Wernher Von Braun Took This Secret to His Grave and Then Told the Truth

by N.Morgan

Wernher Magnus Maximilian Freiherr von Braun was a German-American aerospace engineer and space architect. He was a member of the Nazi Party and Allgemeine SS, as well as the leading figure in the development of rocket technology in Nazi Germany and later a pioneer of rocket and space technology in the United States.

Now the truth comes out! Von Braun revealed the truth on his tombstone. He knew all along.

 

A warning from Dr. Wernher Von Braun about the fake alien invasion from 1974:

Share far and wide help keep Alt Media alive!! 

https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2022/11/wernher-von-braun-took-this-secret-to-his-grave-and-then-told-the-truth-videos-3784485.html

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

20 Responses to “Wernher Von Braun Took This Secret to His Grave and Then Told the Truth”

  1. ian says:

    Psy op. Yes the moon landing were faked. We however live on a globe spinning in space. We are being attacked from all angles just now. BTW the Psalms 19:1 says The heavens are telling of the glory of God; And their expanse is declaring the work of His hands.

    Hardly saying that the earth is flat.

    • Gordon says:

      Yes, one of my favourite Psalms as is Job: 38.

      2Enoch
      From invisible and visible substances I created man.
      From both his natures come both death and life.
      And (as my) image he knows the word like (no) other creature.
      But even at his greatest he is small,
      and again at his smallest he is great.

      God’s Stars Do Witness

      The stars do come one by one
      To witness night that it’s begun
      And as sun’s light fades away
      Almighty God He stands to say

      Day must now shed not her light
      The time has come for dark of night
      And thus His finger now draws the line
      Two witnesses be His Almighty sign

      The call is given from His heavenly throne
      And stars quake now to their spiral bone
      As angels trumpet such great the order
      To herald each their Father’s most border

      For now He sits to name His hosts
      And brings them out that He may boast
      To man on Earth to realise
      That He made these He tells no lie

      That by their count He is able
      To set the glory of His starry table
      And on He this and by each fine dish
      A note by Word which reads like this

      Dearest (…………) whom you that be
      Come to table and dine with Me
      For ’tis you by His gracious call
      My Father invites to My starry ball

      No need for veil the old has dropped
      The house the walls the bloody lot
      For you alone His attention caught
      The price for you My blood has bought

      And new I’ve made just of late
      So much the better with new upgrade
      My rooms are many My parlour great
      Each now dressed and pearl for gates

      So come now please come dine with Me
      My Father’s prepared His speciality
      So come now please come dine with Me
      You’ll enjoy the fruit of Our sweet fraternity

      Eternally yours

      The Word.

      By

      Gordon

    • stevie k says:

      Just out of curiosity Ian, how much investigation have you done on the subject and what definitive proofs can you offer?

      • ian says:

        Hi Stevie, Everything fits in exactly with the planet, solar system things. The Tides work in relation to the Moon, and a lesser degree the sun. the water spins down the plughole in the southern hemisphere in the opposite direction to the north. The curvature of earth is visible, contrary to flat earth sites, especially at sea. As far back as the Rhyme of the Ancient Mariner as they headed South, ‘The ship was cheered, the harbour cleared,
        Merrily did we drop
        Below the kirk, below the hill,
        Below the lighthouse top.”.

        WW2 Spotters often picked up smokestacks on the horizon.. I had a picture taken by myself of the windfarm off the Dalbeatty coast with the blades below water level.

        Let me however make one thing clear. I am not going to expend my time as some people want with, well what about this then, or well how about this. I have several Astronomy books which can predict positions of celestial objects precisely to within seconds.
        There are sites like this where you can track satellites
        https://www.heavens-above.com/

        What proofs do you want Stevie, give me an example of what would prove it to your satisfaction.

      • ROTH says:

        My favourite proof is the sun shining on the underside of the cloud layer just after sunset, as happened yesterday while I was walking the dogs. I don’t believe the flat earth theory caters for this.

  2. ian says:

    Here’s a pic I took of the moon in 2006. looks real to me.

    • stevie k says:

      Proof of curvature Ian would be a good start… As far as I’m aware no one has ever proven it, long distance photography disproves it. Did you see the video about the team of scientists and engineers from a University in Brazil who spent nearly 2 years devising and carrying out experiments to prove curvature and found none.
      Proof of the Earth travelling through space would also help, many eminent scientist in the late 1800’s early 1900’s carried out experiments to prove the Earth was in motion and proved it wasn’t, Airey, Sagnac, Michelson/Morley could find no proof of motion. Have you seen the film “The Principle”? While not about flat earth it tells about the result of the study into the background radiation from “space” that scientists carried out some years back which showed the Earth was the centre of the “universe”, they thought they had made some error and did their calculations again, same result and the result was quietly binned.
      A good photograph of the Earth from “space” would also help, all we get are images of which most are provable fakes.
      If the Govt and “science try to push a narrative on me so hard and ridicule any attempt at a constructive debate then I tend to think they’re deceiving me. Why won’t Neil de Grass Tyson do a live debate with Eric Dubay? There are so many lies told about the “Globe” it makes me very suspicious.
      And to finish I find it very hard to believe I’m supposedly on a Spinning ball travelling through space in at least 4 different rotational directions at a speed of at least 2 1/4 millions miles an hour…. And I don’t feel a thing? Hang on to your hat Ian.

      • ian says:

        What about the flat earth theory being pushed at you Stevie? you seem ok with that. Only long distance photography on the flat earth sites proves there’s no curvature. As for movement on earth, I can’t understand why you’d expect it to be noticeable. We are within earth’s atmosphere which is travelling with earth through the vacuum of space, what do you expect, speed bumps.

