The vaccination campaign: benefit for a few, harm for many |

The vaccination campaign: benefit for a few, harm for many

Sat 12:32 pm +01:00, 7 Nov 2020

posted by Weaver

The federal states were called on by the health minister in the last week of October to prepare the establishment of a total of around 60 vaccination centers throughout Germany. This means that, for the first time, normal vaccination operations are largely relocated from doctors’ practices to facilities that – like PCR tests – are mainly operated by large private laboratories and service providers. It would be – even if made legally possible by emergency ordinances – gross negligence to have the interventions carried out by auxiliary staff who are remote from the patient in mass actions.

WOLFGANG WODARG, November 6, 2020, 0 comments

It’s always the same trick: an illness is magnified under the media magnifying glass and presented as the most terrible danger possible. The media like that. With such an agenda setting, most people notice for the first time that the supposedly dangerous disease actually exists. It used to be different with epidemics.

Corrupt politicians and scientists do the rest. And of course, when the fear is great enough, governments have to react. So far , in the case of “pandemics”, they have only ever financed and bought vaccines and taken on advertising for vaccinations. Now they are even helping to organize the fear of the “epidemic” themselves. There are also enough white coats that always give up for it. Finally, popularity and research grants attract.

The red lights for doctors and patients should come on now at the latest when the Chancellor is trying to enforce immature genetic “mass vaccinations” after the PCR tests that are not approved for diagnoses and are unsuitable. It is planning this under the absurd guise of an epidemiological emergency of national proportions, across the board and bypassing the treating doctors.

Well-known fear makers as pioneers of big business

The common scare tactics of Drosten, Lauterbach, Söder or Merkel lacks any medical-scientific basis. Lauterbach is now running amok again with an embarrassingly bad study , branded “Imperial College”. This panic factory has conjured up the most outrageous fear scenarios out of their computers with the help of the notorious Neil Ferguson with bird and swine flu. Now Covid-19 is supposed to reduce our intellectual performance in the long term. Does the political madness have anything to do with it?

There are more reliable guides – also in the RKI

As for many years, I prefer to stick to the clean epidemiologists of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), who report to us right now, at the end of October 2020, during the test tsunami and before the second lockdown :

“In the National Reference Center (NRZ) for influenza viruses, only rhinoviruses were identified in a total of eleven (39 percent) of the 28 sentinel samples in week 43, 2020. Influenza viruses or SARS-CoV-2 were not identified in any of the sentinel samples examined. Due to the small number of samples sent in, a robust assessment of the viruses that may still be circulating at the moment is not possible. “

Since virus samples are usually taken thousands of times in flu waves from people with respiratory diseases, one wonders: Why are so few regular samples taken now? Isn’t anyone sick anymore?

Vaccination for wrong diagnoses?

The drifting apart of high PCR test numbers with the correspondingly higher false positive test results on the one hand and official documentation of a mild autumn season on the other hand proves, even for medical laypersons, that the PCR test says nothing about clinical findings, infections or infectivity. It is completely unsuitable and misleading as a yardstick for decisions about measures under the Infection Protection Act (IfSG).

“Close your eyes and through” seems the watchword

But politics is currently not caring about evidence-based medicine and the national ethics councils and vaccination commissions apparently no longer ask about the indication of measures, but argue about prioritization, according to the motto: who will benefit from the new “vaccines” first and who unfortunately has to wait. The so-called Covid-19 vaccination can be the most harmful of these measures. It is already financed from our contributions and taxes and is in reality a comprehensive, giant observational study with novel genetic manipulations of our immune systems.

False flag genetic engineering

What around 200 companies and consortia around the world are currently researching and wanting to market as quickly as possible are, to a large extent, new and high-risk genetic engineering interventions in the complex biological communication processes of our immune system. Interventions that should be carried out on healthy people in a previously never attempted extent.

During the swine flu excitement and in the middle of the upcoming federal election campaign in 2009, the vaccine lobby, with the help of its popular representatives, hid the use of recombinant nucleic acids on humans as a “vaccination” in the Drugs Act. That happened in the last meeting before the summer break without any debate and was secretly put on record.

The companies and their political lobby are now trying to gloss over us by saying that it is a normal vaccination. Salvation from the threatening burden of a deadly pandemic would only finally be possible if as many people as possible allowed themselves to be “vaccinated”. Only when a vaccination is there for everyone will the pandemic be ended, announced Ms. von der Leyen at her “donation conference” in chorus with the heads of government from almost all of Europe in spring 2020.

Zero risk and high profits

AstraZeneca, BioNTech / Pfizer, Sanofi / GSK, Merck / Uni Oxford, CureVac, Biologika, CEVEC, ARTES, Vibalogics / Janssen, Moderna / NIAID, Novavax and othersare in the starting blocks and are in the process of completing the funded “telescoped” studies, if possible without scandals and without causing a stir, as part of a “rolling” approval. You can let it roll relatively relaxed, because with the promised indemnities, tax subsidies in the billions and the purchase guarantees for hundreds of thousands of vaccination doses, you have your business practically in your pocket. It was similar with the swine flu. Even the more than 20 million vaccine doses adulterated with active enhancers, which we were spared from swine flu by critical specialists, family doctors and paediatricians, had already been paid for. They could safely be disposed of and still brought Glaxo and competitors carefree returns in the billions worldwide.

