Beware The Ides Of March.

In the light of Miles Mathis’ work on the Kennedys and his belief that JFK wasn’t even assassinated but was removed from public life to take part in the running of a covert government (Search JFK  here),  the question would naturally arise – was Julius Caesar actually assassinated, or did he continue controlling events from beyond his apparent grave?

His adopted son Octavianus (aged 45 when Julius aged 55 ‘died’) rose rapidly,  won many battles despite having almost no military experience, became the world’s richest man,  became Rome’s first emperor and was declared to be a God – very rapid promotion you have to admit, and no mean feat given the opposition he faced.  Was he not only ‘trading on his father’s name’ as historians have always claimed, but actually also being advised, funded and directed by him?  The history would make more sense that way.  It wouldn’t be hard to fabricate an assassination amongst a few co-conspirators. Either a complete fake, or you could take out a double easily enough, as was done with Hitler, and possibly JFK.

In the work of Ralph Ellis on Queen Scota of Egypt, he notes that her husband was called Gaythelos.  After passing through various languages on the way there, the name Gaythelos becomes Caesar in Latin.  -OS is just an ending.  GAY becomes CAE.  THEL becomes SAR.  L and R are interchangeable through many language conversions, as are TH and S.

The same family were the emperors of Egypt and Rome, therefore, and following on from there also of Scotland, the centre of World Freemasonry.   Queen Scota left Egypt and after a number of false attempts around the Western Mediterranean, her descendants settled Ireland and Scotland.   Hence the name.  Why else are Freemasonic Halls filled with the emblems of ancient Egypt?  And why else have all the nobility of Europe been crypto-Jewish for centuries (See Miles W. Mathis for more on that topic)?

Would such people be so careless as to permit the assassination of one of their finest and most powerful family members at the pinnacle of his power?  Shakespeare was an intelligence operation, run by the crypto-Jewish Stanleys (Lord Derby).   The Stanleys wrote up the JC assassination into a play, which adds credence to the notion that the assassination never happened.  The crypto-Jews love to run repeats of their finest psy-operations, continuing the deceptions of the past into future minds.

Ellis asserts that the Hyksos of Lower Egypt were the original Jews, the Pharoahs.  The Old Testament kings like David were nothing to do with Judaea or modern day Israel.  They were the Pharoahs.  Their main city was called Avaris, and their central bank ‘The White House’.  If Ellis is right, and he has provided a mass of evidence in his books for over thirty years, the same families have run the world since time began, using false assassination ( as well as real), warfare and the collapse of empires as standard methods of operation .  Egypt and Rome fell, but the Pharoahs never did.

Once you become that rich and powerful, there is no other way to go.  You just move on with the loot, leaving mayhem and chaos behind you.  Ordo Ab Chao.  The money from Rome went to Helvetia, modern day Switzerland.  The US businesses that ran much of the Nazi war machine like AT & T, Ford and IBM channelled their ownership through the same place, and collected their profits likewise.  The top deal was an agreement between IG Farben (The world’s top chemical company) and SONY (Standard Oil New York – the cartel that ran the world’s oil) not to compete with each other, but arrange WW2 to their mutual benefit.  All technology was shared between them under the deal.

The above assumptions show Julius Caesar to be a crypto-Jew.  According to Ralph Ellis, the Royal families of the ancient world were all related across the various Empires.  The world of yesterday is the world of today, and the world of tomorrow.

I wonder who’s next for a fake assassination op?   Choosing March would be far too obvious, of course.  Trump’s ‘hit’ will be more subtly timed, if it is to come.  If a Trump removal is part of the plan, it would be intended to confuse opposition and sidestep anti-war sentiments.  Of course the Russians would be said to be behind it.  It would be part of the plan to once more reduce the world to its knees, in favour of the Pharoahs, who will collect big time, as the US goes into collapse.

JFK was apparently anti-war as was RFK.  Their removal was part of the plan to prosecute the war in Vietnam.  Trump’s removal would allow the war hawks to again move smartly to the fore.

As with Julius Caesar giving way to Augustus,  Trump’s crown will be assumed by the next ‘World’ Emperor (Rome never defeated Persia, although the Royals of Persia were Caesar cousins).  But that might not be an American.  Looking at the quality of Russian armaments, Americans would do very well not to go to war on this occasion.  The money lodged in Switzerland can be swung any which way.  Destroying the old empire, and starting a new one, is about the most profitable way of doing business the Pharaohs have ever discovered.

