UK Government report states all UK Airports must close within the next 10 years, beef and lamb is to be banned, and construction of new buildings must cease in the name of Climate Change
Sun 1:08 pm +00:00, 15 May 2022 12
UK Government report states all UK Airports must close within the next 10 years, beef and lamb is to be banned, and construction of new buildings must cease in the name of Climate Change
A report produced by Oxford University and Imperial College London for the UK Government reveals that all airports will be ordered to close, eating beef and lamb will be made illegal, and construction of new buildings will not be permitted in order to meet the legal commitment of zero emissions by 2050. The report states that all airports must close between 2020 and 2029 excluding Heathrow, Glasgow and Belfast airports, which can only stay open on the condition that transfers to and from the airport are done via rail.
All remaining airports must then close between 2030 and 2049 as to meet the legal commitment of zero emissions by 2050 every citizen of the United Kingdom must “stop using aeroplanes” for a significant period of time.
In addition, the report states that to obey the law of the Climate Change Act the public will be required to stop doing anything that causes emissions regardless of its energy source. According to the report this will require the public to never eat beef or lamb ever again. To do this national consumption of beef and lamb will drop by 50% between 2020 and 2029. Then between 2030 and 2049 beef and lamb will be “phased out”.
The report also confirms that construction of new building must cease by 2050 – The underlying point is that any asset which uses carbon will have essentially zero value in 2050. This in turn may encourage greater use in the run up to 2050 – for example, putting up new buildings at a much faster rate for the next 30 years, knowing that construction must then halt.
The report was released in November 2019 and was authored by ‘UK Fires’, a collaboration between the Universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Nottingham, Bath and Imperial College London – the home of Professor Neil Ferguson.
Entitled ‘Absolute Zero’, the report is a research collaboration in which the authors reveal what the UK must do to meet it’s legal requirement to reach net zero emissions by 2050, and it makes for harrowing reading.
However, the timeline of events may speed up significantly because the Government enshrined a new target in law in April 2021 to slash emissions by 78% by the year 2035.
The authors of the report state the key messages are as follows – In addition to reducing our energy demand, delivering zero emissions with today’s technologies requires the phasing out of flying, shipping, lamb and beef, blast-furnace steel and cement.
They also state this on jobs and location –
There are two key implications for how we live our lives: first, buildings will become much more expensive because the restrictions on building which generate substantial scarcities; second, transport will become much more expensive because the limits on air travel will generate excess demand for other forms of transport.
Those who are starting secondary school now, in 2019, will be 43 in 2050. Thinking about what education is appropriate for a very different set of industries is a key question. Should we still be training airplane pilots? Or aeronautical engineers?
And they state this on implementation of the requirements –
The changes in behaviour to achieve Absolute Zero are clearly substantial. In principle, these changes could be induced through changing prices and thus providing clear incentives for behaviour to change. The alternative is that the government prohibits certain types of behaviour and regulates on production processes.
You may be wondering how on earth they are going to get the support of the public in shutting the airports and stopping the consumption of beef and lamb?
Well, we could argue they are already well on their way to ensuring the closure of many airports thanks to the draconian laws that the British people have been living under since March 2020 in the name of protecting the NHS and saving lives.
Is it just a coincidence that four months after the release of the report, the UK Government brought in the coronavirus act and implemented a national lockdown which has decimated the travel industry? A quick read through the report certainly suggests the real reason for lockdown may have been so that the Government can meet its legal commitment to reduce emissions.
They will get the support just as they got the support for implementing ridiculous, draconian laws under the guise of stopping the spread of Covid-19. Laws which have decimated small business, taken away our freedoms, and created what will be the greatest health crisis to have ever been due to turning the NHS into the National Covid Service and then the National Vaccination Service.
They managed all the above through psychological manipulation and coercion. That is not an opinion, it is fact, and it is all documented in official UK Government documents which you can read here, and here.
And they are going to use the exact same tactics to ensure you allow all airports to close and never eat beef or lamb again, this is what the ‘Absolute Zero’ report recommends the UK Government implements to achieve their legally required targets –
Social norms and individual behaviours
There is a misalignment between the scale of actions recommended by government (e.g. energy conservation) and those most commonly performed by individuals (e.g. recycling). Actions which can have a big effect, such as better insulation in houses and not flying, are being ignored in favour of small, high profile actions, such as not using plastic straws. This is enabling individuals to feel satisfied that they are ‘doing their bit’ without actually making the lifestyle changes required to meet the zero emissions target. If large scale social change is to be successful a new approach is needed.
