4 Responses to “Henry 8th a gay and Elizabeth 1 a man? Never….”

  1. 5 Jun 2022 7:48 AM
    ian says:

    I like to read Miles Mathis, but don’t always agree with his theories, however on this occasion I have to admit that he makes a lot of excellent points and it seems very likely that his claims are true. It makes perfect sense regarding both Henry and Elizabeth

    • 5 Jun 2022 11:41 AM
      pete fairhurst says:

      Yes I completely agree Ian. Maybe this is the origin of the once widely used name for homosexuals, “queen”?

      The whole era is still promoted relentlessly in films and media isn’t it. Which makes you think that the official story MUST be false. Certainly the theft of the Church’s wealth at that time was pivotal in opening up the way for Cromwell and the Glorious Revolution in the following century. Which in itself led to the current satanic financialization of everything

      So maybe Mathis is on to something here, what he says rings true. Henry VIII only had 2 mistresses in the official story? And all his “wives” were past in contemporary terms?

      What? Do me a favour he was the damned King in the 16th century, he could have had any woman he wanted, just had to send out the word. So he only had old ladies for wives, and only 2 mistresses? What? Obviously he was not as “red blooded” as they say then. Which possibly makes him a “queen”

      It’s a common misdirection too. Mathis has previously shown that JFK and Bill Clinton were probably gay as well. Those papers on his site are easily found using “Control F” on a pc keyboard, or a menu on a Mac

    • 5 Jun 2022 11:43 AM
      pete fairhurst says:

      This just went to moderation, hence the duplicate

      Yes I completely agree Ian. Maybe this is the origin of the once widely used name for homosexuals, “queen”?

      The whole era is still promoted relentlessly in films and media isn’t it. Which makes you think that the official story MUST be false. Certainly the theft of the Church’s wealth at that time was pivotal in opening up the way for Cromwell and the Glorious Revolution in the following century. Which in itself led to the current satanic financialization of everything

      So maybe Mathis is on to something here, what he says rings true. Henry VIII only had 2 mistresses in the official story? And all his “wives” were past in contemporary terms?

      What? Do me a favour he was the damned King in the 16th century, he could have had any woman he wanted, just had to send out the word. So he only had old ladies for wives, and only 2 mistresses? What? Obviously he was not as “red blooded” as they say then. Which possibly makes him a “queen”

      It’s a common misdirection too. Mathis has previously shown that JFK and Bill Clinton were probably gay as well. Those papers on his site are easily found using “Control F” on a pc keyboard, or a menu on a Mac

  2. 5 Jun 2022 3:21 PM
    newensign says:

    I agree Pete, if one reads Comyns Beaumont’s book on Queen Elizabeth I she did in fact have children secretly, Francis Bacon was one. In my opinion Mathis does not understand who the Jews are, this word was never in the Scriptures and are mostly the Khazarian Mafia. Most people are unaware that there have been 2 Elizabeth IIs – twins Elizabeth and Lilibet, one died I believe in the 1980’s!