themselves.

So they decided that they’d use the ordinary flu of that winter as a major threat to mankind. Hitchcock would have called it the McGuffin – the slightly absurd but superficially believable reason for everything that was to follow.

They made up some puerile nonsense about bats and a lab in China and hired arguably the most incompetent forecaster in history to come up with some outrageous forecasts. The mathematician they chose, Neil Ferguson, did them proud, producing astonishingly absurd predictions that made absolutely no sense at all to anyone who examined them closely. These crazy forecasts dominated thinking around the world and were reproduced ad nauseam in the media. It was clearly nonsense, and in mid-March 2020 I made a video calling it the coronavirus hoax. The official figures simply made no sense at all. And everyone seemed to have forgotten that WHO figures show that the flu can kill 650,000 people worldwide in a single six month flu season. In that first video I predicted that the plan was to kill old people, to introduce mandatory vaccination, to get rid of cash (regarded as a nuisance by banks) and to reduce the global population.

At this point, their plan very nearly all went wrong.

PART TWO 31St March 2023

In March 2020, a group of scientists appointed to advise the British Government looked carefully at this new threat and decided that it was no more dangerous than the annual flu. So they officially downgraded it! The proof is on my websites. (They were right, too. The UK Government’s own figures prove that the flu for 2018 and 2019 was three times as lethal as covid-19.

If the evil ones hadn’t had the foresight to buy the world’s mainstream media this would have been disastrous. The pandemic would have ended overnight.

But the TV stations and the newspapers ignored the experts’ decision that covid-19 was just an over-promoted, rebranded version of the flu and obediently cheered wildly when governments announced that they were giving themselves massive new powers to deal with this threat. Newspapers and TV were, of course, bought with huge quantities of taxpayers’ money.

It was the suppression of this simple truth, together with the suppression of all associated facts, the refusal to debate and the demonization of myself and other truth-tellers which proved to me beyond doubt that this was a serious fraud; a global coup. Never before in history have scientists not been allowed to debate a scientific issue. The BBC’s stated policy was not to allow anyone questioning vaccination to be heard. The BBC produces propaganda not news.

Miraculously, governments around the world managed to find similar, 360-page plans for dealing with this sort of a `fake’ pandemic sitting in a drawer. The new plans removed old-fashioned fripperies such as freedom and democracy and replaced them with totalitarian regimes with more power than Stalin ever dreamt of.

The plan to save us all from a disease which had inconveniently been officially categorised as no more dangerous than the flu, included the introduction of medically pointless global lockdowns. As a result, individuals were imprisoned in their homes, the elderly were prevented from seeing their relatives, schools were closed, essential government departments were closed and hospital departments and GP surgeries offered a dramatically reduced service.

In an unprecedented example of blatant ageism huge numbers of the elderly were effectively denied medical care and a deliberate programme of genocide was introduced into care homes.

It was immediately apparent that the lockdowns – a torture technique devised by the CIA and previously used in prisons – would do no good whatsoever in preventing the spread of the infection and would, indeed, damage the immune systems of millions and slow or halt the development of immunity. It was also clear that the lockdowns would result in millions of people dying. In developed countries the lockdowns and closed medical services resulted in waiting lists for essential tests and treatment being extended so far ahead that millions were destined to die without ever being diagnosed or treated. This was officially welcomed by the medical establishment which later announced that cutting back on diagnoses and treatment would help save us all from global warming, the pseudo-scientific nonsense which had been devised as part of the plan to reduce to world’s population to 500 million and which had become something of a cult among ignorant left wingers.

In developing countries the lockdowns resulted in mass starvation which affected hundreds of millions. These disasters were completely ignored by everyone. Within days of the start of the lockdowns I predicted that the lockdowns would kill at least a hundred times as many people as covid-19.

Citizens were also told that they should ensure that they remained six feet six inches away from everyone else. There was absolutely no logical reason for this since a cough or a sneeze, the only way for the flu bug to transmit itself, can travel 24 feet. It was thought, however, that forcing people to remain 24 feet apart would, although more sensible in scientific terms, be impractical on buses and in shops.

Many myths were promoted in the mainstream media. Notable among these was the absurd idea that people without symptoms might still pass on a disease they clearly hadn’t got, and the notion that a disease transmitted by coughing and sneezing might somehow be transmitted by handling cash. This latter nonsense was part of a greater plan to get rid of cash and replace it with digital money. Sadly, millions of people didn’t understand this and thought it rather exciting and futuristic to be able to buy their morning cappuccino with sprinkles by waving a piece of plastic somewhere in the vicinity of a card reading machine.

To begin with, politicians and medical advisors insisted, quite accurately, that wearing a mask was useless, no more than virtue signalling, and would do more harm than good. It was known that masks didn’t stop viruses passing through them but did reduce oxygen levels, did increase carbon dioxide levels, did affect mental development in babies and children, did increase the risk of cancer spreading and did result in cases of bacterial pneumonia.

Suddenly, however, this sensible advice was reversed and governments and advisors insisted that mask wearing should be normal. There was never any evidence for this instruction but millions obediently wore their masks on trains and buses, in shops and offices and even in pubs and nightclubs. Many of these were so brainwashed that they became hysterical if they saw another human without a mask.

The public was encouraged to believe the drug companies (the most crooked group of companies in history) were going to save us with a series of hugely profitable experimental vaccines that weren’t vaccines, weren’t properly tested, didn’t stop people getting covid or passing it on but did kill or injure more people than any other drug in history. If a car, toaster, type of yoghurt or painkiller had killed a fraction of the number killed by this jab there would have been an outcry. The product would have been withdrawn and there would have been talk of arrests. But the drug companies were feted. The boss of Pfizer reported that when he entered a restaurant he received a standing ovation.

These dangerous products were approved – as experimental products – by agencies which often had financial links to the drug companies themselves. The approving agency in the UK was given a huge sum of money by Bill Gates, an investor in and advocate of all sorts of vaccines. Gates, who has been accused of inappropriate behaviour, also has financial links to the BBC and The Guardian, neither of which seems to mind about his past or his alleged link with Epstein which, according to the New York Times, occurred after Epstein’s conviction. Many thought that the World Health Organisation had become Gates’ private fiefdom.

As a German MEP said: ‘Pharmaceutical companies are about as interested in public health as the arms industry is in world peace’.

The big internet channels cooperated with the organisers of the coup by banning anyone daring to share the truth. I was banned by Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and YouTube and many other sites even though no one ever found an inaccuracy in any of my videos or articles. I was banned simply because the truth is considered too dangerous. At one point YouTube wrote to me to tell me that my most popular video ever on YouTube was entitled ‘Coronavirus: why did YouTube ban my video’.

Difficult though it may be for some to believe, the aim was to destroy the global economy. ‘You will own nothing and be happy,’ wasn’t an idle boast from Schwab of the Global Economic Forum.

They meant it.

And they have used every trick in the book to confuse, terrify and bewilder populations around the world.

Part Three of ‘There has been a global coup’ by Vernon Coleman appears on this website tomorrow.



One Response to “Dr.Vernon Coleman: There Has Been a Global Coup”

  1. Gordon says:

    Can’t fault what’s being said here.

    Here’s ze follow-up.

    From WEF to ROME