9 Responses to “Kate Green Lab MP Has David İcke Banned”

  1. Tapestry says:

    Before he became a conspiracy theorist, David played football for Hereford
    United, was a reporter for the Leicester Advertiser, and then was an announcer for BBC radio. In 1976,
    he moved to Saudi Arabia, allegedly to “help” with their football team. That’s curious. In 1981 he
    became a news presenter for BBC’s Newsnight, a major news program in the UK. He continued to
    work on BBC Sport until 1990, by which time he was a household name. In 1989 he was one of a
    handful of panelists in the high-profile debate on animal rights at the Royal Institute of Great Britain.
    Other panelists included Germaine Greer, Tom Regan, and Mary Warnock.
    All this success is more indication he was connected, since it is via these connections you succeed—as
    Icke himself later admitted in lectures. He has told us the world is rigged, so before 1990 it appears itwas very rigged in his favor. Despite that, suddenly in 1990 Icke appeared to go off the deep end,
    claiming he was the “Son of the Godhead” and claiming to receive messages from the beyond from
    Wang Ye Lee. That name sounds like another Intel joke. Icke’s wife Atherton changed her name to
    Michaela, which she claimed was an aspect of the Archangel Michael. Rather than put them both in
    straightjackets, Terry Wogan was instructed to invite Icke to come on his program Wogan, a popular
    prime-time talk show. Icke also appeared on BBC radio with Nicky Campbell, and ITV with Fern
    Britton. I have to ask you, does this sound like a logical response to a colleague going starkers? Invite
    him on national media to make an ass of himself? No, this looks like the start of a new project, doesn’t
    it, with this as his bon voyage publicity. Remember, Wogan had him back on a few years later, by
    which time he was already vindicated. Wogan backed down and appeared to be lectured by the
    superior Icke. Very very strange. Ask yourself this: why would Wogan have him on, and why would
    Wogan allow Icke to have the upper hand? These shows are completely staged, and Wogan and his
    people were in control. They could have edited the show any way they liked. So why run promotion
    for Icke? And, of course, they did a similar thing with Alex Jones on Piers Morgan a few years later.
    Piers is a Morgan. Hello, does anyone ever make any connections? Does anyone even look at a last
    name? These people don’t have to hide because their audience is so gullible.
    Within the year, Icke had a book out with a mainstream publisher. Gill and MacMillan published Truth
    Vibrations in 1991. Seeing that Gill and MacMillan mainly publishes educational books for school and
    college students, why would they publish this wild conspiracy theory of a guy claiming to be a “World
    Visionary”? It makes no sense. Although we are told Truth Vibrations was a bestseller, only one copy
    comes up in the US at Ebay on a search.
    Five more books came out in the next three years. This from a guy who couldn’t get through high
    school, dropping out at age 15. And again, all were promoted by mainstream publishers. The first of
    these was Love Changes Everything. But we find the same thing at Ebay, with only two copies
    available worldwide, one in Australia and one in the UK! It was published by Aquarian Press. To
    see some of the other offerings of Aquarian Press through the years, go here. Looks like another MI6
    front to me.
    We are told Icke has a huge audience, but to me it looks manufactured. The lack of books at Ebay
    tends to confirm that. We see huge audiences for his lectures, but those can be bought. Remember,
    Leni Riefenstahl had 30,000 extras for her films back in the 1930s. So just because you see a packed
    auditorium does not mean any real people are paying to get in. Maybe they were paid to sit there. Do
    you really think that many people are going to show up to be lectured to by David Icke? Believe it if
    you must, but I no longer do.
    A couple of readers have compared me to Icke, or asked me about Icke, which is why I am here on this
    page today. I point out that Icke tends to accept mainstream history, simply giving you an alternative
    reading. He accepts that the Protocols are real. Like Dave McGowan, he accepts that Kennedy,
    Lincoln and MLK were assassinated, etc. So he and I have nothing in common. I have proved that
    most of the big events of recent history were staged, so my reading and Icke’s reading have no point of
    In my opinion, Icke is from the families he is pretending to out, and his project is to blackwash
    conspiracy theories in general, by making them look as whacky as possible. This is what all the
    Reptilian shape-changer stuff is about. Like Ezra Pound, Bill Cooper, Eustace Mullins, and hundreds
    of others, Icke is an Anti, sent in to sully-by-association anyone who allies themselves to him, or
    resembles him in any way. They want to be sure that anyone who researches Jewish subjects, inwhatever way, can be tarred and feathered with the same pot as Icke. I think that it is possible that, like
    Pound, Icke may someday soon be instructed to go completely mad, ending up in a mental institution.
    This will finally and abruptly blackwash all his statements about Zionists. But since he has appeared
    half-mad all along, this may not be necessary.
    Notice that another prominent plank of Icke’s theorizing is that our world is a hologram, beamed from
    the Moon or Saturn. Except for the part about Saturn, he shares this theory with mainstream science as
    sold at such places as Scientific American and other top science rags. Neither Icke nor the science
    mags are in good company there. On my science site, I have deconstructed this project thoroughly in
    many papers. It is a conspicuous project of Western Intel, another subset of the old Operation Chaos,
    by which worldwide Intelligence attempts to explain to you the source of your own confusion. It isn’t
    that you are purposely miseducated, taught a lot of contradictory things to keep you disempowered. It
    isn’t that all problems—scientific and non-scientific—are vastly overcomplicated, to keep you from
    progressing. It isn’t that the media is one gigantic lie. It isn’t that you are kept miserable and confused
    so that you will spend more money to compensate. It isn’t that you are kept in a state of managed fear
    and anxiety and panic, to the same end. No, according to them, the problem is that you are a brain in a
    tank, fed information from the Moon in the form of holography. You aren’t being hoaxed by cryptoJewish governors, intent on stealing everything you own while you are in therapy; no, you are being
    hoaxed by aliens or Satanists or reptilians from another dimension.
    Also notice that Icke has nourished a relationship with the far right, while I have simply outed it as
    another hoax. I have no relationship to the far right, and want none. I sell myself as an old-fashioned
    liberal (not neo-liberal), of the pre-Limbaugh definitions. Meaning that I am opposed to both the oldworld-order of top-down control via lying and theft and the new-world-order of top-down control via
    lying and theft. Mainly I am for the truth and for a world not managed on every level by the hoaxing
    governors. I am against all the treasury-sucking schemes of the elite, and believe that public monies
    should go to real and useful projects. I am against raping the world and the majority of its people for

