Thoughts on Lizzie’s legacy. This does not necessarily reflect the views of anyone on this site, and is posted for information only.

Her Majesty’s passing has if nothing else highlighted the distinction between the cultural identification of Her British subjects and those of the New British. For instance the latter deemed the mourning crowd outside Buckingham Palace to be ‘too White’. An accusation which could draw a number of responses, one to the effect that Britain has always been a White country – at least until the traitors opened the gates in recent times. Or that if the New British claim to be British then why have they no empathy with this quintessential British institution? Or, rudely, if you don’t like British Whiteness why don’t you find yourself a nice black or brown country and escape the racism. Oh that’s right, there are no nice countries that are black or brown. And the few that are rich by way of natural resources would barely let you lot in for even a short visit.

Anyone spoy [sic] what’s odd about such a crowd, in London of all places?

Sorry, way too many white ppl in a single location”

Then over in the USA a charming ‘professor’ named Ooga Booga, sorry, make that Uju Anya (I believe her ancestors arrived in America on The Mayflower) who describes herself, inter alia, as a feminist, didn’t show much gender solidary by wishing the Queen a speedy death, adding for good measure “and may her pain be excruciating”. Charming. But I suspect she speaks (in her semi-literate way) for a high proportion of the armies of resentful and ungrateful blacks feeding on the carcass of a once-great country.

The vibrant New Britons may be in short supply among the mourners but they’re all over the corridors of power where they now hold three of the four most powerful offices in the land. And had three-passport Rishi won it would have been a full blackout. Or brownout. I’m afraid that’s Lizzie’s legacy, a Britain unrecognisable from that which she inherited where the people she supposedly represented now find themselves dispossessed and marginalised in what had been their own country.

Could she have done anything to prevent this? Well of course she could. While recognising the formal constraints applying to the role of a Constitutional Monarch had she inserted a regular reference to the “British people, our traditions and culture” in the speeches written by traitorous bureaucrats it’d would have sent a powerful message. Again, a quiet word in the ear of each new PM presenting his credentials to her would also have meant something.

As it is Britain is facing societal and economic degradation on an unprecedented scale. But if indeed she can be blamed then it can’t be said that there was any widespread public reaction against what happened during her reign. The same Uniparty has been voted in repeatedly. Even Charles Moore, the epitome of the hunting-shooting-fishing Tory of the shires had this to say about the new Cabinet: “There’s not a single white male in any of the top four posts. And that is good.” Changing the puppet makes no difference as long as the puppeteer remains the same. Traditional Britain is on its last legs and it went down without a whimper. It takes many centuries to build a civilisation, mere decades to destroy.

And those who cry ‘appease, appease’

Are hanged by those they tried to please.



11 Responses to “Thoughts on Lizzie’s legacy. This does not necessarily reflect the views of anyone on this site, and is posted for information only.”

  1. newensign says:

    While a lot could be said on the merits or otherwise of ERII reign and degree of personal influence she had on affairs of state, one has to remember, the English monarchy lost and continued to lose power since the murder of Charles II and the more so when the Monarchy itself went bankrupt during the time of Pitt and the French wars. Then in Victoria’s reign Britain went Bankrupt and the bankers took control of the country’s assets including those of the royals, from then on, all subsequent monarchs had to hand over their assets. In return for carrying their duties the House of Commons at the start of each parliament grants the royals a stipend to cover their expenses because while a monarch is on the throne, people won’t realise they are being ruled by a foreign power! However, the enemy hates monarchies. Because some monarchs are bad, but that doesn’t mean the system is bad! They rule, because the law is fixed, which they are subject to themselves, so called laws passed in Parliament are rules (Statutes) and are null and void if contrary to law. One also has to remember that the present monarchy has been heavily infiltrated by Edomites who use race mixing to defeat God’s people (Doctrine of Baalem). George the VI preferred Margret to succeed him. See

  2. danceaway says:

    Some interesting links in the comments, Ian.
    Here is one which you might find interesting; I remember if from a long way back, but have completely forgotten about it.’s%20destruction%20by%20orbital%20bombardment

    If I recollect correctly, it is an American chap who was full time carer for his disabled son, and so had time to think and research. Don’t know his circumstances now, but he seems to have acquired a partner with abilities similar to his own in decoding the occult and esoteric. Thought you might be interested in knowing about it. I shall try to keep track once again.

