The CDC’s “Crimes Against Humanity” for Allowing 12 to 15 Year-Olds to be Injected with COVID Bioweapon Shots

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Many honest doctors and scientists have now come forward to explain that the experimental new COVID shots are “bioweapons,” and that is the term I am going to start using when referring to them.

As we have reported over the past several months, these shots do not meet the legal definition of a “vaccine.” See:

Dr. David Martin on Experimental mRNA COVID Vaccines: This is NOT a Vaccine! It is a Medical Device

They were issued emergency use authorization illegally to test on the public, because the COVID-19 “virus,” or at least the people who get sick with symptoms related to the definition of “COVID-19”, have multiple treatment options to successfully cure this sickness, making a new, novel pharmaceutical product to be tested on the public completely unnecessary. See:

CENSORED: Dr. Peter McCullough, MD testifies How Successful Home Treatments for COVID Make Experimental Vaccines Unnecessary

This new technology being used in the COVID-19 bioweapon shots is referred to as “The Software of Life,” where frequent upgrades are already being planned to inject into the population. See:

The New mRNA COVID Vaccines Inject an Operating System into Your Body – Not a Conspiracy Theory, Moderna Admits It

And now, we are observing that those who have been injected by the bioweapon shots are somehow infecting those who have not received one of the injections. See:

URGENT! 5 Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to do About It

Not only are the injections considered “bioweapons” by many doctors and scientists, but the original Wuhan Sars-CoV-2 “virus” is also now being called a “bioweapon” by some doctors and scientists, as there is overwhelming evidence that this was created in a laboratory in China with funding from the U.S. NIH and mass-murderer Anthony Fauci.

I have seen this evidence and known about it since the Plandemic started, and many people have asked me why Health Impact News has not covered this story about the origins of COVID-19.

The reason is simple. Whether this was created intentionally in a laboratory, or developed on its own without malicious foreknowledge, is really immaterial to the fact that it is largely not dangerous, and by some doctors’ estimates, even less dangerous than the strains of influenza we are exposed to every year.

So with fear dominating the media for the past year plus, I have focused instead on countering that fear with facts and truth, and the whole story of the origin of Sars-CoV-2 was just not that important, as I was concerned, in the early stages especially, that if we covered it the result would be an increase of fear, which we certainly do not need.

As I have covered the topic of infectious diseases over the past decade plus, most of the “dangerous viruses” and pathogens that the Globalists have tried to use to instill fear into the public have resulted from bioweapons research, usually by the U.S. military.

Ebola is a good example. And while Ebola was deadly in some parts of Africa, the fear that the Globalists tried to instill to the public here in the U.S. never materialized, as it was mostly harmless once it reached the U.S. It didn’t even really stay virulent long enough in Africa to have time to develop a vaccine for it. See this 2014 article:

Liberian Scientist and Professor: Ebola Virus Manufactured by Western Pharmaceuticals, US DoD?

If you are interested in how COVID-19 was developed as a bioweapon, Del Bigtree of the Highwire interviewed world-renown cardiologist and researcher Dr. Richard Fleming last week, and you can watch that interview here in Rumble.

While the COVID-19 “virus” bioweapon turned out to be mostly a dud when it comes to creating mass casualties (more people probably died from COVID-19 because of errors made in the medical system by not promoting home treatments, and then putting people on end-of-life ventilators where the success rate was less than 10%), the COVID-19 bioweapon injections are far more serious, as across the world tens of thousands of deaths have already been recorded following the injections, and the actual number of deaths, most of which are NOT being recorded, could well be in the hundreds of thousands by now, and that is only after 5 months of mass injections.

And now, the criminal organization known as the CDC has recommended that we start injecting children between the ages of 12 and 15, and has even recommended to give this shot with other childhood vaccines – something that obviously has never been tested.

Bernadette Pajer, the ICWA Public Policy Director, has written an excellent piece warning parents of the danger that now faces our nation’s children.

ACIP Puts Our Children At Greater Risk by Allowing Co-administration of C-19 Shots with Other Vaccines

by Bernadette Pajer, ICWA Public Policy Director
InformedChoiceWA.org

On May 12, 2021, the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)voted to recommend the investigational  Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Pfizer shot to children ages 12 to 15.

The ACIP also voted to end restrictions around co-administration with other vaccines even though there has not been a single clinical trial administering any of the shots with any other vaccine. More on this below.

COVID-19 SHOTS DO NOT PREVENT HOSPITALIZATION OR DEATH in ADULTS

Why are young teens being targeted with EUA shots?

This is an age group that does not tend to be susceptible to severe infection, and CDC says from March of 2020 through April 2021, those aged 12-17 made up just 9% of the reported cases, and very few of the hospitalizations. As with adults, children with underlying health issues are more at risk. Most children experience low to no symptoms and likely develop long-lasting robust immunity.

FDA states about the Pfizer’s clinical trial with 12-15 year olds:

An analysis of cases of COVID-19 occurring among participants, 12 through 15 years of age, seven days after the second dose was also conducted. In this analysis, among participants without evidence of prior infection with SARS-CoV-2, no cases of COVID-19 occurred among 1,005 vaccine recipients and 16 cases of COVID-19 occurred among 978 placebo recipients; the vaccine was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19. At this time, there are limited data to address whether the vaccine can prevent transmission of the virus from person to person. In addition, at this time, data are not available to determine how long the vaccine will provide protection.

