Choose your fear: what should you be scared of at the moment? YOU decide!


Intro by Jon Davy

The following is from HART, the Health Advisory and Recovery Team.

HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts who came together over shared concerns about policy and guidance recommendations relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.

It seems sometimes that being scared is our civic duty and life would not be worth living if we were not scared of something so it is very kind of those nice psychopaths running the country to keep us supplied with an abundance of things to be frightened about.

So what should we be scared of?

An alleged virus mis-identified by a now-discredited test that cannot distinguish it from ordinary flu and which has in any case an average age of fatality in the UK of 83?

Or a government that cynically misrepresents it and its stats in a smoke-and-mirrors operation to terrify you into submitting to being injected with experimental chemicals that are now killing and injuring British citizens in increasing numbers?

The choice is yours.

This article from the good people at HART might help you make your choice. It was published a few days before the CDC came out and admitted the PCR test governments have been using not only can’t be used to diagnose disease but also can’t distinguish between Covid and flu, which means of course thousands of the “Covid cases” it fraudulently mis-identified, if they were sick at all, probably had a dose of the flu.

One of the most startling revelations of the article is the government is STILL taking advice from the oft-discredited Ferguson famed for his wrong predictions!


What should we be scared of at the moment?

 July 22, 2021

Pessimistic forecasts proved wrong again

The reason to fear pandemics is that they cause excess deaths. Deaths in England have been below expected levels for nearly five months now. However, it makes sense to look for earlier signs in other data such as hospitalisations or cases.

Hospitalisations (with patients testing positive) have certainly been increasing but are at half the level predicted in the SAGE “central scenario” and are 17% lower than their most optimistic predictions. Overall COVID-19 patients currently occupy 2.6% of NHS beds with 7.9% of beds remaining empty. So there is no need to be scared of the NHS being imminently overwhelmed.

Cases are continuing to rise in England. However, in Scotland they have peaked and are falling and are now at only half their peak.

Symptomatic cases are more meaningful than positive PCR test results, because people continue to test positive up to 90 days after an infection. The Zoe App records data from a large sample of the country based on symptoms. That data shows that symptomatic cases are reaching their peak.

Data from the Zoe app shows that cases in the unvaccinated started to fall at the beginning of July, while cases in the vaccinated continued to rise. One explanation for this is due to there being more cases in the young earlier on, and the old being affected more recently. Unless something terrible happens to the vaccinated, they too should peak soon and start to fall.

Incidentally, the Zoe App noted that there are currently more symptomatic cases in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Therefore, assuming equal infectiousness, a person is more likely to catch SARS-CoV-2 from someone who is vaccinated than not vaccinated, making the entire premise of vaccine passports untenable. Nor is there any need to single out and be scared of the unvaccinated.

Unless England’s trajectory ends up being very different to Scotland or something unexpected happens to the vaccinated, then there’s every reason to expect a fall in case numbers in England in the next week, when the picture should be much clearer.

The fear pushers and their models have failed again with their pessimistic forecasts. Independent Sage’s prediction, from the beginning of July, of 110,000 cases by 19 July, was three times higher than cases actually seen in the real world. Neil Ferguson continues to outperform everyone else on pessimism; his latest prediction is that cases will peak at 200,000 per day with 2,000 hospital admissions a day, a similar level to the lead up to Christmas. Journalists and politicians have a lot of time for these pessimists. The fact that alternative views are censored and suppressed and the people behind them attacked may be more reason to be worried than the forecasts themselves.

The scariest thing is that people are still listening to him while censoring other views.


People’s Media News Dashboard


2 Responses to “Choose your fear: what should you be scared of at the moment? YOU decide!”

  1. ihunt says:

    As for the history, there is nothing to say. We will give our own history to the cattle, and show that the entire human evolution was moving towards the recognition of the God’s chosen nation of Jews to be masters over the entire world.
    When you buy your ticket you pay both the good guys and the bad guys. The success of the presentation depends on the ability of the theatrical company to get the audience wrapped up in the plot. The greater the audience participation the greater the success. Real success is achieved when the audience becomes so emotionally involved in the plot that they begin to think it’s the real thing. The profits from these theatrical extravaganzas go to those who put up the ‘seed’ money and stage the shows. Don’t misunderstand! The Americans, Canadians, English, Germans, Russians, Japanese and other nationalities who fought and died in the various theaters of war’ during this century weren’t play-acting. They were deadly serious about what they were doing. FTo them war was a life and death struggle. What few of them realized was that everything was carefully programmed to a carefully prepared script.p54

  2. Mick says:

    I can’t decide what I’m more afraid of: Covid, or robot werewolves with laser eyes and gnashing teeth.