Corporatism Is Not Capitalism

Ian R. Crane, a man in a caravan, is a self-confessed advocate of capitalism. In this video he refers to social capitalism. These terms frequently have different definitions for different people. Ian has long been open in his views on the anthropological (er, far be it from me to question your terminology, but shouldn’t it be anthropogenic? Hmmm, yes, I believe it should…) climate change scam, yet seems to collaborate with ‘Green’ movement advocates. This is the kind of voice I would welcome to the BBC to reform and improve our national taxpayer funded news and information service. Until then, let’s support and share him best we can.

Bloke In A Field

David Noakes wallows in prison… for manufacturing and distributing a proven cancer remedy.
Chemo, radiation and a 2.3% chance of survival is all that orthodoxy offers….

The Gatwick DRONE … there is way more to this than the Management of Gatwick Airport want you to know!

Meanwhile, please show support for DAVID NOAKES by writing to him at :
PO Box 757,
Heathfield Road,
London, SW18 3HU

1 week on from the Gatwick drone incident and no sign of the drone.
Piers Morgan labelled drone suspects as clowns and terrorists.

Fast Chimp and Clarabel 1970’s military technology identifies and intercepts remote controlled devises
The government even convened a COBRA meeting
Daily Mirror even suggested a UFO

Good for Israeli company Skylock


French buying 51% stake in Gatwick

Greed, greed and more greed….

#DRONEGATE … An Absolute GIFT for the Global CORPORATISTS!



Previous Bloke In A Field:
The Morons At The Sunday Mail

The Morons At The Sunday Mail


3 Responses to “Corporatism Is Not Capitalism”

  1. Tapestry says:


    Business can be anything you want it to be. It can be about making money for shareholders – the corporate formula, which can justify any form of behaviour unless tempered by other values. Or you can run your business with human values as the aim – such as contentment, lack of stress, healthy environment and so on. The government insists that business is all about money and other values are not permitted. Yet humans own and run businesses and should be permitted to identify what values they aspire to fulfilling and serving. It just happens that a content workplace will do much better in practice than a stressed and highly competitive/aggressive one. And it also happens to be true that dying in a distressed state means a lingering sojourn on earth, while dying in contentment can enable our spirits to pass over to peace. There are many spiritual messages passing between the dead and the living with two way traffic. The Satanists fuel their wars and other crimes through ritual and communication with demonic forces. We can all take part in this battle between good and evil if we can correctly identify what is good. Business is no different to anything else. We have to get used to the idea that profit can mean spiritual gain and not just material. The pre-Roman era was full of gnostics who knew all these things. The first thing the Romans did when launching Christianity was massacre all the gnostics and burn all their libraries. We live in the Roman era to this day deprived of all the real knowledge that exists.

  2. NPP says:

    You are absolutely correct:
    I do not know why I have been using anthropological instead of anthropogenic, I think for some time now without realsing, though both probably infer man-made….

    In no ordinary presentation, Dr. Easterbrook (Professor Emeritus of Geology at Western Washington University) bombards the committee with an overwhelming arsenal of data and observations contrary to the theory of anthropogenic global warming. As the Internet jargon goes, this is a “must listen.”

    Capitalism. Agree.
    But, from my simple approach: capital is required to invest in an idea or venture, it seems to me. Very simple and not the evil concept so often inferred.

    • Tapestry says:

      Capital concentrated in too few hands is evil. Capital spread around the population in freely operating hands is good. The term capitalism does not define the use capital is put to. Capital is either concentrated for the few, making everyone else into slaves, or it is made widely available – very different outcomes from capital availability. Both are ‘capitalism’. Capital in short is not an -ism at all. How you use capital is the -ism.

      Corporatism means concentrating wealth into few hands. ‘Humanism’ means allowing ordinary people to access and control capital. Are there any other terms for this, other than humanism? I don’t see any. Private enterprise? Corporatism and private enterprise are two choices within capitalism, both with very different destinations. You can’t have both.

      Capital is the resource which can be used in the two different ways, with humanity ending up slaves on the one hand, or free on the other. Enterprism might be a useful term to have up our sleeves to differentiate two forms of capitalism. Capitalism isn’t a useful term in this debate at all, as it lumps the two outcomes together as one. Corporatism is clear enough in its aims – universal slavery. Enterprism creates universal liberty, and is the missing term, to be used as the alternative to corporatism. Enterprism and corporatism are the two versions of so-called capitalism and they are totally different, being polar opposites. It’s time for free people to drop the term capitalism. It’s a term of the slave owners who want free use of money and capital to be taken away from us. Marxism is simply another form of corporatism. The only version of capitalism they want to be rid of is enterprism, and we don’t even have a word to describe it. That’s how slavery is created – by defining the world through removal of words, so freedom has no language. To fight back first we need a word. Why don’t we use ‘enterprism’? It’s time to park the word capitalism.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.