Whilst the thought of society taking radical, meaningful steps to meet zero emission targets could be criticised for being idealistic, we can learn from historical cultural changes. Not long ago, smoking cigarettes was encouraged and considered to be acceptable in public spaces that children frequented, drink-driving was practiced with such regularity that it killed 1000 people per year in the UK, and discrimination based on sexual orientation was written into law. These behaviours now seem reprehensible, showing society is capable acknowledging the negative consequences of certain behaviours and socially outlawing their practice. Focus should therefore be centred on expediting the evolution of new social norms with confidence that change can happen.
Evidence from behavioural science, and the long experience in public health of changing behaviours around smoking and alcohol, shows that information alone is not enough to change behaviour. To make the types of changes described in this report, we will have to think more broadly on the economic and physical contexts in which designers, engineers and members of the public make decisions that determine carbon emissions.
At the same time, clear, accurate and transparent information on problems and the efficacy of proposed solutions is essential for maintaining public support for policy interventions. The phrasing of communication is also important. Messages framed about fear and climate crisis have been found to be ineffective at motivating change.
The longevity of the challenge of reducing emissions, and the lack of immediate or even apparent consequences of small individual actions mean it is challenging to link to them to the large-scale climate crisis. This allows individuals to make decisions which contrast with their desire to reduce emissions.
Scientific description is not always the most effective means of communication, and language used to promote zero emissions should no longer focus on an ‘ecofriendly’ and ‘green’ lexicon, but rather candid descriptions of actions that appeal to human fulfilment. Evidence from time-use studies shows that human fulfilment does not strictly depend on using energy – the activities we enjoy the most are the ones with the lowest energy requirements.
Consumers can be satisfied in a zero emissions landscape.
But they will also get the support they need by conditioning and indoctrinating your children in schools –
‘Starting with the difficult decisions, an educational setting should provide a timeline for actions to be taken by humanity in order to ensure that we hit our carbon reduction targets by 2050. By working backwards from 2050, and sequentially working out the order and timing in which key mitigation actions need to be taken, a roadmap for the necessary restraint can be established.
Across the secondary school system, this roadmap is essential in eliciting the questions which will inevitably come from the school children. This will enable an exploration of real change in the mind sets of those who will need to embrace change more than ever before later in their lives.
Huge questions will emerge, such as: will internal-combustion engines disappear, will aeroplanes disappear, will meat and-dairy agriculture disappear, and will we need to stop building things?By empowering school children to realise that asking the huge questions is appropriate, we will enable change to be embraced through education.
All of this will be done to allegedly reduce carbon emissions due to the alleged danger of global warming.
The average carbon footprint per person in the UK, per year, is 12.7 tonnes CO2e.
- Your heating would need to be going full blast for 80 days straight to to produce 12.7 tonne CO2e.
- You would need to drive 23,000 miles in the average car to emit 12.7 tonnes of CO2e (that’s once around the world).
- You’d have to eat over 1,000 beef steaks to produce 12.7 tonnes CO2e.
In terms of global annual carbon emissions of ca. 38,000 megatonnes CO2e, 12.7 tonnes doesn’t sound like much. But when you consider a population of 68 million people in the UK alone, nearing 8 billion worldwide, all of a sudden it sounds like in order to meet a target which is enshrined in UK law and must be legally met, it may just be easier to reduce the population of the United Kingdom?
The past sixteen months have seen –
- Lockdown after lockdown which has destroyed small business and the aviation industry.
- Evidence emerge which suggests the elderly and vulnerable were euthanised in care homes and you were then told they had died of Covid-19.
- Statistics which show disabled people account for 3 in every 5 alleged Covid-19 deaths.
- And an experimental vaccination programme which doesn’t stop you catching or spreading the alleged Covid-19 virus. However, authorities are extremely eager to vaccinate every man, woman and child. This is despite the fact over 1 million adverse reactions have been reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme and over 1400 deaths. A scheme which the MHRA state only 1% – 10% of adverse reactions are even reported.
