Child death rate falls 30% during lockdown. Why?

Infant mortality down; number of vaccinations down
The reference here is an analysis of mortality data by Mark Blaxill and Amy Becker, “Lessons from the Lockdown,” posted at Children’s Health Defense on June 18:

“But the pandemic experience has brought on a surprising effect on this expected death rate among children. Starting in early March, expected deaths began a sharp decline, from an expected level of around 700 deaths per week to well under 500 by mid-April and throughout May.”

“As untimely deaths spiked among the elderly in Manhattan nursing homes and in similar settings all over the country, something mysterious was saving the lives of children. As springtime in America came along with massive disruptions in family life amid near universal lockdowns, roughly 30% fewer children died.”

“Virtually the entire change came from infants. Somehow, the changing pattern of American life during the lockdowns has been saving the lives of hundreds of infants, over 200 per week.”

“One very clear change that has received publicity is that public health officials are bemoaning the sharp decline in infant vaccinations as parents are not taking their infants into pediatric offices for their regular well-baby checks. In the May 15 issue of the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a group of authors from the CDC and Kaiser Permanente reported a sharp decline in provider orders for vaccines as well as a decline in pediatric vaccine doses administered. These declines began in early March, around the time infant deaths began declining.”

Mustn’t report that on the nightly news.  A leak of truth might turn into a river.

The very thought that vaccines are harmful enough to cause death, and withholding them would align with the Hippocratic Oath?

“Say Bob, here’s an interesting item we could run on the broadcast tonight.  Deaths of infants are down during the pandemic, and so are vaccinations.”

“I see.  So you want to end up announcing Frisbee contests during picnics in the park?  And I’ll be producing free YouTube videos featuring cats doing somersaults?  You’re drinking again, right?”

For those who can’t bring themselves to even stick a toe in the waters of the evidence against vaccines, because their cult of science forbids it on pain of death…and who, likewise, salute all public health directives concerning the “pandemic,” like good little boys and girls, here is a backgrounder I call…

To the “educated” potato heads: science is not a political hierarchy

Remember the science bloggers living in mommy’s basement?  Now we have the new COVID version.

“Who’s a Communist?”  “I’m a Communist.”  “Who’s a Communist?”  “I’m a Communist.”  It’s fun.  It’s a new toy to play with.  Capitalism is out.  Old-fashioned.

“Mao killed 60 million of his own people.”  “Who’s Mao?”

So far, I’ve written about 150 articles on the preposterous COVID fakery.  In this piece, I’m going to discuss political hierarchy.

Which is how Tony Fauci got to where he is.  It has nothing to do with knowledge or skill in handling purported “outbreaks.”  And if it weren’t Fauci, it would be someone else.  Another person on television standing next to the president.  Because that is the structure, the pecking order.  There are slots to fill.  And there must be a central mouthpiece.

“Wanted.  Spokesperson to represent The Word.”

Whose word?

Do you really believe that, at the beginning of this whole COVID operation…Fauci is sinking himself deep in collaborative meetings with scientists to come up with a plan?  There is back and forth?  Opinions are challenged?  Data are examined?  Objections are made?  Fauci listens to a representative from Sweden, where the government is taking a different path?  He listens to a pro like Dr. Scott Atlas?  Economic advisors are in the room, making calculations on the devastating effects of a three-month national lockdown?  Fact-checkers, not bullshitters, look into the past track record of that abject failure, Neil Ferguson, who is predicting on his worn-out computer that two million people in America will die—which is the whole rationale for ordering lockdowns?  Someone who is actually intelligent and honest, who works for a US intelligence agency, steps in and questions the event that kicked off all the false hysteria—the Chinese Regime, an overt enemy of the US, locking down 50 million people overnight for no medical reason and sending a fake signal to the WHO and CDC that this is the new model for control?  Do you think any of this happens in a room?

Do you think your college education and what you think you know has the slightest connection to this situation, because you took a biology course and a chemistry course and can find your way around a computer?

Do you have any idea how much counter-information which contradicts your gnome-hero, Fauci, has been piling up in the past three months, and how much of it has been coming from people with all sorts of credentials you would otherwise admire?  Do you?  Do you know how much of this information has been suppressed by the press?  No, you don’t.  You’re a potato head.

The discovery of a new virus has been challenged.  The PCR and antibody tests have been discredited as a legitimate avenue of diagnosis; along with widespread eyeball diagnosis, and coding patients as COVID who really have other unrelated conditions, and counting non-COVID deaths as COVID, this means all the case numbers are meaningless.  The overwhelming number of people dying of the “pandemic” are the elderly, who have years of serious health problems, who have been treated with many toxic drugs, who are then terrified by receiving a false COVID diagnosis, who are isolated from family and friends, and die.  Many old people in these straits are put on ventilators, heavily sedated, and die from the treatment.

