Mariupol zoo keeping small animals safe. Big animals getting hit by shrapnel and dying.

Russian flag flies over Central Mariupol in silent environment.  Patrick asks locals what really happened at the theatre.

Russian TV arrives in Mariupol and asks locals what they lived through.  Russian TV describes Ukrainian fake news endlessly broadcast day by day, which is repeated by Western media.  Ukrainians try to provoke Belarus with a missile attack, and other humiliations.


11 Responses to “Mariupol zoo keeping small animals safe. Big animals getting hit by shrapnel and dying.”

  1. Aldous says:

    It gets worse – if that was ever possible.
    I’ll try to find the link to the horrors that took place in Dresden 1945 when escaped zoo animals along with men, women and children were being mercilessly strafed.
    God seems to be revenging it.

  2. Aldous says:

    Pictures of Dresden Before and After the WWII Bombing

    Winston Churchill categorized the killing of innocent people in Dresden “terror bombing,” – and terrifying it was. Flames engulfed the entire city. The unimaginable heat completely vaporized small children. Civilians who took shelter underground melted into liquid and bones.

    • Tapestry says:

      Miles Mathis compared photographs of pre-war Dresden with post-war Dresden and found no difference, and the buildings were not new. As with all ‘news’, all you know is that someone told you of something. Only if you were there in person do you actually know. That’s why the only war reporting of any value is on the spot reporting as with Patrick Lancaster.

      • Aldous says:

        Well I’ve never been to the Moon Tap but I know for near certain that no one else has either.
        I have a very good education and understanding of physics and stuff and can tell you with all certainty that travel by Man or Woman to the Moon is an absolute impossibility.
        The firebombing of Germany happened and Dresden was one of them and just about the worst as the war was lost with Dresden jam-packed with fleeing refugees.
        War crimes happen all the time but Dresden has got to count in the Top Ten.

  3. Aldous says:

    Dresden set the standard and benchmark for future Zio terror attacks.
    The initial attack is designed to cause as much death and destruction as inhumanly possible but that is just for starters.
    Once the emergency services move in to help and save who they can, the next wave of terror arrives to deal with them as well. But there’s more.
    Once that second wave has done its stuff, along comes the third wave to mop up what’s left, including zoo animals like giraffes etc, along with what’s left of humanity cowering on riverbanks thinking they might just be safe there.
    Zionist scum and their apologists deserve to rot in Hell.

    • ian says:

      Indeed they do Aldous. Trouble is, it seems that real history like the happenings in Dresden that you recalled, have to be looked for with intent to find the truth. Unfortunately most get their history from Hollywood and TV. Our leaders =Good, Enemy of the month=Bad.
      Kissinger pointed this out, when said that the truth doesn’t matter, it’s what’s perceived to be the truth that matters.

      • pete fairhurst says:

        Certainly looked at with intent, Ian. Here is an alternative take on Dresden

      • ian says:

        Thanks pete. Interesting. Not trying to be disrespectful, but I’m not a fan of Miles Mathis. He claims everything is fake. I’m sure that the British government would like it to be fake, but I still think that it was real. There are films from the bombers showing the firestorm on the ground, and who exactly would have faked it in the first place. Hellstorm shows a quite convincing take on it too. Obviously no one who wasn’t there can be 100% on what occurred but I’m still on the firestorm side.

      • pete fairhurst says:

        Nothing disrespectful about having a different view Ian, we are all entitled to that. I’m not saying Mathis is correct, this is one of his weaker arguments I think. He has done much more convincing stuff on other subjects

        But his paper does make me wonder just how much of this official Dresden history is real. How would we know anyway, the official history is always written by the winners isn’t it. And the winners in war usually have a lot to hide, or distort

        The first casualty of war is always the truth. Just look at the Ukraine conflict, lies, lies and more lies, all round. As Tap says the only reliable witnesses are the ones actually there. Even then there is no way to really know. Images are not real, they are just pixels in computers. They can easily be made to show what the propagandist wants to show to make his case. The Bucha bodies are just bodies in the street. No way to know if they were actually dead, never mind who killed them if they were

      • ian says:

        I agree pete. You can’t know anything for sure about these things. I’m busy re-reading the Quintinshill Conspiracy, a book that asks many questions about the incident that were never asked at the official enquiry. It makes fascinating reading. The Quintinshill area where it happened is only half a mile or so from where I live. We are constantly assessing and rethinking information, and it never gets boring.

      • ian says:

        BTW I’m referring to the Quintinshill rail disaster from WW1.