SARS-CoV-2: How many new viruses are there?

Allegedly, a Vector “vaccine” from AstraZeneca and an mRNA “vaccine” from BioNTech / Pfizer with their genetic engineering molecules are on the verge of turning millions of people into corona-resistant genetically modified organisms (GMOs). We actually don’t really know which coronaviruses we actually have to fight against, because similar to how we know it from influenza viruses, coronaviruses are also constantly changing many of their gene segments. The original “SARS” coronaviruses from Wuhan have long been undetectable. Hundreds of other Wuhan variants have now been distributed, found and sequenced. And what you can find now mainly are only positive PCR tests, which are known to react with a wide variety of corona variants.

Vaccination centers are to replace the doctor’s offices

In the last week of October the Federal Minister of Health called on the federal states to prepare the establishment of a total of around 60 vaccination centers throughout Germany and to report the delivery addresses for vaccines by November 10, 2020. The health authorities should participate in this. But the retrofitting of congress or concert halls , which are currently closed anyway, is also being considered . This means that, for the first time, normal vaccination operations are largely relocated from doctors’ practices to facilities that – like PCR tests – are mainly operated by large private laboratories and service providers.

As a justification for bypassing the increasingly critical medical profession, technical features of some of the newer procedures are used. The new mRNA “vaccine” must be stored and transported frozen at -20 or below -80 degrees Celsius. If it is prepared for injection, it should not be kept in the refrigerator for more than a few hours. According to information from the industry, this is necessary because in the short development time it is not possible to develop a process that also guarantees stability at normal refrigerator temperatures.

Logistics companies also benefit

The big ones in the logistics industry like DHL, Fedex and UPS are rubbing their hands and are apparently already preparing for a huge deal with cool logistics with a lot of government support. Handelsblatt and Deutsche Welle reported that the companies are building several large cold stores as close as possible to airports, in which there are supposed to be hundreds of large freezers, each of which can hold tens of thousands of vaccine doses. The manufacturers of such refrigerators – for example, the Handelsblatt mentions the Swabian company Binder from Tuttlingen – are among the war profiteers in this war against test results. So there are many for whom this madness also promises good business.

It would be more uncomplicated and cheaper, because alternatively, of course, the use of a conventional updated corona antigen component in the annual influenza vaccination mixture would also be possible. However, it has not yet been shown that this would somehow significantly defuse the annual flu waves. Also, with such a common vaccination campaign, neither big business nor a political “reset” could be staged or justified.

Adé vaccination advice and individual indications

The alleged technical overstrain of some very influential vaccine manufacturers is now intended to ensure that an otherwise always required medical-individual vaccination advice is no longer taken so seriously. I consider the reasoning to be an advanced argument. For decades, sensitive vaccines have been stored centrally and applied decentrally. Some blood products or vaccines have also been delivered to doctors’ practices through cold chains with dry ice and can be used there properly. In the practices, this is mainly a question of scheduling and practice logistics.

Especially with the planned new interventions in the processes of the immune system, anamnestic knowledge and individual medical vaccination advice are more necessary than ever. Because there is a risk of a myriad of individually different complications and side effects. It would be – even if made legally possible by emergency ordinances – gross negligence to have the interventions carried out by auxiliary staff who are remote from the patient in mass actions.

Rolling approval and systematic hiding of side effects

The inevitably higher risk for “vaccinated people” with the “rolling” approvals granted for vaccines is supposed to be compensated for by the fact that the companies have to carry out observational studies, observational studies or post-marketing studies. It is about the vigilant observation of possible adverse effects of drugs, in technical jargon: pharmacovigilance. But what to think of the type of pharmacovigilance now envisaged, we in the health working group at Transparency International examined and denounced years ago. In the case of the genetic changes that are now planned for millions of healthy people in the shortest possible time, such a procedure is more than grossly negligent. If only one person in a thousand vaccinated had a serious side effect,

In the case of mass vaccinations in chicken or pig fattening facilities, the follow-up period lasts for obvious reasons at most until the planned slaughter date, i.e. only weeks to months. The virologists and epidemiologists from veterinary medicine should be called on: People are not cattle for slaughter and want to live long and stay healthy without harmful drug side effects. But in human medicine too, the pharmaceutical industry minimizes its interest in late effects for business reasons. Therefore, there is very little knowledge about such subsequent vaccination effects. Contergan sends his regards.