But none of this information that challenges the official picture is shoved in the face of public health officials, with a government demand that they respond openly, and in detail.  Why?  Because the political hierarchy is geared to close out dissent.  This has nothing to do with science.

Science involves questions and rebuttals and counter-opinion, and studies that test other options and views.  Science is about confirming or denying official positions through analysis and experiment.  It isn’t about who has wormed his way to the top of the food chain.  It isn’t about who is secretly backing the Mouthpiece.  Aka Bill Gates.

Some potato heads look at things this way: whatever Trump is saying is a lie.  The person who opposes Trump must be right.  That person appears to be Fauci.  Therefore, Fauci is stating SCIENCE.  End of story.

Very few, if any potato heads are aware of the following statement, from a woman who has scrutinized more medical studies than at least 99.9 percent of the doctors on the planet:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” -Marcia Angell, MD (“Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)

Very few, if any potato heads are aware of the review published in the Journal of the American Medical Association on July 26, 2000, by the revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Dr. Barbara Starfield.  Starfield concluded that, every year in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people.  (Review: “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?”

Those are two examples of what we could call counter-science.  They take the mainstream to task.  They deliver blows to official positions.  THIS is what “Fauci-science” should have been subjected to, from the get-go.  And this is what “vaccine science”—the holy of holies—should be subjected to.

Very few, if any, potato heads are aware of the case-number game, through which a locale which is coming out of lockdown and opening up the economy is punished.  It’s simple.  Expand worthless testing.  New case numbers will automatically rise.  The News will report these scary numbers.  Of course, when new case numbers are expanded, the death rate automatically goes down.  So the News omits that fact.

Potato heads tend to admire censorship, never having learned how deep the Bill of Rights actually goes.  Truth should win out over dissent, as far as the potato heads are concerned.  Whose truth?  Theirs, naturally.

Those potato heads who claim to favor socialism (aka Communism) have no idea that the US government is following the lockdown model of a Chinese regime that secured its grip on power, under Mao, by killing 40-65 million of its own people.

Rule: a political hierarchy depends on the support of potato heads.

The federal agencies that stand behind the US “coronavirus task force” ARE a chunk of the political hierarchy.  Their basic agenda is CONTROL.

Potato heads don’t worry about control.  They think they’re above it all and compliant.  An odd mix, but it works for them.  “How can I be at fault if I go along with the directives?”  Hundred of millions of Chinese people ran that question through their minds until it was too late.

“Who’s a potato head?”  “I’m a potato head.”  “Who’s a potato head?”  “I’m a potato head.”

What the major media are giving us these days is wartime messaging; it always comes in the form of an appeal for unity.  But in this case, the war is being fought by the government against the domestic population.

So we’re being asked to work together against ourselves.  Anyone who recognizes this is labeled an outlier.

By the potato heads.

The political hierarchy which they adore, which they call science, has them in the crosshairs, along with everyone else.

This is the hierarchy which we must dismantle and take down and expose.  The leaders, along with their freeloader bureaucracies, are a putrid mix of unknowing and evil fascists.

In America, the National Institutes of Health and the CDC could disappear tomorrow and nothing untoward would happen.  In fact, automatically, improvements would occur.  Subconsciously, the population of the country would breathe a sigh of relief.

“Finally.  Good news.  No potatoes today.”

For many potato heads, the presence of Dr. Fauci making pronouncements to the nation is a no-brainer, in every possible sense of that term.  It’s as if there is a lab where official items are produced: ideas, statements, positions, and even people.  Fauci was one of those items.  A lab made him, he was and is official, and that’s the end of that.

But it isn’t, it’s just the beginning.

The Official is being taken apart.

Use this link to order Jon’s Matrix Collections.
Jon Rappoport

3 Responses to “Child death rate falls 30% during lockdown. Why?”

  1. sovereigntea says:

    The science of murdering old people is based on “social isolation” aka Matt Hancox’s “social distancing” an intentionally harmful form of torture guaranteed to increase morbidity and cause long term damage to mental health.
    In the United Kingdom, people aged 60 or above currently account for approximately 20% of the population [1], and this proportion is expected to rise to 24% by 2030 [2]. In comparison, 11% of the world’s population was aged 60 or above in 2007, rising to an estimated 22% by 2050 [3]. The ageing population has resulted in emphasis being placed on health status trends of older people and how these trends may change in future, due to the anticipated increased demand for health and social care services [4].
    A recent meta-analysis of 148 longitudinal studies (308,849 participants, mean age of 64 years) reported a 50% reduction in the likelihood of mortality for individuals with strong social relationships [20]. A limitation of this review is that ‘strong social relationships’ was a composite variable that combined conceptually distinct measures of an individual’s social context (e.g. loneliness, social isolation etc). Notwithstanding this, the authors observed that the impact of social relationships on the risk of mortality is comparable with major, well-established risk factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption, and exceeds that of physical inactivity and obesity. Studies focusing specifically on the measurement of social isolation and health report similar relationships. For example, social isolation is associated with increased mortality [21], poor self-rated physical health [22] and increased susceptibility to dementia [23] in the general population of older people, and with the onset of disability among older males living alone [24]. In a recent study we found that social isolation was negatively associated with health status and health-related quality of life of older people [25].

