In fact, my papers of the past couple of years have made me suspicious of everyone, including two of my favorite old sites Infowars and NaturalNews. I have been linking to them for years from my links page. What did it there is their coverage of the recent ebola scare, which they pushed at least as hard as the mainstream sources. Since it was clear to me at a glance that the whole ebola thing was faked from the first word, I knew something fishy was going on at these sites. Both sites even admitted in early stories that the scare looked manufactured, but for some reason they buried that line and went gung-ho for the ebola-is-real line.
Both sites did the same thing with Fukushima, selling it with bold scare tactics and very little real research. For this reason I no longer trust these sources. I still link to them because I think both sites still contain some good information, as long as you have the right filter on it. In order to spin information, they have to give you some, and you often get information on both sites you don’t get from the mainstream. For instance, I like Mike Adams’ stance against GMO’s. I do not like his analysis of political events, since it changes year to year. As one examle, Adams has begun purging his site of older articles, like this one on the Boston Marathon and the Craft. Adams originally outed US Intelligence as a probable manufacturer of the Boston Marathon hoax. But now he is cleansing his own site of that information, and labeling that cleanse a “page update”.
Another thing that finally clued me into the true state of Infowars was it republication of mainstream science stories, with no effort to despin them or question them in any way. Alex Jones would appear to be in an “infowar” against mainstream news, except when it is science news. When it is science news, he just reprints it with no comment.
For this reason, I now treat both sites like I treat Veteran’s Today: they are good sources of information, but you have to despin that information with your own filters about half the time. On some topics, these guys appear to be on the right side. They are exposing some things that need to be exposed. But as Gordon Duff at VT has admitted, a fair percentage of the time they are hedging or misdirecting. They may be doing this under threat from above, or for other reasons, but it is happening one way or the other.
Even someone like Paul Watson (at Infowars), who is on the right side of a lot of things, mysteriously comes down on the wrong side of some things, for no apparent reason. As just one example, we saw him claiming that the Sandy Hook conspiracy had been debunked. This after he had spent many segments showing it was a manufactured event. We see these mysterious flip-flops from all the guys at Infowars. Maybe they are bowing to pressure from above, or maybe they are sowing lies and truths together for their own purposes. Whatever the reason, I have to admit I don’t go to Infowars as often as I used to. I do my research from a wide variety of sources and sift it many times.
I said above that I had been republished by Rense and other places, so I want to make sure you understand how that works. I do not submit my papers to anyone, on the internet or off it. Under internet rules, these news compilers can re-publish anything they like, unless they get a take-down notice from the original author. That author has to show some good cause, otherwise the notice is ignored. I do not bother threatening anyone with take-down notices, since I am quite happy to be republished anywhere by anyone. That does not mean I endorse their other content, or like it in any way. In fact, I assume that most of these places are again publishing my work to surround it with noise. I consider a large part of the content at most places to be noise, or worse. But my assumption is that some few people will be able to sift my work out nonetheless, and that is all I can hope for. In fact, that is what I have seen. I get many emails from readers who confirm that.
The spooks assume that enough noise can drown out anything, but I have found by long experience that the truth tends to rise above the din by a music all its own. Somehow the truth just sounds different than a lie. It is in a different key, so that no amount of noise can cover it.
With that still ringing in your ear, I will conclude by giving you a taste of future research. I have been looking briefly into Chemtrails, and it looks to me like the whole “bio-engineering” line is a ruse. There are some bio-engineering tests going on—cloud seeding and the like—but most trails have nothing to do with that. It appears to me that we simply have an increased amount of air-dumping of pollutants that can’t be dumped on the ground. To see what I mean, remember that they have been doing a similar thing with fluoride since the 1940’s. With increased aluminum, fertilizer, and weapons manufacturing, they had a lot fluoride waste that they couldn’t just dump in rivers or in the oceans. Laws were already on the books forbidding it. So someone had the “brilliant” idea of putting it into the drinking water in small amounts. This would effectively dilute it on a nationwide level. The toxicity would be low enough to go unnoticed in most people in the short term, and a profit could even be made by selling it to municipalities as a dentrifice.
