Foreshadowing humanity’s future, the publication Eco Watch put out the headline in March titled Lockdown-Size Emission Cuts are Needed Every Two Years to Combat Climate Crisis. The report details how “lockdown measures to stop the spread of the coronavirus pandemic had the added benefit of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.” globally, showing the direction that all of this is headed.
“This is the largest emissions reduction that has ever been recorded,” the piece maintains. “But to reach the Paris agreement goal of limiting global warming to well below two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, the world needs to reduce emissions by one to two billion metric tons every year for the next decade and beyond…”
The out-of-control rhetoric originally comes from a 2021 Nature Climate Change white paper titled Fossil CO2 emissions in the post-COVID-19 era that explains that “pervasive disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic have radically altered the trajectory of global CO2 emissions.” In a nutshell, scientists learned that global lockdowns drastically reduced global carbon emissions, and the press uses it to their advantage. But, remember who owns and/or controls the press. This all runs lockstep with what the ruling class has already planned for our futures. Just as the paper affirms, elected bureaucrats will use “new policy choices to sustain a decline in global emissions in the post-COVID-19 era.” It’s all part of the plan and a far bigger picture.
The plan sounds good on the surface, but it’s not and gets complicated
In 2020, emissions fell globally 7% due to the lockdowns, cutting carbon by about 2.6 billion tonnes. Although these statistics sound good on the surface, it appears that a whole new can of worms has been opened. A recent report out of The Guardian says that “reductions of between 1bn and 2bn tonnes are needed every year of the next decade to have a good chance of holding temperature rises to within 1.5C or 2C of pre-industrial levels, as required by the Paris agreement.”
Where this is all headed
If you truly weigh it out, it only stands to reason that the coronavirus and subsequent lockdowns were only merely a beta test for what’s to come: more lockdowns and more control. Governments want to rule with an iron fist, and that’s what they are doing. The question is: how long will people go along with it?
Adding cause for concern, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) says the COVID-19 crisis is “interconnected” with climate change and “will exacerbate the social and economic problems highlighted by the pandemic” if humans don’t stop driving privately-owned vehicles, using electricity, and consuming red meat. The new hidden theme in the press this week shows the depths these people will go to achieve their agenda, which also seems to segway in with doomsday, the end of the world-style talk.
“Shifting Arctic ice, raging wildfires in western US states and elsewhere, and methane leaks in the North Sea are all warning signs that we are approaching a tipping point on climate change, when protecting the future of civilization will require dramatic interventions,” writes Mariana Mazzacato. “Under a ‘climate lockdown,’ governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling. To avoid such a scenario, we must overhaul our economic structures and do capitalism differently.”
And while it’s likely climate chaos will be magnified by the media and those of influence to usher in the one-world agenda faster, we should not discount the fact that something could be lurking on the horizon. (i.e., a major space weather event, asteroid strike, abrupt earth change, or natural disaster)
Stay frosty, my friends.