One of our readers, Piotr Bein, has responded to an article we published on Saturday titled ‘An International Appeal to Halt Rollout of 5G’.

Bein has met the Appeal’s co-creators: Claire Edwards and Arthur Firstenberg.  Edwards later discovered the Appeal had been hijacked, she severed her ties with the Appeal and alerted fellow 5G activists:

“Arthur Firstenberg has chosen to associate the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space with a dubious self-appointed group, stop5ginternational, which was infiltrated by someone closely associated with various people at the very top of the Club of Rome/Agenda 21/2030/”sustainable development” movement.”

I probed Claire’s allegations, Bein writes, but there was insufficient evidence that would corroborate Claire’s claims. However, over time, Bein noticed that neo-Marxist “climate change” and “social and environmental justice” crept into formerly sensible anti-5G actions.  In his letter to The Exposé, Bien explains how he discovered, through his own investigation, the “dark side” of the Appeal.

To The Exposé,

Dark side of International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space

With reference to the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space here is its less glorious side. My motive is not to re-fry the story to chastise anew its actors who remain crassly offish and uppish about it. I’ve done it already, but the individuals are not ripe for a change of their mind, heart and ways. Rather, I’d like to restore balance for the public to consider the Appeal in a realistic light.

An observer of the 5G scene, by January 2019 I was familiar with the Appeal and its technical background, and have e-met some anti-5G activists, scientists and the Appeal’s co-creators, Claire Edwards and Arthur Firstenberg. I was pleased with the Appeal’s educational and campaigning potential and thought its wrinkles could be ironed out, but a year later I became a captive investigator of a predicament that was brewing and erupted upon Claire’s disclosure.

The Appeal hijacked

Claire alerted fellow activists of a hijacking of the Appeal, naming as culprits the co-editor Arthur Firstenberg and an infiltrator of a self-appointed group Stop 5G International (S5GI), who allegedly worked with the globalists worldwide:

Claire objected to the use of the Appeal and its signatories’ data in support of a group with dubious alliances, ethics and accountability:

She apologised to the signatories, sympathisers, fellow anti-5Gers worldwide and the general public for failing to prevent the hijacking. No apology nor rational explanation for ousting Claire came with the co-option, which indicates that it was not a change of hands in good faith.

Contribution robbed; signatories’ personal data violated

Claire was a co-author, co-editor, the designer of the Appeal, and the administrator of all its language versions. Disenchanted and depressed because of the appropriation of her work, Claire severed her association with the Appeal she contributed to substantially:

Despite repeated requests, Arthur also failed to remove my signature and personal data that he captured with the Appeal. More damning than ignoring requests to do that, and to clean up fake signatories on the Appeal, he refused to disclose his accounting for donations and expenses in conjunction with the Appeal.

Alleged infiltrator vindicated

I probed Claire’s allegations, unmasking a number of persons as the globalists’ useful ignorants in the best case, or, in the worst one — cone artists against Humanity. But try as I did, incl. a confidential e-talking with the accused person, there was insufficient evidence that would corroborate Claire’s claims against the alleged infiltrator. Consequently, I gave that person the benefit of my doubt. Named Nicolya, she thanked me, summing up an unfortunate state of personal relations in anti-5G grassroots (and in many other ones, in my opinion):

I couldn’t agree more with Nicolya, but I exempt from her wrap-up the deliberate plants, agents provocateurs and infiltrators in grassroots groups. Judging by their fruits, Arthur and other actors in the scandal look shady. Decrying the opponents and pontifically threatening pseudo-legalistically, they stirred up the altercations. Hard evidence is in the open against Tanja Rebel, a former Extinction Rebellion (XR) activist now associated with the Appeal, and Reza Ganjavi, a campaigner in Switzerland whom I skip here to save space. They made much noise about their uprightness, but the evidence speaks for itself.