Well, they are doing the same thing in the air now. Due to increased manufacturing of all things toxic (think computer industry, for a start), they now have a whole smorgasbord of noxious chemicals that can’t legally be dumped on land or at sea. So someone had the “brilliant” idea of diluting this toxicity by mixing these chemicals into the worldwide air. It would then rain down on the land in such small quantities per square foot we would see little short-term effects. The stirring of the atmosphere would
naturally dissipate the initial release, and the ground would soak up the rest.
Unfortunately, this plan was even more foolhardy than the fluoride plan, for many reasons. One, because they have to use existing plane routes as dump routes, they cannot dump only over uninhabited regions. It is simply not cost effective to hire special dump planes, so they use planes already in the air for other reasons—including commercial jets. Since there are not enough commercial jets on paths over the oceans (international flights) to dump all that needs to be dumped, many dumps are over inhabited areas. The dissipation from winds is not enough to spread the chemicals over a wide enough area, so the concentrations hitting the ground are way too high. The planes would have to be flying many miles higher than they are to do that, and again that is not cost effective. It would delay commercial flights and require an explanation, so it is not done. And finally, the ground does not “soak up” this contamination. It goes immediately into surface and ground water, into crops, gardens, and lawns, and into the oceans. Even in the oceans it is not harmless, since the given flight paths ensure it goes into coastal areas, where it is driven back on beaches. In short, it is a disaster.
This is the cause of many of the problems on the California coast, for instance, not Fukushima. And there are many other cover stories for this contamination, which will come to your mind without much effort.
In fact, this interpretation of chemtrails is confirmed by the first site that come up on a search for “chemical composition of chemtrails.” There we are told,
Laboratory examination of those chemicals found that they were manufacturing wastes from military, industry, and biowarfare substances.
The first two components are Aluminum and Barium. In bio-engineering circles, they tell us Aluminum is used to reflect light back toward the Sun, but that is a cover story. They are counting on you thinking of the reflectivity of Aluminum in sheets, which is admittedly high. But the reflectivity of Aluminum released as dust from an airplane is minimal. In the concentrations given, it wouldn’t even be as reflective as natural clouds. You will tell me they are using the chemicals to seed the clouds, but Aluminum and Barium aren’t used for that. Silver Iodide, Potassium Iodide, and dry ice are. For this reason and many others, my first assumption is that “global warming mitigation” is more misdirection. The dumping isn’t being done to reflect heat away from the Earth, it is being done to get around existing dumping laws, which (mainly) haven’t yet extended to the atmosphere or space.
This isn’t to say that the military isn’t also trying to control and militarize the weather. In fact, they have admitted they are doing that. But in my opinion, in the majority of cases, the chemtrails have nothing to do with that. In the majority of cases, they are just dumping their garbage on your head because it is cost-effective to do so. They prefer you think it has something to do with weather modification, because that at least has some similarity to a scientific excuse. But the truth is even uglier: it is just flat-out pollution. And if it makes you sick, so much the better: these people also own all the pharmaceutical companies, major hospitals, “health-care” plans, and so on. The sicker you are, the richer they are.
In closing, I would like to point you to several other strange things I noticed recently. Since I published my paper exposing the Lincoln assassination as another manufactured event, we have seen a curious uptick in books and cover stories promoting the old stories. Smithsonian magazine recently had a cover story on the assassination, driving home all the old nails. Lincoln is also on the cover of this month’s National Geographic, for no good reason. And Bill O’Reilly was hired to write (or more likely front) a book on the assassination. This book is currently being heavily promoted in all the mainstream bookshops, including airport bookstalls. That is interesting, since O’Reilly has been proved to be a liar in a court of law. Remember how he sued Al Franken for defamation after Franken put his picture on the cover of his book Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them?
Well, he lost. Which means Franken was able to prove in court that O’Reilly was a liar. So who thought it was a good idea to have O’Reilly as the latest salesman of the Lincoln assassination story? Actually, as we have seen, it fits rather well. Since the Lincoln assassination was a big lie, it is appropriate to have a convicted liar writing the newest book on it.