Scientists from Harvard & Johns Hopkins Found Covid-19 Vaccines 98 Times Worse Than the Virus
Fri 10:03 am +01:00, 16 Sep 2022 3This pre-print won’t get any coverage in the mainstream media, so I wanted to be sure you knew about it. You might want to let your university president know about it too.
Here’s one of the articles:
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fad2b965d-b6a4-4aa4-b20a-edeecd98861c_2107x1322.png)
Here’s the paper, COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities.
It says:
Using CDC and sponsor-reported adverse event data, we find that booster mandates may cause a net expected harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented in previously uninfected young adults, we anticipate 18 to 98 serious adverse events, including 1.7 to 3.0 booster-associated myocarditis cases in males, and 1,373 to 3,234 cases of grade ≥3 reactogenicity which interferes with daily activities. Given the high prevalence of post-infection immunity, this risk-benefit profile is even less favourable.
If this doesn’t cause all universities worldwide to drop the vaccine mandates, I don’t know what will.
It should also shatter confidence in the CDC and cause investigations to take place.
I wonder what virus they are speaking of, Weaver?! Ordinary flu virus by any chance? Strange how they continue to believe in the psyop!
Absolutely possibly getting funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation which influences the making of decisions.
They’ve reached the flat-earth level of science.