17 Responses to “UK COLUMN NEWS – 15TH FEBRUARY 2023”

  1. ian says:

    One of my concerns with UK Column is that to me, it seems a little naive, and perhaps is to a degree a gate keeper. Like Jacinda Arderne, Nicola Sturgeon’s leaving, will not affect anything. These people don’t make any decisions. The SNP is in my opinion being deliberately made unpopular and wiil continue on that path, as the ‘INDEPENDENCE’ thing doesn’t fit with current plans.

    • stevie k says:

      I agree Ian about the UK column i stopped watching a while back as they were just reporting stuff many of us already know and don’t seem to offer any solutions. With a following as large as they have surely they could get something organised to make a difference. On the occasions I’ve spoken to Brian & Mike they seem genuine but there is just something niggling in my mind about them. The UK as well does not represent a “country” it is a corporation.

      • Tapestry says:

        I agree. They stop short of reporting minor parties giving all the oxygen to the main parties where we are all dead. Life is on offer but you need to find it and talk about it, not continually refer to the dead end.

  2. Tapestry says:

    Scottish independence fits well with English independence which is what they don’t want. Yet we can only keep Brexit if we break away from the UK. Join the Teds.

    • stevie k says:

      The whole system of governance needs to change Tap to make it truly representative. I agree that Nationalism is the antidote to Globalism but the people need to be able to vote on what policies they want not just be able to vote some smooth talking lying bastard into ” Power” who fills his/hers pockets while they’re there and there’s no way of getting rid of them. The people should have the say on what policies they want carried out not the glove puppet who they were presented with by the party system. Then maybe we could vote to end usury and have a real financial system for the people. That would go a long way to make life fairer for everybody.
      “The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin…. Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money and with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it all back again. Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, and then this would be a better and happier world to live in… But if you want to remain slaves of the bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers continue to create money and control credit” Sir Josiah Stamp, Chairman of the Bank of England and the second richest man in Britain in the 1920’s. Get the TED’s to adopt this policy and you’ll get my vote Tap.

      • pete fairhurst says:

        Interesting quote from Sir Stamp, stevie. And very very relevant today too. He spoke the truth didn’t he

        It was a pivotal moment for me when I realised that this is still the case in the 21st century. [I was over 50 when I found this out!] Even more so when I realised that there are much, much, fairer alternatives that are NEVER mentioned by any pol EVER

        It didn’t take me long to ask myself why all the, so called, progressive, leftist, democratic, peoples politicians never mentioned this fact at all. How come they all hid this? Clearly it is because, at root, they are working for The Man. Just like all the other mainstream politicians are

      • stevie k says:

        They do reveal themselves a lot sometimes Pete, this quote is from Montagu Norman when he addressed the US Bankers Association in 1924. i think it sums up these peoples true nature very well.
        “Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through the process of law, the common people loose their homes they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known amongst our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world. By dividing the voter through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance. It is thus by discrete action we can secure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished”.
        To say I hate these bastards would be a monumental understatement….

      • pete fairhurst says:

        Thanks stevie, I’ve saved both your quotes for future use. I hate them with a passion too

      • ian says:

        You summed up our situation very well stevie. Thank you.

  3. Tapestry says:

    The manifesto is on the website, Steve. englishdemocrats.party

    • stevie k says:

      I’ll have a look Tap.

      • Tapestry says:

        From ED manifesto – Our economy and currency should be managed, as far as possible, by our own government. States may be less
        independent than they once were, we should resist those who would leave our economic well-being in the hands of
        global corporations and institutions. We should retain what independence and control we have and strive to gain

      • stevie k says:

        I’d prefer to see a commitment to only the Treasury issuing the Nations money Tap (as it should be) and not issuing interest bearing Bonds. A bit like the Bradbury Pound which the Banksters soon put a stop too. No usury and any new money has to benefit the Nation or the people, not the International Financiers. We have to cut off their funding and starve the beast.They bring sweet FA to the table but expect to gorge on everybody else’s labour

      • pete fairhurst says:

        I totally agree with you stevie. But I also recognise that any government on the globe that decides to opt out of the western central banking system usually puts themselves firmly in the cross hairs. Such governments usually fall quickly and by violent means too

        Witness Gadaffi and Libya, his plans for an African gold backed Dinar probably sealed his grisly fate. Many said it was all about oil at the time but I don’t think so. If I recall correctly the first 2 actions of the NATO “liberators” were:
        1 Sei

        So it takes a brave politician to announce this policy beforehand. The ED’s manifesto is probably the best that we can expect realistically. Even those words will probably alert the evil ones to come down like a ton of bricks if there are any signs of traction

        What a mad world we live in

      • pete fairhurst says:

        It posted automatically before I’d finished!!

        Missing 2 points:
        1 Seize the Libyan gold and ship it to US
        2 Create a western backed central bank

        Both before the invasion was even over

      • ian says:

        I agree pete. It would be a brave man who tried to opt out of their system. I think that Iran and North Korea, are the only two countries without one of their central banks in them, and boy are they popular.

      • pete fairhurst says:

        Yes Ian, Cuba too

        Cuba doesn’t really count I guess, because they are a convenient bogy for the US. They’ve probs been run by US for over a century ever since the:

        Cuban war of independence, 1895 to 1898. Combatants: Cuba and US v Spain

        Negro rebellion, 1912
        Cuba and US v Afro Cubans

        So US were “allies” per Wiki. Hard to believe Cuba was allowed any real independence isn’t it. It was too profitable for the US

        Castro was of course CIA, as Mathis showed very clearly [others too].