Use of experimental jabs on children not justified says JCVI

Intro by Watchdog

The following is extracted from a report by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization.

You can read the full report at the link below.

We’ve selected the extracts because they amount to an admission of what many have been saying, namely and in a nutshell, that we do not yet know the extent of long term effects the experimental pseudo vaccines have  upon the health of a child (or indeed anyone for that matter) and the risks of COVID19 for young people are so low that such experimentation upon children is not even remotely justified.

The report on the whole is pretty feeble considering the health of children is at stake but at least it does, however insipidly, recognise the key issues stated above and, whether intentionally or not, casts suspicion upon the government’ true motivations behind its drive to inject children with these substances for no reasons that make any rational sense.

Key points are (of course) missed from this report, such as:

The fact that not a single person under  20 has died of COVID19 this year.

No mention is made of the several safe, cheap and highly successful remedies that exist and in the hands of competent doctors have reduced COVID19 fatalities to near zero where used, even among “at risk” groups with other serious illnesses.

The fact that the COV19 “vaccines” have already produced short term adverse reactions and fatalities by the tens of  thousands – far more than any new vaccines in history. This is to such an extent that two of the planet’s most vaccinated areas, Gibraltar and Israel, are already experiencing a surge of illness in the vaccinated. Whilst the long term effects are not yet known and their full effects will only been seen in the vaccinated over the ensuing years, the sheer extent and severity of the immediate-term health issues (not predicted in the skimped vax trials) do not bode well for the longer term.

In light of these facts any further attempt by government to jab children with these agents to “protect” them from an illness that is no threat, whilst withholding the known, safe remedies, will be seen for what it is: a subversive attack on the nation’s future adults.


JCVI issues updated advice on COVID-19 vaccination of children aged 12 to 15

The JCVI has reviewed the evidence on vaccinating children aged 12 to 15 who do not have underlying health conditions that put them at increased risk from severe COVID-19.

The assessment by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) is that the health benefits from vaccination are . . . considered too small to support universal vaccination of healthy 12 to 15 year olds at this time.

For the vast majority of children, SARS-CoV-2 infection is asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic and will resolve without treatment. Of the very few children aged 12 to 15 years who require hospitalisation, the majority have underlying health conditions.

There is evidence of an association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis . . .  The medium- to long-term effects are unknown and long-term follow-up is being conducted.

Given the very low risk of serious COVID-19 disease in otherwise healthy 12 to 15 year olds, . . . a precautionary approach was agreed.

. . . When deciding on childhood immunisations, the JCVI has consistently maintained that the main focus should be the benefits to children themselves, balanced against any potential harms to them from vaccination.

As longer-term data on potential adverse reactions accumulates, greater certainty may allow for a reconsideration of the benefits and harms. This data may not be available for several months.


The People’s Media


Use of experimental jabs on children not justified says JCVI