Trojan horse

I was unable to find any proof that the old “new” Appeal became a campaigning star. Neither does the rise of signatory numbers by 100k to 300k since Claire’s alarm bear witness to it. Was the Appeal’s new management superior in effectiveness, the numbers would run in the millions.

Then what was the ruckus about? As soon as local anti-5G grassroots rushed to Facebook’s Stop5GInternational account, neo-Marxist “climate change” and “social & environmental justice” crept into formerly sensible anti-5G actions. I noticed it when our Polish group, whom I had alerted of the hijack, nevertheless endorsed S5GI’s January 25th, 2020, global protest day.

Arthur continues to benefit from the Appeal he co-opted. Tanja benefits from donations, too, as she sits with Arthur on the board of directors of the custodian of the stolen Appeal, Cellular Phone Task Force (CPTF) founded in 1996 by Arthur who presides over it to date. Who placed Tanja on the board, when and why, remains unknown.

A money maker

CPTF accepts donations by cheque and PayPal to support work around the Appeal. There’s no mention of Arthur’s particular contribution to it in his CV, while on his list of nearly 200 publications he is a co-author with Claire Edwards, Rainerg Nyberg and Lynne Wycherley of only two articles about the Appeal (2018 in English, 2019 translated into French).

Neither Nyberg nor Wycherley figure as CPTF officials so does “we” mean Arthur and neo-Marxist XR’s Tanja who never claimed credit for the contribution in question. Psychopaths, narcissists, and crooks say “we” while ignoring important someone (contributor/editor/admin Claire Edwards in this case), or when covering up their own dishonesty:

Widows are welcome to write a cheque, or donate their mite via PayPal, for the labours of “We The International Appeal.” Admin Arthur accepts bigger fish: For contributions over $5,000 or stock transfers, please contact Appeal Administrator Arthur Firstenberg, All donations by U.S. residents are tax deductible.

Who would entrust donations to CPTF that can’t cough up transparency and possibly hides under globalist wings? The Exposé would be denied PayPal service, would it not?

Tanja virtue signals who she is not

Who needs activistsespousing globalist-Judeocentric ideology in a movement against globalist, Israel- and psychopath Jew-led 5G tech? Tanja Rebel has not renounced her association with XR. She confirms in e-discussions her ideological confusion: polit-correct cultural neo-Marxism, climate change idiocy, Zionist Holocaust belying, and mindless sensing of “antisemitism.” In her discussions, also here, here and here, she signs off with litanies of who she is not:

Useful ignorants need not be consciously funded by eugenicists to serve the globalist agenda. Tanja replied “cease and desist” on such issue. By July 2, 2020, she finally excused her XR association, thereby indirectly admitting she is the globalists’ girl:

Tanja’s admission was news to me.

Scientist Arthur’s establishment bias

The Appeal reflects the mindset of its creators. Arthur denied that anthropogenic climate change is a hoax: Piotr, I am a scientist. Global climate change is no hoax. He also sided with the establishment “science” in a debate involving Nobelist Olle Johansson and Dr. Diana Wojtkowiak, a researcher of TF independent of the official “science”. The exchange concerned the health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) versus those of EMF-generated torsion fields (TF). Arthur dismissed Dr. Wojrkowiak’s research offhand:“Torsion fields” are a complete and utter hoax. I pressed; he admitted his source is Wiki.

Prof. Johansson concurred: Since I cannot find any support for the faster-than-light communication version of the term torsion field, I must lay this discussion to rest, and adhere to Arthur’s short firm summary. Dr. Wojtkowiak replied:

Johanssen insisted on providing a peer-reviewed publication on TF. Wojtkowiak obliged:


I have not heard that scientist Arthur nor Nobelist Olle, both supposed anti-system scientists, have put together Diana’s spectroscope to replicate her 10-years’ research. Olle has retired, Arthur has his Appeal and CPTF. Diana lost her university position, is moving her private lab for the second time due to increasing interference from torsion fields emitted in the vicinity.


Piotr Bein