How UK’s Dictatorship Works, & Why Its Deep State Have Chosen Keir Starmer to Become Prime MinisterFri 3:59 pm Europe/London, 14 Oct 2022 6
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
On October 13th, Alexander Mercouris, whose predictions have (depending upon how one interprets them) been either 100% or else at least 90% accurate, in the past, predicted, in a video titled “Regime change plot in UK”, that the UK’s Deep State have decided that the UK’s current Tory Prime Minister, Liz Truss, will soon be replaced by a Tory stand-in, who will then call for a new election, which will then result in the Tony-Blairite (like U.S. Democratic Party) Labour Party’s Keir Starmer to be s’elected’ to become the next Prime Minister. So: this predictor, whose predictions in the past have been perhaps unsurpassed for accuracy, is now saying that very soon, the UK will again be led by a close friend of Tony Blair, Starmer, who has been chosen by UK’s “Deep State.” Furthermore, Mercouris says that the reason for all of this is that the UK’s “Deep State” has only one supreme requirement in a PM: to maintain the Deep State’s control over the Government — not to solve any of the nation’s many real problems, but simply to keep the Deep State in control over the country. Mercouris says that Starmer was chosen especially because unlike other possible other appointees to the PM post, Starmer would be willing to use any measures necessary in order to “clamp down” (13:17 in the video), including any measures that might be necessary, no matter how brutal, for strike-breaking by the Government. (In other words: the word “Labour” in “Labour Party” is only in order to fool its voters to think it’s not fascist, like all of the Deep State’s Parties actually are).
If I differ from Mercouris (to the extent that I might) it’s on only one thing: Whereas he never identifies whom the “Deep State” are, I do: It consists of the country’s private wealth, especially the nation’s richest 0.000003%, or billionaires, the few individuals who own a controlling interest in one or more of the nation’s international corporations. In other words: I identify a dictatorship’s aristocracy — the few individuals who employ or otherwise hire, as their agents, the individuals who determine the outcomes of ‘elections’ in the ‘democracy’ — as being the country’s billionaires. The billionaires control those agents (some of whom are the governmental office-holders, but others of whom are lobbyists, board members in those corporations, and etc.). Being in the top 0.000003% wealth-class means having lots of “carrots” to feed to, or reward, lots of agents, and therefore as having however much influence upon the government that one wants to have in order to be among the government’s actual controllers (not nominal controllers, like voters are in a ‘democracy’). However, since Mercouris doesn’t identify whom he is referring to by the phrase “Deep State,” I am not — at least not technically — disagreeing with him, about that matter.
In a previous article, “More About UK’s Dictatorship”, I described splits within the UK’s aristocracy, and how agents for the UK’s Conservative Party aristocracy had engineered the replacement of Theresa May by Boris Johnson as PM, and also how the Labour Party’s aristocracy had replaced Jeremy Corbyn by Keir Starmer
Furthermore, my latest book, America’s Empire of Evil, presents evidence that there is actually a history to the UK’s controlling ideology that now is represented virtually — if not completely — unanimously, by the billionaires of all Parties in both the UK and the U.S., and that this ideology (commonly called neoliberalism-neoconservatism) was conceived and only privately introduced in 1877, by the British aristocrat Cecil Rhodes, who expressed the necessity for the UK’s Empire ultimately to — by means of subversion — to retake control over the U.S. Government, and, then, by using that power (which he was convinced would dominate in the future) for England to extend universally the power of its and America’s aristocracy to control the entire world. So: what Mercouris is describing in the UK, is, in a sense, only the UK side of this bi-national, UK/U.S., global empire. All of it is Rhodesist.
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
Was Rhodes an aristocrat? I thought he was a vicar’s son. How off is the rest of this man’s research? Not worth reading in my estimation.
I’ve been telling folk for a while and have posted same on here that Starmer is being prepped for the next PM following an engineered snap GE.
It’s absurd that Truss is the current PM and I strongly suspect that she will be gone by this time next week. A second unelected PM would be totally unacceptable, so a General Election is almost a cast iron certainty.
Starmer has only been an MP since 2015 and has a very dubious track record in public office. He is married to a Jewess and his family are brought up in their faith.
Regarding Kwarteng, what was he doing there as Chancellor in the first place?
UK is still a 90% or thereabouts White country, so why all these ethnic minorities in such positions of high office?
Subjugation and subversion doesn’t come any more obvious.
Whilst being chaotic & self destructive to the point where one suspects the Tory party is being suicided from within to throw the next election the flailing members never fail to maintain globalist policies destructive to the UK.
A Starmer regime would seem to offer only a continuation of Communitarian woes serving & benefitting the same masters to our nation’s detrement.
Much of this poisonous ideology is enacted via the harpies of Rhodes legacy (scholars). Yet missing from class war framed picture Eric Zuesse paints is the source of transforming Communitarian ideology of self confessed Israeli terrorist Amatai Etzioni born Werner Falk 1929 Germany.
It is this Communitarian Transformation that both fake Conservative & fake Starmer Labour aspire to.
Seemingly Rhodes wasn’t an aristocrat although did go to Oxford.
His business rival / partner with whom he formed DeBeers was a rags to riches story.
Barney Barnato was born Barnett Isaacs on 21st February 1851 in a slum in Whitechapel in the East End of London and brought up in the Petticoat Lane area.
In March 1888, Rhodes bought out Barnato’s shares in the company. It is reported ‘Rhodes wrote out a cheque for £5,338,650 for the assets of Kimberley Central, which in those days was the largest sum of money ever covered in a single cheque, four million pounds of which went into the pockets of the Barnato Brothers. As part of the deal Cecil Rhodes made Barnato one of the four life-governors, arranged for him to be elected as Kimberley’s member of Parliament in the Cape Assembly and procured him membership to the exclusive Kimberly Club.’
Barney died in 1897, aged forty six. He died at sea, on route to the United Kingdom. It is suspected he committed suicide. His family reject the suicide theory, citing it as against his character. It is possible foul play was at hand in this untimely death given his vast riches.
At the time of his death, he was declared one of the richest men in the nineteenth century. His body was found and buried at Willesden United Synagogue Cemetery in the London Borough of Brent.
Barney’s sister Sarah married Abraham Rantzen. Barney Barnato is English journalist and television presenter Esther Rantzen’s five times great uncle.
Starmer’s primary task building a global authoritarian Kibbutz controlled by Etzioni’s bedfellows.
RIP Niki Raapana died unexpectedly July 2022
Niki Barbara Raapana Friedrich
August 3, 1956 – June 15, 2022
G’day sovereigntea. Never heard of her until I read your comment. A bit young at 65 but tomorrow is promised to no one. My Mum died in her 30s so 65 ain’t a bad innings in some respects. I’m getting and feeling so old nowadays that I get really hacked off at times still being around when so many young ones are checking-out and being checked-out by the satanic cabalist cult that lurks out there.
Try to live every day as if it were/was your last ’cause one day it will be as it were/was.
You can choose your friends but not your parents or relatives.
Life can be a real bitch but I’m glad that I’ve lived it. Ta Mum and Dad.
I remember a night parachute jump into the sea and once seeing what I thought were sharks fins but I think they must have been a pod of Orcas who won’t harm humans. Orcas absolutely hate sharks and will usually kill them at the drop of a hat. Gawd it was cold before being picked up.
I thought I’d never thaw out. Regards.