  2. NPP says:

    Oh Miles…. I’m glad you have the real truth for us.
    “I have proved that most of the big events of recent history were staged…”
    Have you? Oh jolly good, one does enjoy a spot of unequivocal proof. I knew some one must have it somewhere.

    Whatever, banning İcke is a frequent and ridiculous reaction by apparently establishment parties. If it’s all a set-up, so be it; the entertainment rolls on.

    I paid to see İcke at Briton c.2008. Bah, and I could have gone for free!? Damn.

  3. Belyi says:

    I have followed David Icke for over 20 years and saw him at Totnes in the mid-1990s. There was the usual group of bigots outside and when we tried to talk to them to see what they objected to, it was evident they had no idea what David talked about – they just had antisemitism on the brain. Most people know that the present occupiers of Israel are not Semitic people anyway.

    Many of the things David mentioned way back have come to pass and I remember how we looked at each other stunned when he mentioned micro-chipped people. We now see that happening. I know that nobody is right all the time, but for me he’s the real deal.

    • NPP says:

      You are correct. He talked about the patched whistle blower when no one considered chipping.

      • Tapestry says:

        Icke offers a lot of good information, but mixed in is the hologram sky, the shape-shifting and other fantastical stuff. He draws in many alternative thinkers, but leads to nowhere. Miles is probably right in that the Icke story is that he came out of mainstream media, and mainstream politics, and he’s designed to make alternative thinkers sound ridiculous. Take what he has but don’t be taken in. Move on to other sources, who don’t claim to be the total story, but have done great work.

  4. NPP says:

    Who is this Miles? Post! Enlighten us! The latest oracle to be taken in by?

    They are all commentators and information to be enraged or not as you feel inclined.

    The point is censorship of thoughts and Icke is persistently censored. Has Miles been banned and censored or merely throwing stones at the Icke glass house?

    Who wants to be led anywhere? This basic stuff; a £3.74billion BBC giving us SFA while Icke gets banned by a Labour MP:

    • Tapestry says:

      Miles Mathis is all over this blog this last two weeks. My responsibility as I’m enjoying reading his work. He commented on Icke as he was being lumped in with Icke as part of the feedback he was receiving. He points out that Icke still says Kennedy and Lincoln were assassinated whereas he demonstrates reasons to believe the assassinations were major hoaxes. Mathis shows that Icke could have crypto-Jewish connections and says the name Icke is originally derived from Hicks, and was changed to hide connections. Vaughan his middle name also denotes connections to the peerage. That’s from memory. Read his whole piece on Icke if you are interested. http://mileswmathis.com/icke.pdf

    • pete fairhurst says:

      If you don’t know who Miles Mathis is NPP then you are seriously behind the curve.

      I call him the rabbit hole maestro. He goes way deep.

      Here is the link to his updates page:

      Scroll down and take your pick. My advice would be to go back a few years and pick an early piece. It has been utterly fascinating to see his theories develop as he uncovers more and more stuff.

      • pete fairhurst says:

        Here is an item from my own blog about the Beat poets. It is based entirely on Miles work with several of his papers from 2013.


        My conclusion:
        “Of course all of these pieces are just informed opinion, with plenty of “connecting the dots”. Well what do you expect? That is realistically the best that you can expect. You’ve just got to use your common sense because nobody in their controlled media, or their on-the-payroll academia, is going to lay any of this out for you definitively.

        If you do read to the end of that lot then, I expect that you will reach the same conclusion that I did.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.