    Prior to the COVID eugenics program vast amounts of public resources have been ploughed into combatting the effects of social isolation. Whilst gleefully cutting the pension and care bill Hancox and his co-conspirators have negated these good works costing the people of the UK £millions and wasting the efforts of thousands of people.

    Health and Social Care Archives – The Tavistock Institute › research-themes › health-and-so…
    Connect Hackney represents one of 14 programmes funded by Big Lottery to reduce and prevent social isolation among older people. The Tavistock Institute …

    Social Inclusion / Community Cohesion Archives – The … › research-themes › social-inclusio…
    Digital Exclusion Among At-Risk Groups in Limerick … The National Lottery Community Fund has engaged the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, DMSS … funded by Big Lottery to reduce and prevent social isolation among older people.

    Furthermore the education and psyche of a generation of children has been and will further be damaged as a result of the UK govt social isolation mental torture program.

    California Civil Rights Attorney Leigh Dundas published a video on Facebook this week to show the devastating consequences of isolating children and forcing them to practice “social distancing” at places like school.

    Here are some lesser known facts about social distancing and isolation:

    • It was developed 70 years ago by the CIA to break down enemies of state.

    • It is the equivalent of smoking 15 cigarettes a day AND being an alcoholic.

    • It doubles the risk of death, and destroys the part of the brain responsible for learning.

    Must see video !

    “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

    ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

  2. sovereigntea says:

    Social Distancing = Social Isolation = Intentionally Destroying Social Networks = Eugenics

    Its not like Hancox is not fully aware of the implications of his actions
    A connected society
    A strategy for tackling loneliness – laying the foundations for change

    Caroline Dinenage MP Minister of State for Care
    We know that loneliness can have a serious impact on people’s health – both mentally and physically. The effect of loneliness on health has been compared to that of smoking. It can also have substantial costs for public services, as older people experiencing loneliness are more likely to visit the doctor and have higher use of medication and the emergency services. This is independent of the fact that these individuals develop chronic illness more frequently. We also know carers can be left feeling trapped, lonely and isolated and unable to take part in social activities or relationships, or look after their own health and wellbeing. I am therefore delighted that the Department of Health and Social Care is playing a key part in this work, with health professionals increasingly working with people, communities and other partners to help people stay in good health and avoid loneliness. I am keen to ensure that our society moves towards mental health having parity with physical health and create more carer-friendly communities. But now we need to start talking about our social wellbeing too, with social connections being an important part of that.

    ….The Rt Hon Matt Hancock MP, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

    Government has made great progress in helping people to live longer lives by improvements in public health.

    Tackling loneliness is an important part of this agenda. The problem can strike at any time and without warning to anyone. Addressing loneliness in our society requires everyone to play a part. We all want to live long, healthier, more independent lives – for ourselves and our loved ones. The strategy highlights the practical measures that can be taken to make a difference to health outcomes for those at risk of loneliness. We recognise that there is no off-the-shelf blueprint for tackling loneliness. Loneliness and social isolation cannot be treated with medicines or referral for hospital treatment, so this strategy unveils bold new plans, including increasing access to social prescribing, which enables GPs and other frontline healthcare professionals to refer people to activities in their community. It is not intended to replace the high quality medical care GPs can and do provide, but rather to offer a way to connect, involve and engage people who are socially isolated.

  3. sovereigntea says:

    The United States was actually the world leader in introducing prolonged incarceration, and solitary confinement, as a means of dealing with criminal behavior. The “penitentiary system” began in the United States, first in Philadelphia, in the early nineteenth century, a product of a spirit of great social optimism about the possibility of rehabilitation of individuals with socially deviant behavior.2 The Americans were quite proud of their “penitentiary system” and they invited and encouraged important visitors from abroad to observe them.3 This system, originally labeled as the “Philadelphia System,” involved almost an exclusive reliance upon solitary confinement as a means of incarceration and also became the predominant mode of incarceration, both for post conviction and also for pretrial detainees, in the several European prison systems which emulated the American model.4The results were, in fact, catastrophic. The incidence of mental disturbances among prisoners so detained, and the severity of such disturbances, was so great that the system fell into disfavor and was ultimately abandoned. During this process a major body of clinical literature developed which documented the psychiatric disturbances created by such stringent conditions of confinement.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.