AUGUSTUS was connected to Julius Caesar on his mother’s side, making a crypto-Jewish/bloodline descent a possibility.  The number eight is always significant signing that this was a Freemasonic op, with Octavius meaning ‘the eighth’, and the eighth month in the calendar being renamed after him.  Maybe Miles Mathis could take a look at this ancient event and compare it to his work on more recent actions.  It could throw some light of upcoming events even.  As Mark Twain (Samuel Clemens whose own career suggests high level connection and knowledge) wrote, ‘History doesn’t repeat itself.  But it rhymes.’


He was born Gaius Octavius Thurinus into an old and wealthy equestrian branch of the plebeian gens Octavia. His maternal great-uncle Julius Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC, and Octavius was named in Caesar’s will as his adopted son and heir, then known as Octavianus (often anglicized to Octavian). He, Mark Antony, and Marcus Lepidus formed the Second Triumvirate to defeat the assassins of Caesar. Following their victory at the Battle of Philippi, the Triumvirate divided the Roman Republic among themselves and ruled as military dictators.[note 3] The Triumvirate was eventually torn apart by the competing ambitions of its members. Lepidus was driven into exile and stripped of his position, and Antony committed suicide following his defeat at the Battle of Actium by Octavian in 31 BC.

After the demise of the Second Triumvirate, Augustus restored the outward façade of the free Republic, with governmental power vested in the Roman Senate, the executive magistrates, and the legislative assemblies. In reality, however, he retained his autocratic power over the Republic as a military dictator. By law, Augustus held a collection of powers granted to him for life by the Senate, including supreme military command, and those of tribune and censor. It took several years for Augustus to develop the framework within which a formally republican state could be led under his sole rule. He rejected monarchical titles, and instead called himself Princeps Civitatis (“First Citizen of the State”). The resulting constitutional framework became known as the Principate, the first phase of the Roman Empire.

The reign of Augustus initiated an era of relative peace known as the Pax Romana. The Roman world was largely free from large-scale conflict for more than two centuries, despite continuous wars of imperial expansion on the Empire’s frontiers and the year-long civil war known as the “Year of the Four Emperors” over the imperial succession. Augustus dramatically enlarged the Empire, annexing Egypt, Dalmatia, Pannonia, Noricum, and Raetia; expanding possessions in Africa; expanding into Germania; and completing the conquest of Hispania. Beyond the frontiers, he secured the Empire with a buffer region of client states (TAP – one of the buffer states was Osrhoene located to the East of Judaea.  In AD 67 the king of Osrhoene launched a revolt in Judaea, which was initially successful but by 70 AD failed due to Jewish infighting and betrayal.  The king of Osrhoene was called Izas, a name you might recognise as faintly familiar!  The primary cities in this tax free, and immensely wealthy country were Palmyra and Edessa.)  and made peace with the Parthian Empire through diplomacy (TAP – Parthian = Persian, an empire equally as large as Rome’s.  Osrhoene was the buffer state guaranteeing peace, but this tiny buffer state was able to become immensely wealthy and powerful in its own right.  Out of the failed war against Rome by King Izas was developed the Christian religion, and Roman Catholicism.).

He reformed the Roman system of taxation, developed networks of roads with an official courier system, established a standing army, established the Praetorian Guard, created official police and fire-fighting servicesfor Rome, and rebuilt much of the city during his reign. Augustus died in AD 14 at the age of 75. He probably died from natural causes, although there were unconfirmed rumors that his wife Livia poisoned him. He was succeeded as Emperor by his adopted son (also stepson and former son-in-law) Tiberius.

The Pentagon’s “Ides of March”: Best Month to Go to War.

Is it a coincidence?

In recent history, from the Vietnam war to the present, the month of March has been chosen by Pentagon and NATO military planners as the “best month” to go to war.

With the exception of the War on Afghanistan (October 2001) and the 1990-91 Gulf War, all major US-NATO and allied led military operations over a period of more than half a century –since the invasion of Vietnam by US ground forces on March 8, 1965– have been initiated in the month of March. (More on the Ides Of March below)

The Ides of March (Idus Martiae) is a day in the Roman calendar which broadly corresponds to March 15.  The Ides of March is also known as the date on which Julius Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC.

