Watch out, America! Statue Of Liberty is next target for terror.

Watch out, America!  Ole predicts next attack Statue Of Liberty

POST – I popped into a neighbour’s house and saw five minutes of TV news.  What a load of …..

Casualties on stretchers with no look of pain.

‘Blood’ on faces of ‘casualties’ looking perfectly fine, still wearing spectacles.  No attempt to wipe it off.

Car on pavement which had been parked at angle inconsistent with narrative.  It had crashed into nothing.  The vehicle had been prepped.

Paramedics strolling around with patient on stretcher not even looking at them.

Then they said there was a police exercise which took place a day or two before, and I walked home as certain as anyone could be that this was yet another false event.

Maybe others have seen more than this as I only watched for a very few minutes.

What did you see?

Here’s some of the baloney provided by the mainstream media –

Witness Quentin Letts said he saw a man in black attack a police officer outside Parliament before being shot two or three times as he tried to storm into the House of Commons.

“I saw a thick-set man in black clothes come through the gates into New Palace Yard, just below Big Ben,” he told the BBC.

“He had something in his hand, it looked like a stick of some sort, and he was challenged by a couple of policemen in yellow jackets.

“And one of the yellow-jacketed policemen fell down and we could see the man in black moving his arm in a way that suggested he was stabbing or striking the yellow-jacketed policeman.”

You would think anyone could tell the difference between a stabbing and a striking action.

When did a knife last look like a stick?

This is baloney.

He quite obviously saw nothing and is waffling, as he has been requested to do, and is no doubt being paid.    If Letts had seen the incident as he claims, he would have no doubt as to what he saw.  He is padding out his reply as he’s lying.

Was the man shot either two or three times?

You’d think he could tell how many shots there were, and remember how many there were.

Come on!  You’d think that in the middle of Central London they could manage more than just one very vague witness!

(Letts pictured laying on more televised nonsense on an earlier occasion).

Let’s have the CCTV footage please to confirm the evidence provided by Quentin Letts, or otherwise.

Oh!  Don’t tell me.  The cameras weren’t working!  I guarantee you will never see any CCTV footage, as this event did not happen.

Thought so..  Interestingly the CCTV cameras for Westminster were reported to have been taken off-line as of September, apparently due to the costs of maintaining them. (

And here he is – the attacker (above) – shot three times (or twice) with no visible blood, and with his left arm still held on the stretcher even though it’s hanging over the edge.

That position requires muscle power and consciousness.

How do people believe all this stuff?  Palpable in-your-face nonsense.

Supposed casualty on Westminster Bridge with requisite handler in attendance, standing up in blue coat.  Quite a comfortable position to lie in.  Why did he move himself down a flight of stairs after supposedly being injured?  You can see the false broken leg as they used in Melbourne recently, the misshapen leg made with padding inside the trousers

Another one is using exactly the same lying on the side in comfort posture so common amongst crisis actors …..-

[fbvideo link=”” width=”500″ height=”400″ onlyvideo=”1″]

Note the woman’s voice repeating over and over ‘Get an ambulance.  Get an ambulance.’  They should recruit better actors.  Really they should.

Another one apparently lying injured in the road and being comforted by a handler (to keep others from approaching – each one has a handler), had time to take off and put his shoes neatly together on the pavement alongside the ‘tragic scene’.


Michael Shrimpton QC, speaking on The Richie Allen Show, says he thinks the attack is real, and is an attempt by German Intelligence, in cooperation with British pro-EU cabinet office (He says the attack was allowed to happen by the Met), to scare Parliament off Article 50!  He habitually blames everything on German Intelligence.  Makes a change from blaming everything on Russia!

I’m not buying that from The Shrimp.

Just look at all the supposed casualties.  Not even one looks half convincing.  Welcome to fake news.

Like this false interview with supposed American ‘tourists’ from the London Eye.  They didn’t know how long they’d been stranded up there.  Around two, two and a half or three hours, they said looking at each other.  You’d know exactly how long you’d been stranded, if you actually had been.  They had mobile phones, as they describe, and a watch.  The rest seems very much like journalists being interviewed posing as tourists.  They gave their names.  Let’s facebook them and see.  Kody and Taylor Davis from Utah.

