Cancel The United Nations.

US seeks to turn UN into State Department branch, Russian lawmaker says
Nice smile Dmitry facing down wolves and sharks in combination.  Including a surprising number of total idiots.


6 Responses to “Cancel The United Nations.”

  1. pete fairhurst says:

    Yes cancel the UN

    It’s long been obvious that the UN is not representative of global sentiment in any way at all. The hegemon has manipulated it for it’s own purposes for ever

    [For an example then, see the destruction of Libya, it gave a fig leaf of cover for the usual shock and awe bombing campaign. Overt, in your face Satanism, unrestrained pure evil, thanks UN]

    Those days are rapidly ending now. So pleasing, can’t come soon enough for me

    The hegemon has lost it’s pole position now, it can’t make anything happen that it wants to any more. And the whole world can see that with clarity. All they’ve got left is PR/BS, evil, destruction and chaos, primarily in their own damn Empire too!

    If the global denazification does proceed as the rest hope then, the UN will inevitably fall at some point. Not before time either, bring it on

  2. Tapestry says:

    Yes the UNhas been misused over and over, but right now, Russia believes the UN can be adapted into a benevolent framework for nations to thrive within. Russia has proved very successful in blocking many moves by the globalists there, and continues to get broad support. It’s all we have Pete. If the globalists want it got rid of, you want it kept on, right?

    • pete fairhurst says:

      Do the globalists want rid of the UN then Tap? I’m not convinced that they do. Why do you say that?

      Whatever, at minimum it needs to be:

      relocated somewhere neutral,
      most of it’s current staff sacked,
      most of it’s subsidiaries abolished [starting with the WHO]
      it’s core principles carefully reviewed and revised
      and far far more too

      It seems beyond reform to me, it’s a behemoth, so starting again with a properly founded organisation would be far more sensible. Why not just scrap it and start over again? Perhaps with a sensible transition programme to retain the needed bits in the interim. But immediately get rid of the evil dross [how else can one describe the likes WHO, et al?]

      Tbh the fact that the Russians want to retain this moribund and wrong headed tool of the oligarchs makes me feel nervous about the Russians real intentions

      • sovereigntea says:

        Said globalists have paid an awful lot of money via an assortment of schemes to control & direct the UN mechanism to their own sinister ends. The CIA WEF is just one of them.


        The United Nations Headquarters in New York was built in between 1949 and 1950 near the East River, on 17 acres of land bought in New York to the principal builder of the time, William Zeckendorf, the purchase was ordered by Nelson Rockefeller, after the initial offer placed on the property of the Rockefeller family of Kykuit, rejected the view that it was too far from Manhattan. The eight and a half million dollars to purchase the land was financed by his father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who donated to the city. The principal architect of the complex was Wallace Harrison, the architect-consultant of the family.

    • sovereigntea says:

      There is a saying “don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater”

      The UN despite grave reservations has potential

      Just get rid of the globalists then happy days.

      Or worship the god of eternal wars

  3. sovereigntea says:

    Brotherhood of Man (Lyrics)