More good news for the unjabbed! 300 000 strong control group’s shock findings
Tue 3:05 pm +01:00, 14 Jun 2022 8AVOIDING THE BOOBY-TRAPPED PSEUDO-VACCINES SHOWN TO BE THE HEALTHY OPTION DESPITE GOVERNMENT’S DECEIT AND SPIN
Intro by Steve Cook
Those who signed up for the Vaccine Control Group (along with 300,oo other people) as I and my family did (see my membership card opposite) can take heart that our efforts are helping the allied causes of science, truth and liberty.
Membership of the control group involves monthly updates on one’s health so that how the unvaccinated are faring can be monitored.
As you know, the existence of a control group is vital so that the effects of a medicine or vaccine upon the user can be compared in the short and long term with the health of those who have not had it.
That way scientists can assess whether the treatment was overall worth having or did more harm than good.
Here at UK Reloaded we have long maintained that the government’s evident desperation to get everybody vaccinated even though only a small minority of people were in real danger from Covid19 was an effort to ensure there would be no control group. This was borne of a fear that comparisons would show the pseudo-vaccines up as harmful failures.
As it turned out, the effort to get everybody vaccinated floundered haplessly on the shoals of public opinion and I’m pleased to report that the prestigious Children’s Health Defense (CHD) in the USA has been able to use the Vaccine Control Group’s painstakingly collected data.
Please see the following featured CHD article for some excellent news for the un-vaccinated.
I should add that the findings therein described are very bad news for the criminal elements who pushed the booby-trapped pseudo-vaccines, another nail in their grubby coffin.
As the seriously detrimental effects upon health of their injected biochemicals become ominously clearer by the day, the credibility of the pharmaceutical-industrial crime syndicate and its front men in politics and the corporate media declines further.
Severe COVID ‘Rare’ in People Who Didn’t Get Vaccine, Survey Reveals
SOURCE: The Defender (Children’s Health Defense News and Views}
A survey of 300,000 people who didn’t get the COVID-19 vaccine revealed the unvaccinated didn’t place a disproportionate burden on health systems — in fact, they experienced very low rates of hospitalization and severe COVID-19.
The few that have been done often mix vaccinated with unvaccinated, as shown in the case of U.K. data by professor Norman Fenton and his group at Queen Mary, University of London.
That changes with the first release of the analysis of survey data from the international Control Group project — also known as the Vax Control Group.
The citizen-led project was initiated by an Eastbourne (U.K.) cooperative, the Control Group Cooperative — and it’s had more than 300,000 subscribers.
Rob Verkerk Ph.D. of Alliance for Natural Health has led a team, including Dr. Naseeba Kathrada (general practitioner, South Africa, Caring Healthcare Workers Coalition), Christof Plothe D.O. (integrative and osteopathic practitioner, Germany) and Dr. Kat Lindley (family physician, USA), that has collated, analyzed and interpreted the first five months of survey data from “control group” participants.
The survey data offer important revelations, including:
- The unvaccinated “control group” participants don’t place a disproportionate burden on health systems — in fact, quite the opposite, they have experienced very low hospitalization rates and severe COVID-19 disease is rare.
- They are more likely to self-care, using natural products like vitamin D, vitamin C, zinc and quercetin.
- Many have used ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
- Women have suffered menstrual and bleeding abnormalities despite being unvaccinated, possibly owing to spike protein exposure and shedding.
- Their mental health burden has been considerable, possibly aggravated by their stigmatization by the mainstream, “vaccinated” society.
- They have been heavily discriminated against because of their decision to exercise their right to informed consent and refuse the administration of “genetic vaccines.”
Read the press release:
No jab, lower hospitalizations — finds international survey
An international survey of a health-aware, “Control Group” that includes over 300,000 people who have chosen to avoid COVID-19 vaccination, shows participants place minimal burden on health systems through their strong reliance on natural immunity, self-care and the use of natural health supplements to help prevent or even treat COVID-19.
Yet this group faces unfounded discrimination, job losses and mental health issues intensified by its marginalization by mainstream society.
The survey of participants in the “Control Group” includes a sub-group from the over 305,000 participants from more than 175 countries who have joined the citizen-led project and opted to not receive COVID-19 vaccines.
The findings just uploaded to the preprint server ResearchGate, show that during the 5-month survey period (Sept. 2021 through to Feb. 2022 inclusive), participants suffered low rates of severe COVID-19 disease, were infrequently hospitalized, and used natural health products extensively both for prevention and for treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19.
Data from these first five months of the Control Group survey were analyzed and interpreted by an independent, international team led by Robert Verkerk Ph.D., a multi-disciplinary scientist and the founder, executive and scientific director of the non-profit Alliance for Natural Health International.
Co-authors included three practicing clinicians, Dr. Naseeba Kathrada from South Africa, Christof Plothe D.O. from Germany and Dr. Katarina Lindley from the USA.
The authors came together to assess the survey data through their collaboration in recent months with the World Council for Health, a non-profit, global coalition of health-focused organizations and civil society groups.
The survey findings were based on a sub-cohort of approximately 18,500 Control Group participants who had completed questionnaires on a monthly basis over the first five months of the survey.
Among the wide-ranging data collected, the survey captured reasons why participants avoided vaccines, with distrust of governments and pharmaceutical companies as well as concerns over adverse reactions from insufficiently tested vaccines being high on the list.
