Wi-Fi – the microwaving of the ovarian follicles of schoolgirls

‘…..we can alter the behaviour of cells, tissue…..cause up to six times higher foetus mortality and birth defects….’  wifi researcher.


Barrie Trower

With Deference to all Scientists: this Research Report has been written for all students and non-scientists to understand.

As stated by University Researchers, Government Scientists and International Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7% of schoolgirls exposed to low-level microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are at risk of suffering stillbirth, foetal abnormalities or genetically damaged children, when they give birth. Any genetic damage may pass to successive generations.

Wifi – a Thalidomide in the Making – Who Cares?

Professor John R Goldsmith, International / Advisor Consultant for R.F. Communication, Epidemiology and Communications Sciences Advisor to the World Health Organisation, Military and University Advisor, Researcher; wrote concerning the low level exposure of microwave irradiation (below thermal level) incident upon women:

“Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to the 7th week of pregnancy….”(1)

The level of irradiation incident upon the women was stated, as from, five microwatts per centimetre squared. This level of irradiation may seem meaningless to a non-scientist; however, when I say that it is below what most schoolgirls will receive in a classroom of wi-fi transmitters, from the age of approximately five years upwards, this level becomes more meaningful.

A distinction here must be made and a very important one: schoolgirls are not women. Schoolgirls are children and children are both neurologically and physiologically different from adults. A child’s brain tissue / bone marrow has different electrical conductivity properties than adults due to the higher water content (2) (this renders the Specific Absorption Rate obsolete). Children’s absorption of microwave radiation can be ten times higher than adults. Permanent low-level microwave exposure can induce chronic nitrosative and oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the cellular mitochondria (mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’ can cause irreversible mitochondrial DNA damage (mitochondrial DNA is ten times more susceptible to oxidative and nitrosative ‘stress’ than the DNA in the cell nucleus). Mitochondrial DNA is irreparable due to its low histone protein content, therefore any damage (genetic or otherwise) can be transmitted to all successive generations through the maternal line. (3)

Hence, we are subjecting each successive female generation to harm. Whether these two ten-fold increases ‘merge’ to become 57.7% or are additional, thence equal 67.7% of those to suffer, is a moot point. Either way we are facing the equivalent of a pandemic. I was invited to present a lecture at Brighton University recently and one Doctor commented on a +60% foetal birth rate damage from exposed farm animals. All mammalian species will of course suffer the same consequence resulting from low-level microwave irradiation. There is very little difference ‘biologically’ between our embryonic cells.

I invite the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple explanation concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in schoolgirls.

Imagine you are five years old, in school and sitting with a wi-fi laptop near your abdomen. Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated until you leave school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become pregnant, every one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been microwaved. Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.

Should you become a pregnant as a student, your embryo (for its first 100 days – if it is female) is producing approximately 400,000 follicles (within its ovaries) for future child- birth.

The problem is that these developing follicle cells do not have the cellular protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your ‘Grandchild’ may have had every single follicle cell irradiated and damaged prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes an adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood of its child (your Grand- daughter) suffering the ailments previously mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal development stages.

Beyond Belief

The shocking truth is, not only was all of this known and documented long before wi-fi was ever put in front of children, but the dangerous biological effects were concealed (as they are to this day) from the general public, in order to protect the industries profit.

Professor Goldsmith writes:

“…..effects from exposure to RF radiation in certain populations: reproductive effects…..increased spontaneous abortion…..increased incidence of childhood and other cancers…..” (1)

Confirming this with more than 2000 references is the Naval Medical Research Institute in their document: ‘Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (Effects) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation’ highlight ‘……Altered Menstrual Activity / Altered Foetal Development…..’ (4)

The World Health Organization’s ‘International Symposium’ Research Agreement No. 05- 609-04 ‘Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation’ emphasizes in its 350 pages: Biological effects, health and excess mortality from artificial irradiation of Radio Frequency Microwaves. Section 28 deals with problems concerning Reproductive Function.

This document was classed as ‘Top Secret’ and its contents withheld by WHO and ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). (5)

Eldon Byrd, a scientist for the Naval Surface Weapon Centre of the US Navy, in one of his 1986 lectures on the effects of low-level microwaves, is referenced as stating:

‘…..we can alter the behaviour of cells, tissue…..cause up to six times higher foetus mortality and birth defects….’. (6)

Finally, the Mobile Telecommunications Industry carried out a very thorough and exhaustive scientific study on its own product. This industries conclusion was:

Sec. 7 “…..it can be concluded that electro-magnetic fields with frequencies in the mobile telecommunications range do play a role in the development of cancer.”

“…..Direct damage on the DNA as well as influences on the DNA synthesis and DNA repair mechanisms…..” (7)
(Note I have underscored the relevant words here.)

Note: DNA synthesis is essential for healthy embryonic / foetal / child’s growth.

With these few of the roughly 8000 research articles showing this phenomena; in order to protect this industries’ profit, the United States Defence Intelligence Agency sent a ‘document’ to ‘advanced nations’ describing the problem and suggesting ‘how to deceive the public’.

