‘NO’ Mask Can Stop Respiratory Disease Very Fine Aerosol Particles – Here’s Proof

World Health Organization statement

Christine Francis, Consultant, Infection Prevention and Control, World Health Organization


This product is an ear loop mask. This product is not a respirator and will not provide any protection from COVID-19 [coronavirus], or other viruses, or contaminants.

Unbiased Medical Literature

Extensive randomized controlled trial [RCT] studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.

No RCT study with verified outcome shows a benefit for health care workers [HCW] or community members in households to wearing a mask or respirator. There is no such study. There are no exceptions.

Likewise, no study exists that shows a benefit from a broad policy to wear masks in public (more in the link below).

Respiratory disease very fine aerosol particles are controlled by atmospheric humidity. They are active in dry winter climate and neutralized by humidity.

The present paper about masks, illustrates the degree to which governments, the mainstream media, and institutional propagandists can decide to operate in a science vacuum, or select only incomplete science that serves their interests. Such recklessness is also certainly the case with the current global lockdown of over 1 billion people, an unprecedented experiment in medical and political history. Read more at https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy

Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test [Polymerase Chain Reaction], argued against PCR as a diagnostic tool, which means using  the PCR test for COVID19 is unreliable. https://healthinsightuk.org/2020/02/12/coronavirus-a-reliable-test-is-badly-needed-we-dont-have-one/

Round Table of over 150 Doctor’s Opinion

02:56 mins Dr. R. Buttar: This entire thing that’s being blamed on COVID19 is actually real pathology from a secondary to a hysto-toxic hypoxic injury, which has nothing to do with the virus. It has to do with contamination from combustion of fossil fuels from the incinerator burn offs, from the chemtrails, from all the different components in the quality of the air. We had that present in Wuhan because we know that the level of air there was extremely, extremely, poor.

We are being groomed

If they can make you wear a mask, make you take the vaccine, then getting you to take the digital Immunity Passport will be a piece of cake, as the old saying goes.

Fines are now being issued for not wearing a mask in Los AngelesFloridaMassachusettsTexasNew Mexico, with other states rapidly coming online. Read more at https://humansarefree.com/2020/07/wear-a-mask-take-the-vaccine-digital-immunity-passport.html

$5000 offered to anyone who can prove they have COVID

No proof that CVOVID19 exists. The gold standard of medical testing to prove disease causation demands that a disease-causing entity, such as a virus, be purified as a first step. This was not done for COVID19, as the authors of a recent paper admitted: ‘“we did not perform tests for detecting the infectious virus in blood”.

Thanks to Judy for this very educational video.

Thousands of people viewed the video yet no one came forward. If no one can prove COVID19 exists how can there be an epidemic?

12 mins Dr. Tim O’Shea does the math around face masks and viruses.

No hard science behind the germ theory of disease.
Germs in the body are scavengers not predators.
All of this relates to COVID19.
Ways to optimize your health.

To save time you can speed up the sound.

Masks don’t protect you, awareness, strong immunity, and a caring attitude do

If you think it’s remotely possible that we have internet to raise awareness and avert extinction patterns of the past, please share this and other posts to save and free ourselves. https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2020/07/right-to-breathe-freely-card-canada-and-usa/
Thank you.

Doreen A Agostino
Without Prejudice and Without Recourse
Sent via hardwired computer
All wireless turned off to safeguard life


Posted in Awakening humansClimate changersConsciousnessGlobalizationGreat purificationInfluenzaSocial engineeringVoters | Tagged  | Leave a comment

Right to Breathe Freely Card: Canada and USA


Thanks to Cindy for the card and Tweet video below.

Card image at https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EcU3rN-XQAMzO-P?format=jpg&name=medium

Please add the following when sharing the card in Ontario.

The Police Services Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.15, Section 1.2, mandates the police to safeguard the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.


Thanks to Alicia for the following, from Anna von Reitz http://www.paulstramer.net/2020/06/freedom-to-breath-card.html

Card image at http://annavonreitz.com/maskexempt.pdf

Face mask expansion card?

Inferior mask and serious hygiene issues

It’s time to become more aware, guard your CONSent with your life, and inform others so they can do the same. Thank you. https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2020/07/no-mask-can-stop-respiratory-disease-very-fine-aerosol-particles-heres-proof/

Doreen A Agostino
Without Prejudice and Without Recourse


2 Responses to “‘NO’ Mask Can Stop Respiratory Disease Very Fine Aerosol Particles – Here’s Proof”

  1. sovereigntea says:

    Clearly the virus has run its course the morbidity stats prove that.

    However #HANG_HANCOCK persists in torturing the public with the nonsense of masks that don’t work.

    This indicates another agenda is in play .. one of Bolshevik demoralization designed to subjugate us and our countrymen.

    Perhaps our military should step in arrest these revolutionaries and arrange a one off date with the dawn chorus.


    March 12: Deputy chief medical officer Dr Jenny Harries: ‘For the average member of the public walking down a street, it is not a good idea… in fact, you can actually trap the virus in the mask and start breathing it in.’

    April 16: Chief medical officer Professor Chris Whitty said: ‘The evidence is weak, but the evidence of a small effect is there under certain circumstances.’

    April 23: Dr Jenny Harries said there could be ‘a very, very small potential beneficial effect in some enclosed environments’.

    April 24: Health Secretary Matt Hancock said: ‘On masks, as more information comes through, the science is constantly evolving and we always bear in mind that science and then take the decision. As of today, the government position is unchanged.’

    April 30: Boris Johnson said: ‘I do think that face coverings will be useful, both for epidemiological reasons, but also for giving people confidence that they can go back to work.’

    June 4: Transport Secretary Grant Shapps announced that face coverings will be mandatory on public transport from June 15. He said: ‘With more people using transport the evidence suggests wearing face coverings offers some – albeit limited – protection against the spread for the virus.’

    June 5: Health Secretary Matt Hancock revealed plans to make face coverings compulsory in hospitals for all staff, visitors and outpatients from June 15, but a furious NHS boss said the decision was made ‘without any notice or consultation’, as other frontline workers slammed the ‘pointless’ announcement

  2. richarda says:

    This from the Royal Society
    “Greenhalgh et al22 and Javid et al23 argue that “absence of evidence” should not be misinterpreted as “evidence of absence”, and in support of face mask usage by the public based on the precautionary principle.”

    I’ve said before that this is the equivalent of a seven year old child on hearing a bump in the night closing their eyes and counting to tem because there might be a boogieman under the bed.

    It is an attempt to move the burden of proof for a negative – that no harm would be caused – onto the protagonist in the full knowedge that negatives cannot be proven.

    I’m well aware that in some circumstances there may be a benefit from wearing a mask. I am also aware that there are adverse medical risks and effects from wearing a mask.

    There is no attempt at balance in the RS paper. To be fair, those refuting mask wearing also fail to provide a balanced assessment. It is therefore left to the individual to do the research and make up their own mind.

    When I hear of mandatory directions that may put the public at risk, I tend to assume that the arguements for wearing a mask have lost their case.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.