Oh what a lovely fiasco! They’re at it again!
Thu 10:15 am +01:00, 10 Dec 2020IT’S OFFICIAL: THE UK GOVERNMENT JUST CAN”T STOP LYING
by Watchdog
In the wake of the pandemic fraud, the mortality stats fraud and the PCR false positives fraud, we now have the Vaccines fraud!
Oh wow! This just gets more and more bizarre!
The team of scamsters that brought you the Fake Pandemic, that also brought you the fraudulent PCR tests that produced tens of thousands of false positives, that went on telly and to the nation’s face lied, and falsified the stats at every turn, that team now brings you the fake ruddy vaccine!
Un-freakin’-believable.
The mealy-mouthed cabal of subversive nation wreckers at Suppression Central make a big song and dance about “following the science” and “taking scientific advice”.
But the guys that invented Thalidomide were also scientists, so were the pharmaceutical industry scientists that gifted the world Agent Orange, Zyklon B gas for the gas chambers, LSD, psych meds with horrific side effects etc etc etc.
Whether “scientific” means good or bad depends on the intentions of the person wielding the science.
But there are also plenty of responsible and creative scientists and technical professionals with a social conscience whom the government chooses to ignore.
And thousands of these are speaking out against the new vaccines the government is falling over itself to get injected into its citizens before anyone can pause for breath long enough to ask “what’s the ruddy catch?”
Well here are some of the catches:
People assume that when the manufacturers talk about a vax being “92% effective” they are talking about its effectiveness in preventing people catching the bug. But that isn’t what they have been tested for and isn’t what they are talking about (they just want you to think they are).
What they are ACTUALLY talking about in the case of the COVID19 vax is “92 or whatever % effective” in reducing some of the symptoms of it and, indeed, apparently some of the milder symptoms.
Suppressing symptoms of an illness is not the same thing as preventing you getting an illness or indeed saving you from dying if you do get it.
Crude analogy: a painkiller reduces one of the symptoms of a broken leg (pain). But it does not treat or heal the broken leg or prevent gangrene or some other infection setting in if it goes untreated.
This isn’t my opinion. This is me relaying to the best of my knowledge the numerous warnings coming from numerous prestigious medical and scientific sources, summed up here by the following quotes from just three of them:
FROM PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC:
“* The vaccines will not cure Covid
* The vaccines will not prevent people from contracting Covid
* The vaccines will not prevent Covid-related hospitalizations
* The vaccines will not prevent Covid-caused deaths.”
ALSO FROM PRINCIPIA SCIENTIFIC:
“[A]ll of this is just public relations hype designed to hoodwink people into injecting themselves with a dubious substance that does NOT do what it’s supposed to do, and which DOES pose serious long-term risks to one’s health.”
FROM THE BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (BMJ)
“Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us”
ALSO FROM THE BMJ (SAME ARTICLE)
“But what will it mean exactly when a vaccine is declared “effective”? To the public this seems fairly obvious. “The primary goal of a covid-19 vaccine is to keep people from getting very sick and dying,”
“. . . Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said, “Ideally, you want an antiviral vaccine to do two things . . . first, reduce the likelihood you will get severely ill and go to the hospital, and two, prevent infection and therefore interrupt disease transmission.”
“Yet the current phase III trials are not actually set up to prove either . . . None of the trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.”
FROM FORBES MAGAZINE:
“One of the more immediate questions a trial needs to answer is whether a vaccine prevents infection. If someone takes this vaccine, are they far less likely to become infected with the virus? These trials all clearly focus on eliminating symptoms of Covid-19, and not infections themselves….
“It appears that all the pharmaceutical companies assume that the vaccine will never prevent infection. Their criteria for approval is the difference in symptoms between an infected control group and an infected vaccine group…
“A greater concern for the millions of older people and those with preexisting conditions is whether these trials test the vaccine’s ability to prevent severe illness and death. Again, we find that severe illness and death are only secondary objectives in these trials. None list the prevention of death and hospitalization as a critically important barrier….
“These protocols do not emphasize the most important ramifications of Covid-19 that people are most interested in preventing: overall infection, hospitalization, and death. It boggles the mind and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, and the rest would consider the approval of a vaccine that would be distributed to hundreds of millions on such slender threads of success.
“It appears that these trials are intended to pass the lowest possible barrier of success.” (“Covid-19 Vaccine Protocols Reveal That Trials Are Designed To Succeed“, Forbes)