    Also discovered Chris Spivey’s link in the comments.

    • newensign says:

      Thanks for the link Danceaway – a lot to digest there!! However, I was unable to find Chris Spivey’s comments.

    • ian says:

      Some cracking links danceaway, Possibly too hot to handle, at least some of them. I’m slow to catch up today. Our water is off, and my Grand-daughter and her partner Archie’ are staying. My youngest son Robbie was round. When he was at school, a teacher once remarked that he was the cheekiest boy with the whitest shoes in the school. Nothing changes, and of course today he had an audience too. I had to get buckets of water from my water butt in the garden to flush the toilet, all the while being heckled. Oh the fun. I was sick as a whaup, as they say round here.

  3. Aldous says:

    “The vibrant New Britons may be in short supply among the mourners but they’re all over the corridors of power where they now hold three of the four most powerful orifices(sic) in the land.”

    Offices/Orifices is the right word(s) Ian. I’m not sure about the use of the word ‘powerful’ because these muppets don’t wield any power whatsoever and merely take their marching orders from their banker(sic) masters.
    I doubt there’s a decent orgasm amongst any of them. God can be cruel to be kind at times.

    The Mantra

    Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white..

    • pete fairhurst says:

      “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

      Yes it is Aldous. It fooled me for quite some time but eventually it became so obvious that the scales fell from my eyes

  4. Aldous says:

    If there was a free and fair UK General Election (less than two years away methinks?) the so-called Conservative(sic) outfit would be annihilated.
    Even the most die-hard, brain-dead and brainwashed serial-criminal Tory voters would probably vote tactically to unseat their cu(rre)nt Tory misfit who has likely got lots to hide in the skeletons and cupboard department.
    Don’t get me wrong because we all have things in the memory bank that we would rather forget about or wish had never happened but I don’t recall ever killing anyone who didn’t deserve dying while serving half my life in the military.
    Believe me, they were all far better off dead anyway.

    The Beginnings
    It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the English began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy-willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the English began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low,
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show,
    When the English began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd,
    It was not taught by the State.
    No man spoke it aloud,
    When the English began to hate.

    It was not suddenly bred,
    It will not swiftly abate,
    Through the chill years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the English began to hate.

  5. Belyi says:

    I have just finished re-reading ‘…And What Do You Do?’ By Norman Baker. Meticulously researched it is a damning indictment of the power and privilege of this dysfunctional family and the way it treats its ‘subjects’.

  6. Aldous says:

    “Anyone spoy [sic] what’s odd about such a crowd, in London of all places?“

    There’s no getting away from it that the walk down The Mall from Admiralty Arch to Buck House is a real tourist attraction. The red tarmac (virtual red carpet) indicates its importance.
    Queen Elizabeth’s death – probably some time ago – and the resulting media frenzy psyop is very significant.
    I’m not interested in watching State Funerals, especially fake state funerals with no one in the coffin. Was Princess Diana in that coffin 1997? I very much doubt it.
    Sandy Hook springs to mind when talking about empty coffins. The school had been closed/derelict for some time before the alleged shooting and conveniently demolished soon afterwards.

  7. Aldous says:

    That image of inept Truss and her fellow cohorts is an obscene misrepresentation of British/UK demographics where the vast majority are White. It’s anti-White racism in cultural Marxist action and not even hidden in plain sight any more.

    “…the confirmed figures from the 2001 Census showed that there were 58,789,194 people living in the UK and demographic analysis showed that of that figure, 92.1% of the population claimed to be of White British descent.”

    I think the figure has now dropped just below 90% but is still by far the vast majority.
    These Cabinet appointments are being chosen because of their color/ethnicity and certainly not because of their credentials.