13 Responses to “9/11 TWIN TOWERS VIDEO GOES MEGA VIRAL ON TWITTER”

  1. ian says:

    His comments on shadow banning were quite interesting. The Towers were taken down by explosives likely being detonated by timed detonators like this video @ 1:17 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PM82Rlz5lww&t=77s

  2. NPP says:

    A plane hit the Pentagon.
    It was an inside job.
    Ryan Dawson on Joe Rogan would blow open truths about 9/11:
    https://www.nedpamphilon.uk/21-on-9-11-ryan-is-the-man/

    I recommend his NUMEC film:
    https://rumble.com/v1a6xdr-numec-how-israel-stole-the-atomic-bomb.html

  3. Occams says:

    yea, yea, yea. 21 years later and MOST still think it was ‘terrorists’?

    Even my ‘lead engineer’ brother in law thinks the government story is what actually happened.

    Yea. And he;s in charge, supervising major engineering projects.

    My Litmus Test for Maskerz still wearing masks?

    “Who did 911?”

    “Oh, everyone now knows it was the Saudis” is what I hear most.

    Like covid; If you haven’t figured it out by now, well then……all us conspiracy theorists can do is hope you’re well-vaxxed, and Do Your Part To 6uild 6ack 6etter & 6righter.

  4. Tapestry says:

    Dr Judy Wood please. All other theories are weak compared to her well-researched work – Where Did The Towers Go?

    • ian says:

      I disagree Tap. I don’t think there is, or was evidence of directed energy weapons ever being used. Nano Thermite and controlled explosions explain everything that happened. I think that Judy Woods is a government psyop, Her speculation and the backing she receives, exposes to me many who are not what they claim. Why do you support her Tap? Why do you think she holds the answers?

      • ROTH says:

        It’s Occam’s Razor innit. Watching this footage shows very clearly that it was wired for explosives. Whether there were other factors at play is another matter – I think there’s merit in Dimitry Khalezov’s work – but it stands to reason that there’d be some dis-informative stories put out there by TPTB to keep us arguing among ourselves.
        When you boil it down, does it really matter which method was used to bring it down, when as Occams says above most people still believe the official story?

        Personally, this is what woke me up to the real world, a chance watching of Loose Change has changed my life massively. I now tell people to find out about Building 7 and how that fell if I happen to get into conversation about it.

    • stevie k says:

      Read her book years ago Tap and to me it’s the only work that covers all the facts and explains them. I’m certain DEW’s are real and have been used many times as in the “forest fires” where the houses were all burnt to ashes but the trees miraculously were hardly touched.

    • NPP says:

      I spent £50 on Judy Wood’s book.
      It’s bollox.
      I keep it for posterity.
      Ryan Dawson is the man on this issue.

      • stevie k says:

        And how exactly does Ryan Dawson explain the melting of cars a good distance from the Towers as also witnessed in the California fires where car engines melted but trees and other more combustible materials weren’t really affected?

  5. Occams says:

    As I have often stated regarding articles and vids such as this, I ‘believe’ 911 may have employed MANY weapons, as ‘everyone’ wanted in to test their toys Real World. An ‘opportunity of a lifetime’.

    We can argue the ‘how’ till the cows come home, but WHO should remain the topic and focus…..

    Which is WHY ‘Cui Bono’ was NEVER asked. It would have become too evident to too many.

    The ‘how’?

    Waterboard Cheney or Netanyahu, because THAT is the only way you’ll ever know how it was all set up and pulled off, 100%

  6. ian says:

    I get very heated over this subject, and all the alternative theories are needless. Yes I agree that directed energy weapons exist as demonstrated in California. The airplanes I don’t know how, but they were only decoys for the official story anyway. The buildings were brought down by explosives set by the Israeli “art students”, and thermite was used to cut sections to initiate the top down collapse. There were 4 underground layers which absorbed most of the wreckage, where did the towers go, well there Judy. As for dustification, well, normally a controlled demolition weakens and removes supports inside the buildings. It drops the centre causing the classic crimp, then removes support to the outside sections causing the collapse.

    The twin towers were totally different. They were demolished top down floor by floor to hide much of the blast work in the collapse cloud. It was blown to smithereens, hence the dustification. I read her book, where did the towers go, and watched her videos and argued with people on other sites too. Another thing to remember is that jet aircraft use kerosene as fuel, basically paraffin, which has a low temperature burn.

    Anyway enough. As Occams says, we can argue till the cows come home, and I will if you want. Israel did it, with US alphabet agencies assistance. Given the Covid fiasco, the compliance of other countries should come as no surprise.

  7. David 2 says:

    The first thing to question is WHO BENEFITS. If the facts before, during and after confirm your suspicions then you are most likely 100% correct.

    It does not really matter how they did it, the fact is the world changed that day and it has progressed downhill ever since.

    Covid is just the new World Trade Towers designed to change the world.

  8. Ander1991 says:

    Yes, sadly a lot of the discussion on 911 “how” has supplanted that on “who” and “why”.

    Whether it’s 911, pseudo-vaxx, JFK, or countless others, maybe the “mass mind” (hysteria) and its division of society can explain why there are True Believers and those who oppose them

    Ivor Cummins / Fat Emperor with Mattias Desmet on the mass mind

    https://anchor.fm/ivor-cummins/episodes/Ep150-Stunning-My-Most-Important-Interview-Yet—HOW-Covid-Happened-e1kugkd

    https://d3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net/staging/2022-6-7/2718346b-f646-4d96-82dc-5444f8ceca81.m4a

    – a bit more articulated than some of Desmet’s earlier offerings.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.