MP refuses to answer Questions on Case 6029679/21 – “It would be inappropriate to comment on a Live Criminal Investigation”

 Sun 10:56 am +00:00, 13 Feb 2022  

posted by Weaver

In a response to a constituent who had contacted him regarding the Criminal Case number 6029679/21 a Member of Parliament replied, “Thank you for contacting me recently regarding a criminal complaint that was lodged with the Metropolitan Police in December, with allegations made against various Government ministers and officials, as well as members of the media.”

The MP from Halesowen and Regis, James Morris continued, “As these allegations are now subject to a live criminal investigation, it would be inappropriate for me to comment on them further.”

What he is referring to is the complaint that was formally lodged on Monday 20 December 2021, with the Metropolitan Police (London and Greater London) at Hammersmith Police Station, London. The complaint was made by Philip Hyland, a lawyer from PJH law, Lois Bayliss, a lawyer from Broad Yorkshire Law, Dr Samuel White, a medical doctor, and Mark Sexton, a former police officer.

by a team including retired police constable Mark Sexton and lawyers Lois Bayliss and Philip Hyland to the Metropolitan Police in Hammersmith, London, UK, requesting the immediate halt of the experimental vaccine roll-out pending Police forensic examination.

The team has brought the complaint of alleged offences of Corporate Manslaughter and Gross Criminal Manslaughter against defendants including:

• AstraZeneca
• Pfizer
• Moderna
• National Health Service (NHS)
• Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency (MHRA)
• Joint Committee of Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI)
• Her Majesty’s Government.

The Background

The UK government began the rollout of the “COVID vaccines” in early 2021, the said vaccines received a temporary Emergency Authorisation (EUA) under regulation 174 of the Human Medicine Regulations Act (2012).

The vaccine trials are still ongoing and not due to conclude until late 2022 or early 2023. The treatments have no long-term human safety data available, and only one year of short-term data. This has shown that the treatment does not prohibit infection of the virus which is termed “COVID-19” nor do they prohibit any transmission of any disease.

In fact, there have been multiple reports of adverse effects and deaths attributed to the treatment.

The criminal case, despite many individuals feeling disgruntled due to their local police force claiming they have no knowledge of it, is actually gaining traction.

This week the police were in receipt of an interim forensic report showing analysis of the four most utilised vials of vaccine from Morena x2, Astra Zeneca, and Pfizer (source)

The report concluded that there is now definitive proof of the inclusion of:

1. Graphene nano ribbons coated with Polyethylene Glycol
2. Graphene Composite Form 1.
3. Graphene Composite Form 2.
4. Microcrystalline Calcite with Carbonaceous inclusions.
5. Graphene Nano Form with and without fluorescence
6. Graphene nano objects
7. Graphene nano scrolls.

The summary of findings of the toxicology report:

The Police Submission States

The first and foremost duty of the Police is the protection of life. It is therefore incumbent on the Police that they take action to halt the roll-out of these experimental treatments immediately and until their own forensic investigations have been completed.

Again, there are reasonable grounds for doing this. The main potential defendants in this matter, as listed above, preclude them from conducting any investigation themselves. It is a matter for the Police only.

The fact that Member of Parliament James Morris was not able to respond, is therefore further proof that the Criminal Case is in fact being treated in the manner it deserves and is being investigated.