Technocracy is not Fascism/Communism and has no leader |

Technocracy is not Fascism/Communism and has no leader

Sat 1:51 pm +01:00, 25 Dec 2021

posted by Tapestry

As individualists for the most part, Conservatives are scared to death of Socialism. As collectivists, Socialists are scared to death of falling short of the ‘common good’. Each group has a unique and strikingly different belief system and supporting logic.

Those who believe that Socialism (or Communism) is the bogeyman just can’t get it out of their head. I have sat down with intelligent people and carefully gone through the following table of comparisons, and they have eagerly nodded their heads in agreement. But the next day they revert right back to talking about the dangers of Socialism and Communism. Were they just not paying attention? Were they being disingenuous and only pretending to agree with me? Probably neither.

The fact is, old habits of thinking and acting are very hard to change. All of us struggle to some degree when we are challenged with new thoughts that require a shift in our existing belief system. If we believe that Socialism or Communism is the biggest enemy of the state, we will be very resistant to any facts to the contrary.

It is true that the trappings of former political systems are still visible in certain countries. China still has the hammer and sickle. Germany still has a few neo-Nazis running around. But how many times have we ever been told, “Don’t judge a book by its cover”? Times change. Things change. Our thinking about them must advance as well. Holding a world view from 10, 20 or 30 years ago is simply not adequate today.

With that said, I was hoping hope to change readers’ mindsets when I wrote in Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, “The dark horse of the New World Order is not Communism, Socialism or Fascism: It is Technocracy.”

The ancient Chinese General Sun Tsu, who wrote The Art of War in the 6th century BC, noted that the enemy must be clearly identified before victory can be achieved. This is still true today. Technocrats smile inwardly when you call them Communists, Socialists or Fascists because this allows them to continue on their way unthreatened and uninterrupted.

Here are 25 comparisons that make the proper distinction between Technocracy, Communism/Socialism and Fascism. To correctly cement the features of each ideology into your worldview, I suggest reading and contemplating this list every day for 30 days straight.

TECHNOCRACY	COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM	FASCISM
Endgame: Scientific Dictatorship	Endgame: Classless society	Endgame: National strength
Hates Communists, favored Fascists	Hates Fascists & Technocrats	Hates all types of Marxists
Has contempt for electoral democracy	Promotes electoral democracy	Has contempt for electoral democracy
Seeks totalitarian system by scientific methods	Seeks totalitarian system by communitarianism	Seeks totalitarian system by nationalistic submission
Relies upon cult of science (Scientism)	Relies upon cult of personality (Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Che)	Relies upon cult of personality (Hitler, Mussolini)
Promotes Scientism	Promotes atheism	Promotes a form of Christianity
Promotes cities, is anti-rural	Promotes rural development	Anti-urban, promotes rural identity
Replaces Capitalism with resource-based economic system	Managed Capitalism	Generally supports Capitalism for its own purposes
Despises Capitalism	Marx believed Capitalism was a necessary step to Communism	Viewed as a ‘third way’ between Capitalism and Communism
Apolitical	Mostly viewed as ‘left wing’	Often viewed as ‘conservative’
Racially agnostic	Stalin condemned anti-Semitism	Tends toward anti-Semitism and racism
Highly reveres intellectuals who agree with them	Killed intellectuals in their own countries, on multiple occasions	Killed intellectuals in other countries
Generally pacifist	Mostly killed their own citizens	Mostly killed citizens of other countries, plus Jews and other ‘undesirables’
Controls people with the system/technology	Controls people with people	Controls people with dictator
Population: over-populated	Population: non-issue	Population: non-issue
Genetic cleansing, general population reduction	Ideological cleansing	Genetic cleansing, but selective
Universal Basic Income (UBI)	Stratified pay structure, according to the need of each citizen	Stratified pay structure, according to merit and value to leadership
Advances according to the advancement of technology	Advances according to the development of ideology	Advances according to the strength of the nation
Human conditioning to live within the system	Education supports ideology	Education supports nationalism
Global citizen, city-state oriented	Nation-state oriented	Nation-state oriented
Dissolves the state	Empowers the state	Empowers the state
Science knows best	People know best	People know best
Social engineers hide behind facade of science	Leadership easily identified	Leadership easily identified
“Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…” (The Technocrat, 1938) Eradicates profit completely and all private property, establishes a resource-based economy controlled by a scientific elite using data-driven scientific method.	Communism: Political and economic doctrine that aims to replace private property and a profit-based economy with public ownership and communal control of at least the major means of production (e.g., mines, mills, and factories) and the natural resources of a society. (Encyclopedia Britannica)	Fascism, a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. (Merriam-Webster)A political regime, having totalitarian aspirations, ideologically based on a relationship between business and the centralized government, business-and-government control of the marketplace, repression of criticism or opposition, a leader cult and exalting the state and/or religion above individual rights. By extension, Any system of strong autocracy or oligarchy usually to the extent of bending and breaking the law, race-baiting and violence against largely unarmed populations. (Wikitionary)
”We are building this global society without a global leader. Global order is no longer something that can be dictated or controlled from the top down. Globalization is itself the order.” Dr. Parag Khanna	Stepping-stone to Technocracy Zbigniew Brzezinski stated in Between Two Ages: America’s Role In the Technetronic Era (1970), that Communism and Socialism were necessary stepping stones to get to the end game, but they were not the end game in themselves. The final stage was to be Brzezinski’s Technetronic Era, which is Technocracy