You must read the ‘Absolute Zero’ report, authored by Oxford University and Imperial College London, the former having invented the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine, and the latter being instrumental in providing flawed models that were used to justify draconian lockdowns in both the UK and USA.
Because once you do, you will realise that the past sixteen months have been part of a much more sinister agenda that has only just begun.
Surely they are reckoning on there being a very small, impoverished population by then? A totally collapsed civilization and infrastructure?
‘reckoning’ ? More like reckoned on happening in my view.
Covid 19 was a big flop, a failed plan. Cast your mind back to closed borders, almost closed hospitals except for the dying, Nightingale hospitals to cope with the overflow of dying (unused beds), killing the useless elderly in care homes and nursing homes that would clog up the needed beds for the younger sick and dying. Schools closed, business’s closed, the airline industry almost brought to collapse. The countries economy being brought to its knees etc. etc All the stupid idiots/ sheeple happily wearing a mask and continuing to eat sh*t! and complying. I tried my best to catch covid but couldn’t.
‘A totally collapsed civilization and infrastructure?’ – That’s what was intended but didn’t happen. It flopped.
A very wise man once said to me ‘you cannot build solid foundations on lies and deceit, they will crumble’
The New World Order plan is failing, covid mass deaths failed, countries and their economies almost brought to collapse. We all have mothers, fathers, sisters and brothers, aunties and uncles, nephews and niece’s, children and friends that have been affected by the release of covid 19 virus.
Would you prod the big Russian bear and allies after you pretended to be friends then back a corrupted Ukrainian Gov with Neo-Nazi’s in the army? to fight against Russia and Russia’s allies?
Not all UK MP’s are corrupt btw there are still some very good and honest MP’s in the Gov in my observations of all the above..
Are airliners being sabotaged (like we see is happening to military planes) to scare people away from airtravel? Flight BY2772 (an Airbus A320) from Manchester seems to have been on a terrifying roller coaster of a half hour flight.
https://i.ibb.co/t3TnGqz/flight.gif
https://fr24.com/data/flights/by2772#2bdd0676
Did the flight squawk 7700, Ash?
Yes, that’s how I became aware of it. I have the app set to notify me each time there’s a 7700 squawk.
Oh my goodness! What excellent screen shots! Please continue showing them!!
I think your premise is entirely possible; but, the British public is so committed to the idea of a foreign holiday/travel, that I think is will take some time for incidents like this to percolate down to the general population, UNLESS the media joins in and urges people not to fly; OR the expense becomes overwhelming, which given the way things are going, is entirely possible. And then, of course, people become too ill to wish to travel. I increasingly see lethargy and exhaustion in some of the jabbed, not all, which speaks to the difference in the content of the vials, but some. It is so sad to see they have no idea why they feel this way. A neighbour recently told me “they” say we might “get covid” four times a year, and believed it. There is little one can do or say. I suggest Vit D and explain that most of those very ill are also very low in Vit D. This limited amount of advice is sometimes accepted.
I’d an interesting conversation today D’, with a woman who used to work with my wife. Christine. Her new neighbour was rushed to hospital with a suspected heart attack two weeks ago. He got stents fitted and was sent home. A blood clot then moved to, or formed in his leg causing no circulation and necessitating the removal of ?toes. It’s weird she said as he’s had all his shots, and he was ok until recently. Then Russia. They wouldn’t like it if they were invaded, and they’re sometimes shooting kids, they wouldn’t like it, etc etc. Anyway, thank God they got rid of covis(sic), it was a bloody nightmare, aye it cost a fortune, (I’d told her how much was wasted/spent) but it was worth it. Anyway tell Jinty I was aking for her. I will Christine, take care love.
Well done on suggesting vitamin D, especially with our overlords geoengineering away our sunshine making it necessary even this time of year. I might add to that magnesium and zinc. Magnesium and zinc important for many functions of our bodies, immune systems and minds. For one, they hel make the vitamin D more effective and combines to make our immune system much more effective and our minds more energetic, clearer and sharper compared to when we’re deficient of them. You may just see your dim neighbor becoming brighter if he follows your advice. In addition to being scientically proven to be that way, I personally know of it happening. The father of a friend of mine was very lethargic and a blind believer of mainstream media. After my friend convinced him to try some supplements (D, C, B complex, omega 3, magnesium, zinc) and soon after he became more energetic and became more receptive to facts about covid and the vax and even began thinking critically and question things himself.
