[fbvideo link=”https://www.facebook.com/susanne.small.77/videos/164243651154416/” width=”500″ height=”400″ onlyvideo=”1″]
Yesterday a sinister turn of events took place in the UK.
A lady called Suzanne Small who had been researching the negative health effects of 5G went to see her doctor to discuss the issue. The doctor didn’t share her concerns. The medical practitioner in fact reported the lady who was then sent into custody under the Mental Health Act. She is currently under detention in a mental health facility in the South of England (Farnham?). So great is the determination of the establishment to roll out 5G in 2020, that anyone trying to reveal the evidence so far collected about its effects such as nausea, stillbirths, increase in cancer and other illnesses can expect the full force of the law, or what they use as the law, when if properly challenged is no such thing.
Justice Morgan who has used City Of London vs Samede as a precedent case to prevent legitimate protests against fracking. No legal representative has dared to put the opposite case that Samede is an inappropriate use of the rules of precedent. No judge is permitted to manufacture new law. A judge can only apply the law, and not apply precedent cases which are not relevant. In the case coming up on October 2nd at the Civil Courts in Fetter Lane, Ian Crane and maybe others are suggesting that Justice Morgan should not be the trial judge. Otherwise this new body of supposed law would be the work of a single man.
Mark Steele is also fighting an injunction whereby he is prevented from talking about what he’s found out in Gateshead. In court soon. Will the judiciary carry on relying on City Of London vs Samede, or will some lawyer of honesty point out to the judges that applying Samede is inappropriate, as the Common Law does take into account environmental effects, and those to health. These cannot be excluded as immaterial circumstances from a judge’s decision. Yet that is what the judiciary across Britain is universally doing at the current time. No discussion is taking place in Parliament. Or the media. Yet the legal basis of the British way of life is being swept away by so far just a couple of judges who feel they can ignore the traditions of centuries of the Common Law and break out on their own, confident that they will win any challenge yet to be made in the Court Of Appeal or the so-called Supreme Court.