(No sign of any stranded schoolchildren as the headline claims).

As expected – Facebook shows Kody Davis is a Baseball Star who plays for Utah.  It’s always the same – undeclared journalists or sports stars act as the media witnesses of false terror events.  It’s always the same pattern, over and over again.  See Taylor and Kody on their recent wedding day.  The point being that sports stars are trained in media handling same as journalists.  They are used to provide credibility to false events as they have the required skills, and don’t go weak at the knees at the sight of a camera and an interviewer and utter gibberish, as most ordinary members of the public do tend to do.  Nice work, Kody.  Professional job.  You’re put in place to deceive millions of people across the globe.  Are you proud?  Or is the money just too good to refuse?

Ole Dammegard says the perpetrators of the worldwide ‘attacks’ leave clues at the last event to indicate which event will happen next.  In Melbourne the TV coverage focused in on a tower identical to Big Ben, which he identified as a possible clue, filmed before the car started doing doughnuts in an empty city centre street.  He warned of an ‘attack’ on Westminster during March as a result and he’s now been proved correct.  His website is

All politicians act as if this is real.  No one died.  It’s all false.  Nigel Farage on LBC says ‘I wouldn’t look at this if I were you’.  Surely he knows it all part of the worldwide false terror campaign.  The Met Police Special Operations Commissioner Mark Rowley promises more Police on the streets and later on military presence if necessary.  Many streets are closed.  Some stations.  All baloney.  Just get used to the coming Police State.

Note that the deceased police officer was formerly a soldier.  He could have died in combat unreported.  Special forces deaths go unreported in the media, and the government can decide when it is convenient to announce their deaths at a later date.  All Police on street patrol wear knife proof vests.  The stabbing as reported could not have happened.

London Ambulance tweet is also odd.  How come they claimed they treated 10 patients on Westminster Bridge by 9.52 am, when they were only meant to have been called out much later in the day.  Click to enlarge.  There’s a stack of evidence this was all false, yet most people have been completely taken in by the silver screen that sits in their front room.






14 Responses to “Watch out, America! Statue Of Liberty is next target for terror.”

  1. NPP says:

    “… a police exercise taking place the same day…”
    Really, you heard that?

    It postponed the Scotish independence vote. Theresa gets to sit down with Cobra. The BBC are lapping up and pushing out every second.

  2. sovereigntea says:

    Mark Rowley is the British assistant commissioner who has been providing updates about the terrorist attack in London.

    Rowley said in a press conference on Wednesday afternoon that four people have been killed in the attack and at least 20 people have been injured.

    Here’s what you need to know about Mark Rowley, the British police commissioner who has been handling the investigation into the attack in London.

    RUSI !
    3. He Says That Many Social Media Firms Make Investigating Terrorism Difficult

    He said that the uncooperative nature of social media companies is the “growing Achilles’ heel” of counter-terrorism, adding that many of these companies are creating “safe havens” for terrorists and criminals.

  3. sovereigntea says:

    joining the dots

    internally it has always been the jo b of the modern state to maintain the status quo and law and order, and in times of crisis (perceived or real), to coordinate all the agencies of the state at the national level. In the UK a National Security Pl an was adopted in the early 1970s (incorporating military, political, legal, sociol ogical, psychological and ideological factors) and covered internal security and “civil defence” (now civil contingency pla nning) and was in effect: “a defence against civilians; it pr otects the government against its people.”[2] The current UK National Security Strategy was adopted in March 2008. One of the architects was Sir Da vid Ormand, who had been the UK Security and Intelligence Coordina tor in the Cabinet Office (and previously been Director of Government Communications Headquarters, GCHQ, the UK equiva lent of the US’s NSA). In a publication for the Institue for Publ ic Policy Research (IPPR) Ormand says that the implications of the Strategy for the intelligence community include the adoption of anticipatory policies towards future threats.[3]

    In the article Ormand says that mo dern national security needs three types of intelligence: traditional se cret sources, open sources and an entirely new one: “personal protected data”.

