The Foreign Office, Department for International Development and Ministry of Defence will have their “priorities and objectives” examined and adjusted. Britain’s security services are expected to be included in the review too.
– More money, more cuts –
The headline the Government is pushing is that this could lead to a significant increase in defence spending. The review will not be cost-neutral, like previous defence reviews in 2010 and 2015, and so if a new or missing capability is identified it can be filled without reducing capabilities elsewhere.
That isn’t entirely news, though. The Conservatives had already pledged above-inflation annual increases for the defence budget.
And the review doesn’t mean that there will be a splurge on defence or that there won’t be cuts. The review appears to bear the imprint of Dominic Cummings, who has previously expressed a desire to tackle MoD procurement – the department currently has a multi-billion pound black hole in its procurement budget. Outside experts are to be brought in, while there will be a focus on future warfare rather than traditional combat.
– The Grand Old Duke of York, he didn’t have any men –
One suggestion, reported in The Times, is that the Army could be cut in size even further. At the election, the Conservatives ditched a long-standing pledge not to reduce numbers below the current 82,000, while the Army has been struggling to recruit even to that much-reduced level. Tanks, too, could be set for the chop, with the prospect of traditional state-on-state combat seen to be reducing.
The focus instead, will be on cyberwarfare, space weapons and other state-of-the-art tech.
There will also be an assessment of closer integration with allies. Britain already works closely with France and that relationship could be deepened. Indeed, while the review is intended to add some substance to the idea of “Global Britain”, it may well be about working more closely with allies.
– Review bonanza – A key issue is the timing of the review. It will be completed by the autumn, which is a much shorter timetable than the last major foreign policy and defence review in 1997-98. It will, however, ensure that the review is completed in tandem with a comprehensive spending review across Whitehall.
That, though, raises other concerns. As I’ve written before, the “end of austerity” has been highly selective. There is more money for the NHS and there will soon be more for the MoD. Other departments, though, have been asked to make cuts.
How much Chancellor Rishi Sunak decides to loosen the Government’s fiscal rules will have a major bearing on how the extra cash for defence will be found and who will have to foot the bill.
PS: To celebrate Brexit, Christopher ‘Chopper’ Hope, The Telegraph’s Chief Political Correspondent, is bringing together three pivotal Brexit names: Nigel Farage, Mark Francois MP and Allison Pearson to reflect on how we finally made it out of the EU and discuss what’s next for Britain. Join us on March 10.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.