In the case of genetic modifications, cross-generational effects via the germline cannot categorically be excluded, but should be part of technology impact assessments and pharmacovigilance. In the Health Committee of the Bundestag I vehemently, but in vain, opposed the fact that the monitoring, recording and evaluation of drug side effects are in the hands of the same authorities that approve the drugs for marketing. Unfortunately, this is still the case.

Of course, the pharmaceutical industry would prefer to carry out this monitoring on its own responsibility, as “voluntary self-regulation”. Because of the relaxation of data protection by the current Minister of Health and because of his close cooperation with the data economy and the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry, we are no longer far from such a hostile assumption of public tasks.

The fear of an epidemic as a harvest helper for big data

The big data companies are rubbing their hands anyway, because for them the “pandemic” was just right. After a few favors from the Minister of Health in the previous year – digital vaccination card, electronic patient file, implant register, gematik takeover, etc. – they are now really striking with contact apps, registration of those who have been tested, with reports on contacts, mobility and hygiene discipline. Even symptoms that have occurred should be collected centrally in the future. Since something like this is overwhelming for the state administration, the big data companies are not only happy about state contracts, but also have our most intimate health data on their computers. Data protection is of course guaranteed.

We are slowly becoming a transparent society. Under the pretext of medical research or health monitoring, our health data is now being collected more and more completely from cradle to grave. In the case of Covid-19, allegedly for the prophylactic evaluation and research and improvement of new vaccines.

But what do Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, SAP, Arvato / Bertelsmann and others care about our health? They need our data as the “gold of the future” for their business, because primarily they don’t have to supply us, but their shareholders. While these are legitimate self-interests, it is not legitimate for a lobbyist in the ministerial office to abuse his public office to feed the economy with our health data through hectic data laws and emergency regulations. What’s in it for him? Can you examine that? Corruption and abuse of office were previously open to criminal prosecution in Germany.

No good therapy without a clear diagnosis

The best way to tell whether something is dangerous is by the damage it causes. It is important to recognize this in good time and to observe it precisely, systematically and prospectively. For example, through sentinels like the one operated by the RKI or like a responsible medical officer from Bavaria and others suggest it. More and more often, clinicians in several countries are coming out of cover and asking about the allegedly so many Covid 19 sufferers. Nobody doubts that there will be sick people with respiratory diseases this year too, with new viruses and with severe courses. And that the PCR test can also be positive for these. Only that we have tons of sick people who overcrowd the hospital beds because of a new coronavirus, that’s obviously wrong.

I have just received the following indignant e-mail about the situation in the outpatient clinics of the statutory health insurance physicians: “At first there was not a cent for the tests, and many colleagues – almost all of them in the region – hardly tested at all. Now we get more money for a test – duration: 1 minute – for healthy people (15 euros) than for a complete abdominal sonography for an acute abdomen (15 minutes for 12 euros). That’s why all of a sudden testing is taking place everywhere. ”Here, too, one can see that the viruses are not the problem.

The real plague is institutional corruption

In my previous work as a doctor, as a member of parliament and as a volunteer anti-corruption fighter, I have enough examples with the big players in the agricultural industry, the energy industry, the private armaments and “security” industry, the media world and, of course, especially the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry large-scale scientific fraud, fictitious catastrophes, bought analyzes and fact checkers, secret lobby strategies, psyoping, astroturfing, professional troublemakers, provocateurs or shitstormers. Since the simple bribery of civil servants has given way more and more to the private assumption of entire offices and public institutions, the matter has become very complicated legally. A lot of money is needed both for paid lobbying and agenda setting and for lawyers to defend against it.

Some have a lot of it, and some cannot afford it. What we are now experiencing is the result of this socially desolate imbalance. It doesn’t help if a few billionaires think they can buy (sell) the salvation of the world. Whatever such salvation may look like in the minds of self-proclaimed philanthropists, it can only result in violence and oppression. How many times have we believed that we have overcome these archaic autocratic patterns through human rights, democracy and the rule of law? Unfortunately, there is still no vaccination against corruption.

About the author: Dr. med. Wolfgang Wodarg, born in 1947, is an internist and pulmonologist, specialist in hygiene and environmental medicine as well as in public health and social medicine. After his clinical work as an internist, he was, among other things, medical officer in Schleswig-Holstein for 13 years, at the same time lecturer at universities and technical colleges and chairman of the specialist committee for health environmental protection at the Schleswig-Holstein Medical Association; In 1991 he received a scholarship from Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA (epidemiology).

As a member of the German Bundestag from 1994 to 2009 he was the initiator and spokesman for the Enquête Commission “Ethics and Law of Modern Medicine”, member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, chairman of the health subcommittee and deputy chairman of the committee for culture, education and Science. In 2009 he initiated the committee of inquiry into the role of the WHO in H1N1 (swine flu) in Strasbourg and continued to be involved there as a scientific expert after leaving parliament. He has been working as a freelance university lecturer, doctor and health scientist since 2011 and was a volunteer member of the board and working group leader for health at Transparency International Germany until 2020. Further information can be foundon his website .

More articles on the topic: