Anne Frank Diary Fraud Finally Admitted
Thu 10:31 am +00:00, 25 Aug 2022 2Der Himmelstern – Jan 24, 2016
Finally, the long time fraud of Anne Frank’s diary was publicly admitted by the Anne Frank Foundation. Anne Frank’s diary was co-authored by her father and thus the credibility of the diary ultimately comes to an end.
The official admissions from the Anne Frank Foundation, and the evidence of two distinct handwritings:
The Basel, Switzerland, Anne Frank Fonds (Anne Frank Fund), which controls the copyright to the Diary of Anne Frank, has admitted that the book was in fact at least co-authored by Otto Frank, Anne’s father, after the war.
The admission proves that the book, which is still heavily promoted as a “holocaust memoir”, is in fact largely a postwar fabrication which contained parts of the young Anne’s diary with extensive additions added by her father. This is obvious from even a cursory look at the actual diary. See, for example, the image below of two pages from the diary, which shows both Anne’s real youthful handwriting and her father’s obviously adult handwriting, although he signs his entries as “Anne Frank.”
Normal copyright on books extends only 70 years after the author’s death. As Anne Frank died of typhus in Bergen Belsen in February 1945, the book theoretically entered the public domain in February 2015. But, as the New York Times went on to say, the Anne Frank Fonds has now decided to try to extend copyright on the book past the 70 year cut-off period by admitting that Otto Frank, who died in 1980, was indeed a “co-author” after all.
Foundation officials “should think very carefully about the consequences“, said Agnès Tricoire, a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics have been the most vociferous and are organizing a challenge. “If you follow their arguments, it means that they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank.“
The BIC ballpoint pen impossibility:
People already knew that the dairy was written with a BIC ballpoint pen, which was only a prototype at that time and was in no way industrialized, let alone sold on the market. They were commercialized in 1951. This already permitted many people to determine the book to be a fraud as it was physically impossible for Anne Frank to write the diary with a BIC ballpoint pen, unless she was capable of traveling through time, to the future and then return with such a writing medium…
Simon G. Sheppard, author of Anne Frank’s Novel: The Diary is a Fraud, even goes a step further claiming; “Annelies Marie Frank never kept a diary. What she called her ‘diary’ was a collection of sketches, fictional stories and fantasy letters to the eight members of her imaginary “club.” In 1944 she rewrote the lot, calling it a novel (“een roman”), but this was translated in the Diary to “a romance.” Otto Frank lied when he insisted he had not intended to publish it. First published in 1998, this is the most rigorous debunking of the Anne Frank Diary ever published, and revised in 2001 to include some recent developments in this ongoing saga.”
Conclusion:
Otto Frank, the father of Anne Frank made millions out of the death of her daughter. This is a disgusting display of macabre money making, thus by doing so he shows no respect for her daughter or her memory, while non-Jews are supposed to cry out for the faked, fantasized stories this man made up. I truly hope this new victory of truth will open the eyes of many about the genuine nature of holocaust propaganda, and how morally bankrupt this myth is.
Well be to you all,
Hail Victory,
Der Himmelstern
Sources:
solargeneral.org/anne-frank-di…
www.nytimes.com/2015/11/14/boo…
northerntruthseeker.blogspot.b…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bic_Cris…
archive.org/details/DiaryOfAnn…
www.amazon.co.uk/Anne-Franks-N…
www.darkmoon.me/2017/jews-thro…
Not without years of lying and foot dragging and putting people in court.
https://www.hdot.org/debunking-denial/af2-diary-authentic/
absolutely, Ian.
Important link you show there. Thank you.