        As for people not wanting to debate it, I don’t blame them, as in my experience, flat earthers won’t believe anything you say and it drags on and on.

        How about we agree to disagree Stevie.

      • ian says:

        BTW if it’s any consolation, I believe that NASA is a load of bollocks.

      • sovereigntea says:

        With the greatest respect.

        What a load of bollocks.

      • stevie k says:

        I wouldn’t touch the subject for months Ian I was so wedded to the “Globe” but then I started to investigate what proofs they had presented and found them hard to dismiss.
        You have to ask yourself why they invest so much time and money to convince us of space travel if the “globe” was real.
        It should be an easy subject to prove but seems very difficult for them.
        I don’t profess to know the truth Ian I just ask for proof and as yet I’ve seen no real proof of the globe, the real answer may be wholly different to the Globe or the Flat Earth models.

      • ian says:

        One additional thing to bear in mind Stevie is that the distance round the equator is roughly 25,000 miles. A standard football is 27″ in circumference. If you stick two markers on a football 1″ or so apart, that is 1000 miles on earth, and you can’t see a fraction of that distance but there is little if any discernible curvature.

        Another thing to consider and slightly more difficult to explain, is the rate of day length increase/decrease with the seasons, and we’re northern hemisphere here. South is the opposite way round

        Imagine a clock face with the sun in the centre, and the earth going round the numbers on the face. 12 months, and 12 numbers, so 12 is December and six is June. Fairly simple. The only factor which increases day length, is the amount of travel vertically to the June position, nor circular motion. So as the earth travels to Jan or the no 1 position, it hardly moves southwards, it’s more sideways than down. It improves slightly as it moves to two or Feb, and really shifts as it goes to three.

        These measurements exactly match the day length increases and decreases, if you check them out. This proves that the earth is travelling on a circular path around the sun.

        I hope that helped pal.

      • stevie k says:

        We could go on forever Ian… I think that would be covered with the movement of the Sun’s rotation between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn as laid out in the Flat earth model.
        As for curvature the equation is 8″ per mile squared so a body of water 10 mls across, the water in the centre should be 16 ft higher than a straight line from shore to shore, this has been tested in the past with setting up a telescope on a pier and focusing on another pier of the same height 10 mls away. A boat sailed between the two with a marker on its mast at the same height as the telescope, the marker stayed the same height while the boat sailed between the 2 points where it should have risen and fallen due to curvature. Many such experiments have been carried out, the Bedford Levels being a famous one.
        A theodolite set up on the Isle of Man showed a long stretch of the Welsh coastline, the horizontal line on the theodolite showed no curvature on the shoreline over tens of miles where there should have been a noticeable curve upward in the centre. Objects are visible from vast distances that should be hidden behind the “curve”. Boats disappearing over the horizon are brought back into view with a good pair of binoculars or telescope.
        Have a read of Eric Dubay’s book “200 Proofs the Earth is Flat” just out of interest. Look up the experiments I mentioned previously, these were carried out by some of the most eminent scientists of the day, you can’t just dismiss their findings without knowing anything about them.
        As a last note explain to me how a pressurised system like the Earths atmosphere can exist next to the “vast vacuum of space” with no physical barrier? Vacuums are incredibly strong forces, gravity is acknowledged as a weak force so the earths atmosphere should have been ripped off many years ago. Remember it’s zero gravity on the “Space Station” according to the Astronots… the “Space Station” is still in the Earths atmosphere as it’s only about 200 mls up, so what’s stopping the atmosphere from escaping into “space”? And what is this strange force called gravity? I thought it was a force of attraction between 2 objects of mass? So why doesn’t the moon collide into the Earth but just circles around it? It’s in orbit you say (or that’s what we’re told to say) 2 magnets wouldn’t dance around each other they would clamp together. Where does the energy come from to propel these massive objects in their never ending waltz around each other?
        Research the subject fully Ian, I spent 2 years reading everything I could find from old books to new ones before I made my choice of what to believe. The subject has been debated over very many years there are a great many proofs too numerous to mention here and as I mentioned earlier why won’t Neil de Grass Tyson debate Eric Dubay? It should be a walk in the park for him surely…..

      • ian says:

        This why I don’t do it Stevie. It is a load of shite, and it goes on forever. You can’t use water for the curvature. the water for tides is not made fresh every time. it comes from elsewhere leaving low areas.

        I am taking no further part in this conversation, so you can get a little nip in if you like. kindest regards pal. This will not stop me from calling out the FA as shite every time it comes up., and I already agreed that NASA is bollocks. Bye.

  3. raymond says:

    Surely most intelligent people are aware that “Flat Earth” is a CIA initiated distraction narrative ?
    For me, a far more interesting idea is that the Moon is an artificial construct “towed” into place to help set up “evolution” . The evidence to demonstrate this is appealing and far from absurd, imho .

    • ian says:

      Are you Raymond the 77 brigade Corporal?

      • raymond says:

        Ian, I would not consider being part of any military organisation with a rank lower than General.
        And if I was part of any silent operation, I would hardly openly chat about it.
        But are you Ian from Bash Street Kids ?

      • ian says:

        Well considering that it was you who talked of towing the moon Pal come on, oh hang on is that tow hitch, possibly.

    • ROTH says:

      I’ve read the same, I think it was on Jim Stone’s site, where he wrote about the native americans speaking of ‘the times before the moon’.
      Somewhere else too, that I can’t remember. That particular story was that it was towed into place to keep the axis of the earth off centre and so create the seasons, which would then favour mammals over reptiles. We must all hang around the same or similar websites.