Dutch University of Groningen fires ‘conspiracy lecturer’Mon 2:23 pm Europe/London, 13 Feb 2023 1
Free West Media | February 12, 2023
The sub district court has ruled that the University of Groningen (RUG) may dismiss lecturer Tjeerd Andringa. An external investigation had been launched into the lecturer, alleging that he had used too many “one-sided alternative sources”.
Andringa was suspended early last year for allegedly spreading “conspiracy theories” at the university. The investigators argued that there was “an insufficient” safe learning environment in Andringa’s class.
The investigation committee “concluded that conspiracy theories played an inappropriate role in teaching”. The university subsequently decided to dismiss Andringa. He took the matter to court, but lost.
Andringa told students that “alternative media cover a lot more topics”. He also commented on their quality: “If you know how to find them, you will see that they are also of a much better quality.”
What are these so-called “conspiracy theories”? For example, he argued that intelligence agencies most likely organise sex parties with children to recruit new members for the kakistocracy, a form of government by the worst, least fit or unscrupulous citizens.
This, he said, is evidenced in part by the fact that intelligence agencies have close ties with terror groups and paedophile networks. “If you are looking for the most unscrupulous people, sex parties with children are an excellent selection mechanism.”
Attacks on their own populations
He also said he did not believe the official narrative about the September 11, 2001 attacks. “Just take Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, and yet collapsed. Twenty minutes before Building 7 collapsed, a BBC correspondent was already confirming it on TV, with the then still proudly erect building clearly visible in the background.”
He said in an interview with Novini that governments do often attack their own people in order to make their citizens fearful and docile. “What is certain is that secret organisations have carried out attacks on their own population. Operation Gladio is a clear example.”
Basing wars on lies, like the one against Iraq, he said, was typical of a kakistocracy.
Most citizens aren’t interested in such knowledge, however. “That’s because through the mainstream media they don’t come into contact with these kinds of ideas very much, if at all. People don’t want to know either. People who cannot criticise the system they are part of, cannot bear the thought of contributing to a kakistocracy.”
He states, Quote, “Most citizens aren’t interested in such knowledge, however. “That’s because through the mainstream media they don’t come into contact with these kinds of ideas very much, if at all. People don’t want to know either. People who cannot criticise the system they are part of, cannot bear the thought of contributing to a kakistocracy.”
He seems to simplify things with that statement. I, and I’m sure others amongst you, have tried to talk to people about obviously FF events and real news. You get a variety of responses. Some seem to think that, like parents, the government wouldn’t do eg 9/11. I think in some cases as he says, they’re putting their fingers in their ears and going la la la la, and don’t want to know. These people seem to find it more comfortable to be a sheep and be just part of a pre agreed set of rules, and importantly narratives. There are many though amongst the masses, that just believe the TV, and they think it wouldn’t lie to them. It’s possibly coming from different angles too. Possibly part of it is Stockholm syndrome, but there is also the fact that the whole system, ie having the right to vote, and participate in a superficial level in politics, and being deliberately led to believe that it is their country, sweeps up many main stream people into the net. It’s only when they are confronted by “their”, government, as in the vaccine roll outs in NZ and Aus, that they realise just how, “not theirs” the Country really is. I believe it is a far more complicated and deviously designed system and consequently belief system amongst the masses, than the author suggests. I do however love his teaching methods and think it is awful that he is being sacked. That in itself should make people think, but it won’t.