Participants reported extensive mental health problems that may have been compounded by the stigmatization and discrimination facing those who shunned COVID-19 vaccines.
It also found that women, despite being unvaccinated for COVID-19, suffered menstrual and bleeding abnormalities that may have been associated with viral exposure, shedding, spike protein exposure or pandemic-related behavioral changes. Those who never wore masks reported the lowest levels of COVID-19 disease.
Given the participants are self-selected and have self-reported, the survey findings need to be interpreted with care when comparing them with national statistics or studies based on randomly selected populations.
The U.K.-based Control Group project was established in mid-2021 as a citizen-led cooperative that aims to evaluate long-term health outcomes among the COVID-19 vaccine-free as well as linking its members to country support networks and online community groups.
Originally published by Alliance for Natural Health International.
FIND THE ABOVE VIDEO ON OYSSEE
USE THE VIDEO UMBED CODE
<iframe id=”odysee-iframe” width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://odysee.com/$/embed/ControlGroupSurveyFindings/4d1e24b3f29d4d88ed17201b7d359f0fb0a768f2?r=8qrg6tDaM21V3zs6LfyYEvjH8drRFavF” allowfullscreen></iframe>
Visit People’s Media at Liberty Rising
This article is from UK Reloaded
More good news for the unjabbed! 300 000 strong control group’s shock findings
This “study” has puzzled me from the get-go.
If one knows the agenda, why would one hand over one’s details to the executioner, as it were?
And to whom is it a “shock” that being unvaccinated is a healthier state of affairs than being vaccinated? Most of the unvaccinated learned this a while ago. not just in 2020.
Is this “study” exploiting the naive who believe the “government” really, actually does “care”? Which is why they are also destroying what was left of the NHS, as detailed by Dr Vernon Coleman? Because we “care”.
Keep reminding ourselves that there is a very sophisticated controlled opposition coming after the 30% resistants as Hugo Talks pointed out in his video discussing this topic. He suggests that many of the doctors whom we have listened to seem to have been drawn into a very Luciferian agenda, perhaps even without their realising it. But some knowing exactly what is going on. His research/analysis is interesting and thought provoking to say the least.
This is interesting, danceaway. I initially completed the form but didn’t join as a paying member. I printed out the card and laminated it so that it is exactly like the one above.
I planned to give the group updates but when I logged in the first time I found that it covered all sorts of questions that I wasn’t prepared to answer either on the web or to an anonymous group. So I found your comment extremely thought-provoking.
Your experience is quite revealing, Belyi. We are so trusting; doubtless most of the 300,000 answered those questions and now someone has that information. Who?
I gave a local lady, known locally as smiler, because she’s a miserable soul, a lift up the road before. She was walking up from a bus stop a mile away. She said she had finished until Friday as she had her sister in law’s funeral in Glasgow to attend. She was 67 and died of a blood clot she said. It’ll be them bloody vaccines she said, a lot of folk claim they give you blood clots. I agreed and suggested this site for a look. News must be starting to spread.
The conversation you relate is interesting on three counts:
I. When people have personal experiences they see they begin to see things differently.
2.Talking with others is important; hence the lockdowns and preventing conversation and discussion.
3. Could it be that when people figure things out for themselves, as this lady is doing, that it has more impact than if someone tells them? Do we, as humans, shy away from being told by others, or have a natural resistance of some sort? But if we figure it out ourselves, then we don’t need convincing or agreeing with another; it is our own thought and conclusion?
Maybe this is why we make little progress in trying to educate others? All three components are necessary in many cases?
Hi danceaway, re’ “Do we, as humans, shy away from being told by others,” Yes we do, depending on who it is. I read much about psychology in the past as I had/have issues myself. One very interesting experiment was carried out on chimps, which are more representative of human behaviour than you might think. The chimps were kept in a large outdoor enclosure and were nearly wild. A small railway line ran through a an area of the enclosure amongst bushes and undergrowth. A stuffed leopard was pulled along the rails so that ordinary troop members could see it, and they instantly shrieked alarm calls, at which point, the dominant chimps who couldn’t see the leopard ignored them as did the rest of the troop. When on the other hand the dominant chimps could see the leopard and they alarm called all hell was let loose as the whole troop scattered up trees.
For ordinary chimps think us, and for dominant chimps think government and MSM.
I also remember talking to an old guy who still lives down the road. He’s a nice guy 91 years old and still alert and only lately getting a little slower on his feet. We talked about a lot of things, and he seemed interested in our conversations about so called terrorist attacks, so I told him one or two facts about the London bombing being a FF and Ariana Grandee, and I said to him, ” If you were going to attack Britain because you hated what it’s government is doing, and you could get your hands on explosives, would you drop a couple of motorway bridges which are unguarded, into the river, or kill some 13 year old girls who were dancing.
He sat quiet for a while, then said, “You don’t half read some shite”.
So does it appear we are wired to reject information from our peers but accept it from “authority”? Only the strong of mind are able to think independently? Which is where brainwashing comes in?
Also controlled opposition; present us with those who appear to be in our side but at the same time represent “authority” due to their role as “doctors.”
Saw an interesting comment recently: why do “doctors” wear a white coat like butchers? Symbolism all around us.