There is still no evidence that a COVID virus exists. Vaccine effects (flu and COVID jabs) and flu name change are enough to explain it all.

The FDA cover-up that led to the approval of the Pfizer vaccine
by Jon Rappoport
As I’ve been documenting for the past year, the COVID experts have been contradicting themselves six ways from Sunday. As charlatans, they’re abject failures. They can’t keep their own story straight.
Thanks to an alert reader, I’ve come across a new blockbuster.
BY THEIR OWN STANDARDS, the FDA should never have allowed the Pfizer COVID vaccine to be shot into a single arm. The Agency’s Emergency Use Authorization was a crime—according to their own data.
Here we go.
The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.”
It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.
A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”
Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.
The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than no vaccine at all—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.
To make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the vaccine clinical trial.
The researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some volunteers.
The billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?
If it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success. It protected people against the virus.
But as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn’t the case at all.
So now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just quoted: “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases].”
“Well, you see, we can’t say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. They’re in limbo. We want to keep them in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and we’ll never get approval for the vaccine.”
What does “suspected cases” mean? It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.
However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?
Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.
By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.
That’s the way cases are counted.
These several thousand volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either COVID-19 cases or they weren’t. Which is it?
The official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to throw the data from all those suspected cases in the garbage and ignore them. Poof. Gone.
Why do I say that?
Because if the FDA had paid serious attention to the several thousand “suspected cases,” they never would have authorized the vaccine for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.
Which they didn’t.
This is called a crime.
“But…but it’s not that simple. This is a complex situation. It’s a gray area.”
“No. It isn’t. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug, nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was supposed to cure, wouldn’t you cancel the trial and go back to the drawing board?”
“You mean if we were being honest? That’s a joke, right? We’re not honest. Don’t you get it?”
Yes. I get it. You’re criminals. Killers.
But wait. There’s more. The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.
In fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a slippery comment: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”
Translation: You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting to the vaccine. So we’re going to ignore this whole mess and pretend it’s of no importance.
Back in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine groups of their clinical trials.
It’s called cooking the data. It’s a way of writing off and ignoring COVID symptoms in the vaccine group—and instead saying, “The vaccine is safe and effective.”
And the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a category called “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases,” and throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.
I’m speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.
Unless fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the vaccine were and are the true goals.
Finally: When you have “suspected cases,” and their ultimate status depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each “suspected case” becomes an actual case or no case at all.
Perhaps these “suspected cases” in the clinical trial were tested, and many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID cases—but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they were tested.
Or if you really don’t want to know whether “suspected cases” are actual cases, you don’t test them. You leave them in a convenient limbo and park them, never to be seen again.
Either way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the test. Saying “we don’t know” is nothing more than a con and a hustle.
I’d love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one. Here is how the conversation might go:
“So you’re saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn’t be adjudicated one way or another?”
“That’s right. Their PCR tests were ‘indeterminate’.”
“That says something devastating about the test itself.”
“Well, sometimes you just can’t tell whether it’s positive or negative.”
“I see. And this ‘indeterminate’ result occurred in SEVERAL THOUSAND suspected cases.”
“I guess so, yes.”
“You know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases. A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for the virus itself in a more direct way.”
“No. That wouldn’t work.”
“Why not?”
“Because…the actual virus…”
“Because no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
“So tell me—what does that indicate? I’ll tell you what it indicates. You can’t prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists.
“I have to go. I’m late for a meeting.”
“You’re late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?’
“Absolutely not. That’s outrageous.”
“What then?”
“The PO Box is in Virginia.”
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here — with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
Use this link to order Jon’s Matrix Collections.

7 Responses to “There is still no evidence that a COVID virus exists. Vaccine effects (flu and COVID jabs) and flu name change are enough to explain it all.”

    • Alan Vaughn says:

      Excellent! ?
      Here’s another Irish lady that EVERYONE needs to follow:–lockdown:5
      If they did, the great Covid Megahoax would go legs up within a couple of days.
      If this forthright little grandmother who knows her rights and still respects herself can do it, why the hell can’t the rest of you?
      Grow a spine and stop cowering to these nobodies that are only where they are thanks to YOU! You don’t deserve this so tell them so, via en masse civil disobedience.
      For God’s sake, STOP COMPLYIING! EVERYONE MUST disobey any and ALL of their dehumanizing diktats. It is our ONLY hope of ever reclaiming our God-given freedom and human rights.

  1. Gordon says:

    Matt Hancock is a LIAR and should have been fired for at least 15-20 things – says Dominic Cummings

    • Alan Vaughn says:

      Yawn… ?
      Yes indeed, overwhelming and undeniable evidence that there was never a ‘deadly pandemic’, let alone any life threatening event, or scenario which justified their economy wrecking and society destroying and life destroying response; from March 2020 to the present day.
      Those statistics, back in the days when the world was ‘normal’, would normally have been more than enough evidence to find him and his humanity loathing comrades guilty of lying to parliament and to the electorate, plus, guilty of mass genocide. Then, having been found guilty beyond reasonable doubt of said crimes against humanity: publicly executed.
      However, because it’s now 2021 – the era of the anti-humanity ‘new normal’, and they are ‘all in this together’, they won’t even be asked to explain themselves, let alone be held to account for their joint act of mass murder and demolition of our once great Western society.

      Frankly, I don’t know why we even bother reporting on any of this stuff – it’s a waste of time: nothing will ever be done about it until such time the remaining 90% of our brain-dead, collaborating fellow citizens wake the f*** up and ditch their hideous dehumanizing slave-muzzles and refuse en mass to obey any and all of their oppressive diktats.
      Can’t see that happening anytime soon. It’s utterly hopeless.
      Instead of doing what should be obvious to anyone with a functional brain, they organize pointless protest marches in major cities, which achieve nothing other than provide a perfect opportunity for the lying and treasonous mainstream media to very publicly: further shame, scapegoat and denigrate us as ‘dangerous, deluded conspiracy theorists’ who were seen ‘spreading bizarre misinformation’. And that’s only if they actually bother to report on such protests at all.
      The TV indoctrinated muzzled morons who lock themselves in their homes in their permanent state of fear of the covid boogie man and watch TV all day long, love those stories too! So why do these ‘freedom fighters’ go out and make fools of themselves, for the entertainment of brainless and obedient fools who are really to blame for the whole dilemma, owing to their willing and gleeful compliance?
      These protest marches are NOT the answer.
      The only way we will ever reclaim our God-given freedom and human rights is through en mass civil disobedience and non-compliance to ALL of their mandates, by every oppressed citizen, at all times.

      • Aldous says:

        Hi Alan. I read your post with much interest.
        My wife and I are among the ‘lucky ones'(sic) who have benefited somewhat from the Great Scamdemic of All Time in that we have been under virtual House Arrest and unable to wine and dine in our twilight years – and get hopelessly ‘wrecked’ – as is often the usual case.
        Consequently, our bank balances have skyrocketed while trying to drink ourselves to a slow and soulless death indoors.
        I am very wary of knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing.

        I don’t go with public executions any more but prefer terminations with extreme prejudice, out of sight and out of mind as it were.
        Better still, let’s give the Hancock monster the Sisyphus Treatment because there are a lot of things in (eternal) life far worse than death:

      • Hey you says:

        If there’s going to be executions, I go with the George Carlin approach