Tap News
Tap News Log in Register ☰

NORD STREAM UPDATE: In lengthy interview with the Berliner Zeitung, Seymour Hersh offers more intriguing details about his source’s account of the attack

 Wed 3:29 pm Europe/London, 15 Feb 2023  2
posted by danceaway

eugyppius
15 Feb 2023
Das Nord-Stream-2-Gasleck in der Nähe von Bornholm in Dänemark.

It’s been a week since Seymour Hersh released his Substack exclusive about How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline. The mainstream German press have responded with uniform scepticism. Most reports followed the example of the wire services, in leading with the blanket denials of American officials and noting that the story was well-received in Moscow. A few operations, like the state media outlet Tagesschau, attempted a more comprehensive debunking, in this case by asking experts to pick holes in the details of Hersh’s story – with less than impressive results. The other major tactic has been to attack Hersh’s credibility, along similar lines as the American press. The latest headline here is that Bob Woodward thinks Hersh’s story is bunk, and because Woodward is also a famous American journalist, that means checkmate for Hersh, or something.

eugyppius: a plague chronicle is a reader-supported publication. maybe you subscribe?

The biggest development is an interview that Hersh gave to the Berliner Zeitung. It was published yesterday and contains many new details. For example, Hersh tells his interviewer that the plan was to detonate “eight bombs … near the island of Bornholm in the Baltic sea,” of which only “six…went off.” This is the first confirmation we’ve had anywhere of an obvious point, namely that the operation wasn’t fully successful, and that this is the only reason that Pipe B of Nord Stream 2 escaped intact. He’s also more explicit on the involvement of Denmark and Sweden, saying “I was told that they did what they did [to facilitate the planting of explosives] and they knew what they were doing and they understood what was going on, but maybe nobody ever said ‘yes.’”

Hersh also provides more operational detail:

[T]there was a decompression chamber, and we used a Norwegian submarine hunter. Only two divers were used for the four pipelines. One problem was how to deal with Baltic Sea surveillance. The Baltic is monitored very thoroughly, there’s a lot of freely available data, so we took care of that, there were three or four different people for that. And what was done then is very simple. For 21 years, our Sixth Fleet … has been conducting [BALTOPS] … [F]or the first time in history, the NATO exercise in the Baltic had a new programme. It was to be a twelve-day exercise to drop and detect mines. A number of nations sent out mine teams, one group dropped a mine and another mine team went out to find it and blow it up.

So there was this period of time when things were exploding, and during that time the deep-sea divers could operate and attach the mines to the pipelines. The two pipelines run about a mile apart, they’re a little buried under the silt on the seabed, but they’re not difficult to get to, and the divers had practised it. It only took a couple of hours to place the bombs …

[T]hey did it towards the end of the exercise. But at the last minute, the White House got nervous. The president said he was afraid to go ahead. He changed his mind and gave new orders, so they had the ability to detonate the bombs remotely at any time. You do it with normal sonar, a Raytheon product by the way, you fly over the spot and drop a cylinder. It sends a low-frequency signal, you could say it sounds like a flute, you can set different frequencies.

The fear, however, was that the bombs wouldn’t work if they stayed in the water too long. This is actually what happened with two of the bombs. So there was concern within the group about finding the right way, and we actually had to turn to other intelligence agencies, which I’ve deliberately not written about.

There were still active explosives on the sea bed as the pipes were leaking their gas, which explains why partially complicit Denmark and Sweden closed the whole area and denied all access, until they themselves had removed everything.

Hersh also clarifies further the chronology of Biden’s order, and appears to suggest that at least some of those involved believed they were planting explosives only as part of a negotiating tactic, and that they’d never be used. (How this is to be harmonised with Hersh’s insistence that the sonar trigger was a last-minute plan, I can’t imagine):

Joe Biden decided not to blow them up back in June, it was five months into the war. But in September he ordered it done. The operational staff, the people who do “kinetic” things for the United States, they do what the president says, and they initially thought this was a useful weapon he could use in negotiations. But at some point, after the Russians invaded and then when the operation was completed, the whole thing became increasingly repugnant to the people who were doing it. These were people who worked in top positions in the intelligence services and were well trained. They turned against the project, they thought it was crazy.

Shortly after the attack, after they had done what they were ordered to do, there was a lot of anger about the operation and repudiation among those involved. That’s one of the reasons I learned so much. And I’ll tell you something else. The people in America and Europe who build pipelines know what happened. I’ll tell you something important. The people who own companies that build pipelines all know the story. I didn’t get the story from them, but I quickly learned that they know.