(TAP – See more on this below)

Lest we forget, the month of March (in the Roman Calendar) is dedicated to Mars (Martius), the Roman God of War.

For the Romans, the month of March (Martius) marked  “the time to start new military campaigns.”

As in the heyday of the Roman Empire, the US Department of Defense has a mandate to plan and implement a precise “timeline” of military operations.

Does the month of March –identified by the Romans as a “good time” to initiate new military undertakings–, have a bearing on contemporary military doctrine?

Throughout history, seasons including the transition from Winter to Spring have played a strategic role in the timing of military operations.

Do Pentagon military planners favor the month of March?

Do they also –in some mysterious fashion– “idolize” Mars, the Roman God of War?

March 23 (which coincides with the beginning of Spring) was the day “Romans celebrated the start of the military campaign and war fighting season.”

“Homage was paid to Mars the god of war with festivals and feasting. … For the Romans March 23 was a huge celebration known as Tubilustrium”.

Under these festivities which celebrated the Roman god of war,  a large part of the month of March “was dedicated to military celebration and preparedness.”

Timeline of March Military Interventions (1965- 2017)

Recent history confirms that with the exception of Afghanistan (October 2001) and the 1990-91 Gulf War, all major US-NATO led military operations over a period of almost half a century –since the invasion of Vietnam by US ground forces on March 8, 1965– have been initiated in the month of March.

The Vietnam War

The US Congress adopted the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which authorized President Lyndon Johnson to dispatch ground forces to Vietnam on March 8, 1965.

On 8 March 1965, 3,500 U.S. Marines were dispatched to South Vietnam marking the beginning of “America’s ground war”.

NATO’s War on Yugoslavia

NATO’s war on Yugoslavia was launched on March 24, 1999. 

The NATO bombing of Yugoslavia code-named by the US Operation “Noble Anvil”. started on March 24, 1999 and lasted until June 10, 1999.

The Iraq War

The War on Iraq was launched on March 20, 2003. (Baghdad time)

The US-NATO led invasion of Iraq started on 20 March 2003 on the pretext that Iraq possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).

(The 1991 Gulf War on Iraq began on 17th January. However, after the 28th February ceasefire was agreed and signed – following the Basra Road massacre of withdrawing soldiers and fleeing civilians on 26th/27th February – the US 24th Mechanised Infantry Division slaughtered thousands on 2nd March.“)

The Covert War on Syria

The US-NATO Covert War on Syria was initiated on March 15, 2011 with the incursion of Islamist mercenaries and death squads in the southern city of Daraa on the border with Jordan. The terrorists were involved in acts of arson as well as the killings of civilians. This incursion of terrorists was from the very outset supported covertly by the US, NATO and its Persian Gulf allies: Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

NATO’s “Humanitarian” R2P War on Libya

NATO commenced its bombing of Libya on March 19, 2011.  The United Nations Security Council passed an initial resolution on 26 February 2011 (UNSC Resolution 1970), (adopted unanimously).

A subsequent United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 was adopted on 17 March 2011. It authorized the establishment of “a no-fly zone” over Libya, and the use “all necessary measures” “to protect the lives of civilians”.

Libya was bombed relentlessly by NATO warplanes starting on March 19, 2011 for a period of approximately seven months.


On 25 March 2015, an international coalition led by Saudi Arabia and supported by the US launched air strikes against the Huthi armed group in Yemen.


The US and its NATO allies, not to mention Israel, are on a war footing.

Several military scenarios are currently on the drawing board of the Pentagon including Lebanon, North Korea and Iran.

We cannot speculate, however, regarding US-NATO war plans pertaining to the Ides of March 2018.

But for your information here is the latest New York Times (Feb 27) “authoritative” analysis of how North Korea is helping the Syrian government to wage a chemical war against the Syrian people. Nice and not fake, timely (Ides of March) and of course “carefully documented”  by the Newspaper of Record.

Screenshot, NYT, Feb 2, 2018

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, March 01, 2018
Global Research 12 March 2013

Url of this article:

First published on March 13, 2013, updated March 1, 2018.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.