No wonder they try to discredit and demonize these supplements and keep people ignorant about good nutrition (which isn’t all that good nowadays due to industrial farming as well as other reasons, making supplements necessary even with good nutrition.)
It’s not always that people are receptive though. A lot of people have been fooled into believing vitamin and mineral supplements are useless or even harmful. Like a friend of my mother. I talked my mother into trying some supplements (same cocktail as my friends dad got) as well as to avoid harmful seed oils like canola. The effect was like night and day. My mother is more energetic and stronger than I remember her being even 20 years ago and she’s lost some conditions and ailments that she had before. Her hair loss basically stopped. She’s never sick more than slightly (just like me, haven’t been sick more than feeling under the weather and or having slight cold “symptoms” for a couple of days a few times since bettering my diet and starting on supplements in early 2020.) Before, she was sick fairly often (as was I.) She’s also lost quite a bit of weight and even more girth (thanks mostly to cutting out the canola oil and such, which cause obesity. At her last doctor’s checkup she had lost 20 cm on her waist in just a couple of months.
Her friend, on the other hand is a leftist blind system believer who religiously follows all advice and recommendations from “science” and the government. As such, she’s obese, very frail and needs a walker to walk (despite being some years younger than my mom.) She’s of course triple vaxxed. Despite seeing my mother just get healthier and more energetic (while heading the other direction herself) she’s conviced that the supplements are dangerous and that they’ve caused a slight liver problem my mother has. She also tries to shame my mother into getting vaxxed, claiming that she’s “not taking responsibility and that she (who’s never sick) risk making others (her) sick.
Some are so brainwashed by the (globalist) State, and particularily its pharma cult, that they either won’t or can’t see the plainly obvious and instead chose to remain inside their learned delusions.
The way I see it happening is that we’ll have some more of these airliner sabotages and then they’ll have their media begin to call attention and ask questions about it and media and experts will point to Russia. Then after maybe a few more there’ll be a major crash. Then there’ll be a moratorium on public air travel “to protect the public” “until safety can be restored.”
Then we’ll be hearing how beneficial the air travel moratorium has been “for the climate” and there will be calls from “journalists” and “experts” to make it permanent. Then they’ll have their politicians (actors and useful idiots) make it permanant based on that and the effects of the geoengineering (like decimated crops and forest fires) which, of course, will be claimed to be effects of “climate change.”
How will they make steel for the trains and electric cars? No shipping, how can it be imported? Must be a very reduced population as we import most of our food. Join Extinction Recruits now chaps.
Their evil plan will obviously exclude all of ‘luxuries’ nixon. If this agenda ever succeeds, we’ll be far worse off in terms of standard of living and quality of life (for those unfortunate enough to live long enough to experience any of it), than were our middle ages feudal society ancestors!
At least they were ‘allowed’ to eat meat and use fire for cooking and warmth.
It’s now patently obvious that this diabolical plan is ultimately about extinction of the human species.
Think: semi-human droids don’t need any of those things to exist, not even food.
I wonder if our fellow totally dumbed-down fellows will still possess enough common sense to realize that that is a ridiculous analogy. The ‘behaviours’ mentioned are indeed unhealthy and some even life threatening. The obvious difference is warning that such named negative behaviours are unhealthy and even dangerous: is TRUE.
Conversely: the imagined threat of anthropogenic ‘climate change’ and the alleged catastrophic effects of carbon emissions is 100 percent hokum, thus NOT true and therefore, should be treated with the contempt it deserves and ridiculed as the total junk science it is. Therefore must be IGNORED.
Unfortunately they’re already stupid enough now, so their meticulous indoctrination plan to convince the stupid sheep to accept this death sentence for all of humanity will most likely succeed. By the turn of the century, the only semblance of humanity that might remain will be AI powered and AI created artificial humans or ‘Androids’.
Carbon Dioxide is essential to all life on planet Earth and the Davos gang know that too, so it’s almost obvious now that these Malthusians hate us to such an extent that they want to completely exterminate the human being as a species. Created by God in His image and replace us with their monstrous creations, believing that these things will be a ‘superior model’ and believe that they are BETTER than God and can manage the world better than He ever could.
No. ‘Psychopath’ does not even begin to describe what these despicable satanic creatures are and they are already in full control now.