Elsewhere, Hersh says that the discontent with Biden’s attack is specifically within the CIA, where participants in the operation are “appalled that Biden decided to expose Europe to the cold in order to further a war he will not win.”


As I said before, it seems obvious that what happened to Nord Stream is an open secret in security and government circles, and that the truth simply can’t be acknowledged, because nobody in the German government wants to live with the political consequences. The only really interesting detail that all the debunkings have in common, is their refusal to address what I see as the central problem with Hersh’s story. As I said before, he says divers planted explosives at a point where the Nord Stream 1 and 2 pipelines run just one mile apart from each other. This only describes the location of the second cluster of explosions on 26 September. The first explosion hit Pipe A of Nord Stream 2 well to the south, at a point where the two pipelines are perhaps 15 km apart.

This detail appears particularly important, in light of flight data which seems to confirm Hersh’s account that a Norwegian P8 dropped a sonar buoy into the Baltic northeast of Bornholm sometime around 4am on the morning of 26 September. Crucially, this data has the P8 arriving too late to trigger the first Nord Stream 2 explosion, which happened at 2:03 am local time. It looks for all the world like somebody organised two totally separate operations, involving two separately triggered pipeline attacks, and that Hersh’s source only knows about one of them.

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/nord-stream-update-in-lengthy-interview?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Responses to “NORD STREAM UPDATE: In lengthy interview with the Berliner Zeitung, Seymour Hersh offers more intriguing details about his source’s account of the attack”

  1. 15 Feb 2023 8:35 PM
    stevie k says:

    No mention of any “British” involvement? I find that hard to believe, they’re usually up to their neck in stuff like this. Or was Liz Truss just telling Blinken his tea was done….

    • 16 Feb 2023 9:44 AM
      ian says:

      Lol stevie. Then again, possibly they could manage to make a cup of tea between them. I agree, that the “It’s done”, call, is very incriminating, and people giving interviews are perhaps being quite economical with the truth.

Back to Top

The Tap Blog

The blog that's fed by you, the readers. Please send in the news and stories that you think are of interest using the form below.

Help Support The Tap

If you enjoy the Tap Blog then please help support the hosting costs and site upgrades. Your contributions whatever the amount will help keep this valuable and much loved resource online now and into the future. Thank You!

Under New Management

Get the Full Story

Search The Tap

Tap Archives

Recent Posts

  • New Graphene Sensors Could Help Make Mind-Control Robots A Reality
  • West Surges Arms/Ammunition to Ukraine ahead of Kiev’s all-or-nothing offensive – Brian Berletic
  • Sunak, one step closer to nukes. Hungary, no to ICC, Borrell & NATO.
  • RICHIE FROM BOSTON: PROOF OF BLUETOOTH IN VACCINES!! TURNING HUMANS INTO ROBOTS!! GRAPHENE COBWEBS..
  • Alex Krainer – Why hypersonic weapons change everything
  • Who’s Bogged Down In Ukraine?
  • Ukraine – ‘a war to the last European’.

The Alternative View 12

AV12 presentation recordings are now available to watch online. www.alternativeview.co.uk

The AV13 one day live gathering conference is coming in October 2023. Speakers and ticket info coming soon.

Sharing

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Recent Comments

  • sovereigntea on Emergency Messages from Gov – Advice is, Don’t Reply
  • Gordon on Little Jonny wants some help.
  • Gordon on Emergency Messages from Gov – Advice is, Don’t Reply
  • ian on YUK makes world sick with uranium depleted weaponry
  • ian on Emergency Messages from Gov – Advice is, Don’t Reply
  • newensign on Emergency Messages from Gov – Advice is, Don’t Reply
  • Tapestry on Britain Supplying Depleted Uranium Rounds to Ukraine

SUBMIT NEWS

Please complete the required fields.
Please select your image(s) to upload.
Add another image

Reset form

Atom Feed

This site is intended as an informational guide. The remedies approaches and techniques described hearin are meant to supplement, and not be a substitute for, professional, medical care or treatments. Any information is for entertainment purposes only.

Any previous articles which prefix the 8th of February 2023 have no involvement in new upload to this site. Any Copy right infringements are not intended and any such should be made aware to the site for immediate withdraw.

Articles posted here are for your consideration at your discretion. No purported facts have been verified. Articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the poster nor the site owner.

Blog editor - tap[at]alternativeview.co.uk

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}