Just like with adults, the studies were not designed to find out if the shots prevent infection or transmission, only if they prevent mild to moderate symptoms, and it’s unknown how long any personal protection afforded might last.

It’s very clear that the shots don’t prevent infection, serious disease, or fatalities. In an alarming and highly unscientific move, the CDC has decided to stop telling the public the full number of breakthrough cases reported, and only pass on the numbers of fully vaccinated individuals who get COVID-19 anyway and are hospitalized or die.

These numbers are nearly a month old (April 26, 2021) and the most recent being provided.

The CDC admits:

“It is important to note that reported vaccine breakthrough cases will represent an undercount. This surveillance system is passive and relies on voluntary reporting from state health departments which may not be complete.  Also, not all real-world breakthrough cases will be identified because of lack of testing. This is particularly true in instances of asymptomatic or mild illness. These surveillance data are a snapshot and help identify patterns and look for signals among vaccine breakthrough cases.”

Does the CDC not see those numbers as signals of product failure?

INTENTIONAL DECEPTION WITH RRR RATHER THAN ARR

For this most recent EUA, Pfizer’s claim, repeated by the CDC, that the shot is “100%” effective in 12-15 year olds might accurate for the study outcome (although the term “efficacy” is more appropriate), but it’s also very deceptive. 100% is the RRR — the Relative Risk Reduction. That’s how many kids showed “evidence of infection” in the Pfizer shot group verses the saline placebo group, from 7 days post the second shot until the cutoff date (length of time varied per participant, depending on when they got the shot).

But the risk of getting COVID-19 at all was already very small. How much did the shot reduce the risk of getting sick? That’s the ARR–the Absolute Risk Reduction. While the FDA advises ARR to always be reported with RRR so that individual and public policy decisions can be soundly made, ARR is rarely every mentioned.

In this case, between 7 days post the second dose and the cutoff date, the control group had 16 cases out of 978 kids, which is 0.016 of the kids. The shot group had no cases, so 0.00 of the kids. To get ARR you subtract the shot number from the control number and you get 0.016. Expressed as a percent that’s 1.6%.

So the shot–in this short, limited study–reduced the risk of getting COVID by 1.6%.

If we can trust the data. The general public has no idea that all of the studies are conducted by the manufacturers who stand to profit, and they turn in their data to the FDA. It is an honor-system among entities that have a history of criminal fraud.

CO-ADMINISTRATION DANGERS

As unethical as it is to expose children who are not at high risk of severe outcomes to infection to investigational liability-free products that have seen unprecedented level of adverse reactions and deaths reported, when the ACIP opened up the shots to be co-administered with other vaccines, including those with adjuvants, they stepped fully into crimes against humanity.

Not a single clinical trial has been done administering the COVID-19 shots with any other vaccine. There is zero safety data. The Pfizer EUA Fact Sheet states:

Below is the image of a slide captured during the live ACIP Meeting. The last two bullet points were added by the committee after hearing the grave concerns in several public comments.

Watch this video to hear the public comments.

 

 

After the 14-0 vote with one abstention to recommend the Pfizer EUA shot to 12-15 year olds, with no restriction on co-administration with other shots, some ACIP members gave their reason.

They only had one.

They don’t want to miss an opportunity to vaccinate.

That’s it. Science be hanged, safety unknown, by gosh, they didn’t want doctors to miss an opportunity to give other vaccines.

I will repeat. Zero safety studies.

What happens when a 12-year-old is injected with Gardasil with its highly reactogenic aluminum AAHS adjuvant in one arm and the Pfizer mRNA shot in the other?

We have no idea.

What on earth were the members of the ACIP thinking? Why would they make a recommendation based on zero safety science?

FiercePharma, the drug industry’s insider online magazine, provided a likely answer within hours of the ACIP’s vote:

As revenues for several Big Pharma players slumped to start the year, execs blamed part of the problem on the accelerating COVID-19 vaccine rollout. The CDC had recommended people don’t get another shot within two weeks of their COVID-19 vaccine, hitting sales for key products.

Now, the CDC is doing away with that suggestion entirely in an effort to boost routine immunizations among teens. The move could spell financial rewards for leading vaccine companies such as Merck, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer.

During the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meeting on Wednesday, experts endorsed the COVID-19 shot from Pfizer and BioNTech in adolescents aged 12 to 15 and additionally tossed out the agency’s two-week restriction on administering other vaccines.

https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/cdc-throws-out-covid-19-vaccine-coadministation-rule-to-boost-routine-immunizations-but

Over the past few years, vaccine safety reform and medical freedom advocates have attempted to show the public and local public health agencies examples of ACIP votes that have put the public at risk. Nothing has come close to the atrocity of this blatant handing of the American public, and America’s children, to the drug industry.

CALL TO ACTION

We need your help letting parents know that the EUA recommendation to children is based on very limited data, and the co-administration of the EUA shots with other vaccines has zero safety studies. Please share this article everywhere. Send it to your legislators & major media, provide the link in comments to social media posts for the local and national news agencies. Post wherever parents can be found.

Tell the world, and ACIP, our children are not for sale.

May 12, 2021 ACIP Meeting Page: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/slides-2021-05-12.html
Contact ACIP Secretariat

1600 Clifton Road, N.E., Mailstop A27
Atlanta, GA 30329-4027
acip@cdc.gov

Read the full article at InformedChoiceWA.org.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.