An alternative view of Churchill, and how official history is often fiction.

Winston Churchill – Traitor and Murderer

A Re-adjustment of History…


“World history:  There are two world histories. One is the official and full of lies, destined to be taught in schools – the other is the secret history, which harbours the true causes and occurrences.”  Honore de Balzac

Winston Churchill; the man voted in a newspaper poll as the ‘greatest ever Englishman,’ was actually an evil, self-serving, narcissistic, opportunistic, hypocritical, treacherous, traitorous, perverted paedophile and a murdering psychopath.

Preposterous you say? Read on and see if you still believe this statement to be untrue at the end of this article…

The truth about Winston Churchill is that he was a menace to liberty, and a disaster for Britain, for Europe, for the United States of America, and for Western civilisation itself.

Churchill’s original Sandhurst military file, describes him as a ‘drunken, aggressive homosexual’ and that only his mother having a ‘liaison’ with the Prince of Wales, prevented him from being prosecuted for sodomy.

The following is from the highly-acclaimed British Intelligence operative-turned whistle-blower, Anthony Thomas Trevor-Stokes, better known to truth-seekers everywhere as ‘T. Stokes’…

“Winston Churchill, who led Britain into both World Wars with his famous ‘V’ salute, is still revered by many people and was, in a recent, rigged newspaper poll voted the greatest ever Englishman.

Churchill has been exposed as a long term Zionist/Elite puppet, and served their interest before that of Britain, and whom has been shown to be from documental research and Humint, (human intelligence) to have been a Druid priest, a one-time fringe spiritualist and member of the Golden Dawn, and most damning of all, a 33rd degree mason. Masonry is universally accepted as a racist, anti-Christian and a secret elitist anti-democratic organisation.

This establishes his interest in the occult from day one, and he himself has said on record that he escaped capture in the Boer war, by his psychic ability to choose to knock on the one door that would give him shelter. His statement here is questionable from archive material research but let’s leave this for now.

His ‘V’ salute is a recognised greeting of the horned god, the symbol of the Devil worshipping Illuminati, as demonstrated by ‘Skull and Bones’ initiates.


The version of the ‘V’ salute as shown in the Star Trek TV show by Spock, is a greeting by Rabbi’s in the Hebrew tradition, the hand split down the centre represents the 2 fingers on each side of the ‘V’ in deVil, as the initials DE and IL represent the fingers. The initial ‘V’ is the 22nd letter in the alphabet, a sacred number in Hebrew numerology, and corresponds in the tarot pack to the major arcana.

Churchill changed sides in his political career four times, and his skills were on offer on several more occasions for the right price, this meant he was known in the House of Commons as ‘The Shithouse’ from his initials WC. He accepted £150,000 to bring Britain into World War II for the Rothschild bankers against Germany, and to latterly drag in the USA.

Archbishop Lang the Church of England expert on occult subjects, prior to WWII was privy to Churchill’s putting together the ‘Black Team’ those wartime astrologers, dowsers and ritual magicians, under the stewardship of Louis de Whol, Dennis Wheatley, Dion Fortune, Dr Alexander Cannon and Ian Fleming both claimed that Churchill had wartime dealings with Aleister Crowley; advertised as the world’s ‘wickedest man,’ and the famous East-End spirit medium Joe Benjamin, who was often advertised in the sixties as, Winston’s favourite medium.

Continues and source


Get the latest Tap posts emailed to you daily

7 Responses to “An alternative view of Churchill, and how official history is often fiction.”

  1. newensign says:

    A good article Ian, more people need to know the real evil character of WC. My experience is, if one mentions any of WC’s bad traits, its almost as bad as saying the “J” word! A friend of mine told me that WC after inspecting the bomb damage in the East-End and travelling down the Strand, an RAF contingent lining the road turned their backs on him! One small criticism, is that the author refers to the numerical values being Hebrew, they are not, they are Edomite Jewish, but the Bible makes one aware of the enemies secret code by which they recognise their own. Another good book is the Nameless War by Maul Ramsay, one of those MP’s arrested under 18b. See:-

  2. ian says:

    Cheers newensign, I’ll check your article out. I read David Irvings biography on him too, it’s excellent.

    • pete fairhurst says:

      Me too Ian, it was irrefutable wasn’t it, and it totally detonated the standard Winnie story. What an evil man

      Docherty and MacGregors 2014 book “Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War” also destroys Winnie utterly too. The Gallipoli story alone was a hanging offence and there is far more

      That book and it’s sequel are a must read for anyone wanting to know the real story of WW1. Same old, same old really. Unbelievable levels of evil in the Brit Establishment

      But nobody really cares do they. The standard story persists regardless. Far easier to go along to get along for most folk

  3. newensign says:

    Thanks Ian. I have a few of David Irving’s which are mine of information. I went to one of his lectures in London last May, but he is getting on a bit now.

    • pete fairhurst says:

      He was a real historian wasn’t he newensign.. Such people are virtually non existent in this era

      Unfortunately he tainted his reputation with his holocaust stuff. Which was probably on the money [I didn’t pay too much attention]

      But it brought down the wrath of the Establishment and so blackwashed his earlier work which was so revealing, and impossible to refute

      I scratch my head about that tbh. Was it a deliberate blackwash to squash the truth, or accidental? Mathis thinks deliberate and he could be correct

      • newensign says:

        Yes Pete, I used to go to some of his lectures in London, at the earlier ones one he was very cagey about the Jews and most surprising that he chose Jew lawyers to defend him and it didn’t occur to him that is why he always lost! However, the last two I went to, he was very anti-Jew. Still every one has his blind spots and weaknesses, so I don’t condemn him, after all his digging up original hand written and typed docs. was an eye opener to me!

      • pete fairhurst says:

        I don’t condemn him either newensign. He did excellent and revealing work. He found irrefutable source documents like you say

        Reminded me of Anthony Sutton too who was equally revealing about the US oligarchs funding both the Russian revolution and the German Nazis, all via source documents. His books are available free as pdf’s