U.K.’s Biggest Source of Greenhouse Gas is an ‘Eco’ Power Station

A ‘green’ power station subsidised with taxpayers’ money is Britain’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gas, according to new research. The Daily Mail has more.

Drax in Yorkshire burns wood pellets, which are treated as a ‘renewable’ fuel and the site has attracted more than £800 million of taxpayer subsidies.

But analysis shows that the burning of wood for power – known as biomass – has been the cause of more carbon dioxide emissions than coal since 2019.

Drax burns millions of tonnes of wood to provide around 12% of the UK’s total electric power, generating 15.6 megatonnes (Mt) of carbon dioxide emissions each year, which cause the planet to heat up by trapping heat around the Earth – the greenhouse effect.

The power station is also one of the top five emitters in Europe of toxic air pollution particles known as PM10.

Currently accounting rules allow Drax to be treated as ‘carbon neutral’.

It is argued that emissions from burning wood are offset by the growth of new trees to replace those harvested for burning – although trees burnt may have taken 40-100 years to reach maturity.

This assumption, shared by the EU and UK Government makes it eligible for significant public subsidy.

But scientific opinion is changing, and wood burning is increasingly seen as making climate change worse. The European Academies Science Advisory Council states that using woody biomass for power “is not effective in mitigating climate change and may even increase the risk of dangerous climate change”.

The research from pressure group Ember also shows emissions from burning wood now far exceed those from burning coal. Wood burning is now the second largest contributor to the power sector’s CO2 emissions overall after fossil gas.

Worth reading in full.

Stop Press: Andrew Neil says the cost of the Government’s ‘net zero’ policy is finally hitting home. The Daily Mail has more.


3 Responses to “U.K.’s Biggest Source of Greenhouse Gas is an ‘Eco’ Power Station”

  1. ian says:

    The only carbon released from burning wood is carbon that the tree removed from the atmosphere to start with, and so it is basically carbon neutral. Given however, that the climate change scam is their plan, it looks like log burners and bonfires are for the kibosh. Given also that tons of CO2 gobbling trees are cut down to make paper, then in theory the Daily Mail should go too.

  2. sovereigntea says:

    No longer fed on British coal we enrich the US & become dependent on their shipped across the Atlantic biomass & polluted … Oh yeah “to save the planet”. SCAM ! and our quisling politicians are complicit.

    Drax receives 100th biomass cargo from dedicated US export facility

    Drax has received the 100th cargo of sustainable biomass from its dedicated US export facility at the port of Baton Rouge in Louisiana, marking an important milestone in five years of its operation supplying the renewable fuel to the UK’s largest power station.

  3. pete fairhurst says:

    “Currently accounting rules allow Drax to be treated as ‘carbon neutral’.”

    Do they now? How revealing. How about changing those “accounting rules” then?

    Never use/trust accountants for anything like this, the last place that they should be allowed operate is anything to do with strategy, or tactics. Their job is simply to dress up the numbers to match the story that the owners want to deliver