It read:
“…..if the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be unfavourable effects on industrial output…..exposed to microwave radiation below thermal levels experience more…..” (8)

NB: Industrial output is of course…profit. A very relaxed exposure standard also makes it very difficult to take the industry to court.

This (and two other documents with ref. 8) then continues to list many physiological and neurological dangers from low-level: below thermal, microwave irradiation inc: blood disorders, heart problems, psychiatric symptoms and ‘menstrual disorders’.

*Wi-fi is of course, below thermal low-level microwave irradiation.*

In order to appease the US Government, some Governments adopted the ICNIRP guideline, whereby, the only safety limit is just six-minutes of warming. Which means: if you do not feel too warm in six minutes, wi-fi is deemed to be safe.

No consideration at all has been given to the published ‘below thermal’ cellular interaction as listed by several countries including the United States; which were (and are) known to cause: cancer, severe neuropathological symptoms, foetal defects and literally hundreds of illnesses related to cellular disorders.

Countries following ICNIRP continue to argue that their six minute warming effect is all that is required regarding microwave irradiation.

September 2013

  1. Professor John R. Goldsmith
  2. Microwave News
  3. Andrea Klein & Barrie Trower
  4. NMRI
  5. WHO
  6. Microwave Mind Control
  7. Hennies – Neitzke – Voight
  8. US Defence Intelligence Agency
  9. Barrie Trower
  10. P. Phillips, L.Brown, B.Thornton

Possible Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation Environmental Health Perspectives
Sup. 6 Dec. 1997 P. 1580

Children’s Brains are Different May 3rd. 2010 P.3

Wireless Laptops and Their Transmitters Using Microwaves in Schools P.3 (Undated)

AD750271 Research Report MF12. 524.015-004B 4-10-1971
Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Biological Effects and Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation International Symposium, Warsaw, Poland (1973)
With US Dept of Health, Food and Drug Administration Document 05-609-04

Mind Control and the UK Chapter 4. Tim Rifat P.83 2001

Mobile Telecommunications and Health Review of Current Scientific Research

April 2007 Section 7

DST – 18105-076-76
March 1976
NB: DST-18105-074-76 and ST-CS-01-169-72 also refer to this phenomena

Most Confidential Report on the TETRA (Airwave) Communication System
Strictly for the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS)
June 2009

US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights
CourseNo.11 Page40
Sonoma State University
As a study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons Project Censored: Media Freedom Foundation


page15image237077424 page15image237077696 page15image237078096 page15image237078496page15image237078768 page15image237079168 page15image237079504page15image237079840 page15image237080272 page15image237080480page15image237080752 page15image237081024 page15image237081296


  1. J. Simon C. Arthur
  2. Barrie Trower



  1. C. Avendano, A. Mata, C.A SanchezSarmienta, G. Doncel
  2. Barrie Trower
  3. Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy
  4. Stuart Gallimore, Director of Children’sServices
  5. Paul James

20. 21.

MAPK Aclivation by Radio Waves MRC Protein Phosphoryiation Unit School of Life Sciences
University of Dundee

Published by Journal of Biochemistry (405) e5 e6 2007

www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp- content/uploads/2010/08/Barrie Trower SA.pdf

Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones: Health Effects on Children and Teenagers
Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection
April 2011

Private letters
(available on internet) as titled and dated in text

Use of Laptop Computers Connected to Internet Through Wi-fi Decreases Human Sperm Motility and Increases Sperm Fragmentation Nascentis Medicina Reproductiva, Cordoba, Argentina
Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia (2012)

The Communications Industry is in the Position Where it is Sprialling out of any Person’s Ability to Control it
An Open Letter (undated)

The Biological Effects of Weak Electromagnetic Fields – Problems and Solutions
March 2012 P.14

Personal Letter. Nick Gibb MP
House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA 30 August 2011

Physicist: I’m Stopped From Seeing my MP Mid Devon Advertiser
3.5.13 P. 13

Personal Conversations
I am with holding their private telephone numbers for privacy

Nature Publications – Nature or Scientific American
75, Varick Street, 9th Floor, New York, NY 10013-1917, USA


page16image237384096 page16image237384528 page16image237384864page16image237385200 page16image237385472 page16image237385744page16image237386144 page16image237386480page16image237386752 page16image237387024page16image237387360 page16image237387792 page16image237388000 page16image237388272page16image237388544 page16image237389072


  1. Dimitris J. Panagopoulos,Olle Johansson & George L. Carlo
  2. Dimitris J. PanagopoulosUniversity of Athensn n

Evaluation of Specific Absorption Rate as a Domestic Quantity for Electromagnetic Fields Bioeffects
4.6.2013 Pages – i) 1 ii) 2 iii) 4 iv) 6
PLOS ONE June 2013 Vol 8 Issue 6 e62663

Electromagnetic Interaction Between Environmental Fields and Living Systems Determines Health and Well-Being
Electromagnetic Fields: Principles – Biophysical Effects
ISBN 978-1-62417-063-8

Editors M.H Kwang and S.O Yoon 2013 Nova Sciences Publishers, Inc Pages – i) 20 ii) 35


page17image237486896 page17image237487264page17image237487536 page17image237487872page17image237488144



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.