Parental Alert .. WHO says your child’s presence in school counts as ‘informed consent’ for vaccination

Notice of non-consent … below

At the end, is a GreenMedInfo document to withdraw consent for all violations to Constitutional Rights, including those occurring during the COVID19 plandemic.

World Health Organization

Thanks to Judy for this alert and Canadian National Report that follows.

The World Health Organization, considered the medical epicenter of the depopulation lobby, now considers your child’s presence in school informed consent to vaccinate the child.

Considerations regarding consent in vaccinating children and adolescents between 6 and 17 years old

vaccination implied consent

Canadian National Report on Immunization, 1996

Volume: 23S4 – May 1997

Unlike some countries, immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution.

Only three provinces have legislation or regulations under their health-protection acts to require proof of immunization for school entrance. Ontario and New Brunswick require proof for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella immunization. In Manitoba, only measles vaccination is covered. It must be emphasized that, in these three provinces, exceptions are permitted for medical or religious grounds and reasons of conscience; legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization.

Requiring proof of immunization for school entrance serves two main purposes. First, parents who have forgotten to have their children properly immunized will be reminded and can rectify the situation. Second, parents who do not wish to have their children immunized must actively refuse and sign documents attesting to that fact.

Also, all provinces and territories have regulations that allow for the exclusion of un-vaccinated children from school during outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Currently, Quebec is the only jurisdiction in Canada to have a compensation plan for VAAEs.

Principles of non-consent

Doing this simple action is powerful! In legal and contractual terms, there’s a mechanism called “implied consent”, or “tacit acceptance.” They mean, once you’ve been notified of (or even learned about) a thing, if you haven’t said NO, you’ve said YES.

Because this is a free-will universe, those that pull the strings in our society want us to be informed of their agenda … to be in fear about it … and to not go further than sharing information, signing petitions (which do not remove our consent), and perhaps demonstrating.

These types of actions are all well and good, but they do not go deep enough, because we can do all of these things and still be in a position of legally / contractually having consented to the situation — or, in contractual terms, to their “offer”.

But when we begin to realize who we truly are, the power we have, and the terrible charade happening in our world that is intended to bind us, we can turn the tables, then create what we want instead. Removing our consent and standing with our unalienable* rights, granted by our Creator (as recognized in the Constitution), is a significant and powerful first step.

* unalienable: that which cannot be separated from you.

Modify the Notice of Non-consent to apply in other situations.

Maxim of Law:
Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32.

COVID19 vaccine: Genetic roulette with a loaded gun

The COVID19 experimental vaccine is a game changer. It includes technology that will alter human DNA with no known consequences, injects technology that could end all privacy, end escape from surveillance 24/7, and end our connection with the divine for those who CONsent.

CTV NEWS COVID19 Poll requires immediate action

Please look at the evidence and speak up.

Reach out to the youth. Share to inform people, and equip them with resources to break the silence if we are to save ourselves. Thank you.

Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Doreen A Agostino
Sent via hardwired computer
All wireless turned off to safeguard life


Posted in ADVOCATEATTNAwakening humansConsciousnessDNAErasureGreat purificationNot demonstrably justifiedYouth | Tagged  | Leave a comment

URGENT: Respond to CTV News COVID19 Poll

It is VITAL to respond to CTV News’ poll – here’s why

The poll asks if there should be a 2nd lock down to slow the rise in COVID19 cases

yes response is CONsent to harder COVID19 measures.

Silence is implied CONsent, which means failure to respond is a yes.
Maxim of Law: Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent.

no response is WITHDRAWAL of CONsent to COVID19 measures NOT DEMONSTRABLY JUSTIFIED evidenced below.

The majority rules.


The CTV News’ poll refers to ‘cases’ not deaths, of which there have been few to none.

Common sense suggests the more tests, the more cases.

The RT-PCR test is unreliable, evidenced below, and to increase the number of false positives a lab can just increase the number of cycles for the test.

“I think if a country said, “You know, we need to end this epidemic,” they could quietly send around a memo saying: “We shouldn’t be having the cut off at 37 [cycles]. If we put it at 32, the number of positive tests drops dramatically. If it’s still not enough, well, you know, 30 or 28 or something like that. So, you can control the sensitivity.” David Crowe

Government abuse aligns with public opinion – Note Well

As long as mainstream media is guiding public opinion, the government can be aggressive and punish people, knowing the majority will go along, and not throw the government out of office.

Example: Australians have the highest degree of accepting vaccines, and their police exhibit the most vicious enforcement of COVID19 measures.

It is vital to inform the Canadian government by responding to this poll.

Purported COVID19

Not one government has proof that corona virus SARS-COV 2 causes COVID19. Is that why elected representatives cannot ask for honesty from government?

Proof requires the gold standard of medical testing called Koch’s Postulates that isolate a suspected disease-causing agent. Freedom of information requests confirmed there is NO record of isolating corona virus SARS-COV 2 anywhere on the planet. Instead, there is an abstract digitally created database virus.

According to Dr. Andrew Kaufman, the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome is a stitched-together construct made of up of all sorts of different sequences, including human DNA sequences.

Unreliable test

The RT-PCR test [Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction] does not test for a virus, it can only test for a sequence of RNA or genetic material. Kary Mullis who invented the PCR test stated it was never intended to detect infectious diseases.

How can any RT-PCR test be meaningful when it tests people against a standard cobbled together in Frankenstein style, and contains DNA sequences themselves (which any person could have as part of their genes)?

Death with or from COVID19?

CBC reported 9,200 people died in Canada WITH COVID19

In a population of 37,971,020 people 9,200 deaths equal .00024% or less than ¼ OF 1% comparable to a regular flu season in Canada.

To state that 9,200 people died WITH COVID-19 can mislead the public. What matters is the number of people who died FROM COVID19.

Death WITH COVID19 ignores preexisting chronic health conditions, and other causes like being hit by a bus. Anyone who tested positive, the cause of death is COVID19, which ignores comorbidity and serious injuries from accidents.

Emergency declaration

To make a Declaration of Emergency in any province or territory in Canada there are certain conditions that must first be met. Not one province met the conditions required to declare an emergency. Note zero deaths in the Yukon!

Not demonstrably justified

No proof SARS-COV 2 causes COVID19, no reliable test, COVID19 deaths comparable to a regular flu season, and unmet conditions to declare an emergency prove COVID19 measures in Canada are NOT DEMONSTRABLY JUSTIFIED.

Silent no more

PLEASE look at the evidence and RESPOND to the poll

Share the evidence, and ask others to respond to the poll because unless the majority of people speak up ‘we’ said YES to

The degree to which individuals withdraw consent and take action determines the fate of all

Please do your part to spread the word. Thank you.

Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Doreen A Agostino

Get the latest Tap posts emailed to you daily