    Traditional secret sources: the “heart” of secret intelligence is human sources (HUMINT, undercover agents and paid/unpaid pa rticipants) and the interception of co mmunications. These are backed by SIGINT (Signals intelligence), IMINT (photo-reconnaissance), ELINT (electronic intelligence) and MASINT(measureme nt and signature intelligence). However, these secret sources are increasingly ”dwarfed” by OSINT(Open source intelligence) trawled from the internet. The new third category is PROT INT(“protected information”).
    This is personal information ab
    out individuals that resides in
    databases, such as advance passen
    ger information, airline bookings
    and other travel data, passport an
    d biometric data, immigration,
    identity and border records,
    criminal records, and other
    governmental and private sector data, including financial and
    telephone and other communications records. Such information may
    be held in national records, covere
    d by Data Protection legislation,
    but it might also be held offshore
    by other nations or by global
    companies, and may or may not be subject to international
    Ormand argues that PROTINT and th
    e ability to use “data-mining and
    pattern recognition software” may be
    vital to pre-empt terrorism.
    However, the history of MI5, the inte
    rnal security agency (and Special
    Branch) shows that capabilities de
    veloped to tackle terrorism are
    quickly extended to all areas of law and order.

    • sovereigntea says:

      lo & behold

      Thursday 23 March 2017 12:01am
      Treasury Committee chair Andrew Tyrie calls for one-stop watchdog to fight cyber crime, warning current system is too “opaque”
      The chair of the Treasury Select Committee is today calling on the government to setup a one-stop watchdog to tackle financial cyber crime.

      Andrew Tyrie has written to chancellor Philip Hammond, warning the current lines of accountability for cyber security for the sector are too “opaque”.

    • sovereigntea says:

      Lessons from history for UK Home Sec Theresa May’s Investigatory Powers Bill
      Been there, read the law, got bulk-intercepted

      Investigatory Powers Bill 2016

      Before the 2015 general election had been even declared, it was confirmed Theresa May would retain her cabinet position as Home Secretary. She also said she planned to reintroduce the provisions of the Communications Data Bill provisions the Liberal Democrats had successfully blocked. A first draft was published on 4 November 2015

      Three Parliamentary committees recommended more than 120 amendments but the Investigatory Powers Bill 2016 (PDF) that came in on March 1 saw few amendments made – and those seemingly only to address drafting issues witnesses had complained about.

      The Bill is slated to bring most of the intelligence agencies’ snooping powers under parliamentary rule for the first time.

      However, while the security agencies had almost certainly always had access to Britons’ web-browsing histories through instances of the royal prerogative, that power would now be extended to the police through the inclusion of ICRs. Other provisions include bulk hacking powers and the ability to coerce companies into facilitating the State’s snooping.

  4. SophieW says:

    So now we are being told “if our phones have tobbe tapped by the spooks…so be it! We must back intelligence services in the fight against terror,”
    Thoughts on that?

  5. RabbiT says:


    “A woman jumps into the Thames”

    or should that be:

    “…after the car had passed her a woman bungee jumped her way into the Thames thus allowing her to enter the river safely?”

    That’s how the footage looks to me:

  6. Tom74 says:

    If it wasn’t staged then it doesn’t say much for the security forces if they can’t even guard the Houses of Parliament. But don’t hold your breath for any resignations.
    Old Hatchet Face is already making the most of it for her CIA bosses, of course.

  7. Aldous says:

    Farage will be doing what’s expected of him – or else i.e. ALL mainstream politicians singing from the same NWO hymn sheet.

    He may have preferred to make “No comment” but wasn’t given much of a choice. Never forget that these Deep State bastards he has to watch over his back for kill babies in the womb just for fun.

    Its (London) all a terrific hoax of course and quite enjoyable to watch if one is a masochist. I particularly enjoyed the apparent ‘bungy jump’ into the Thames by (no doubt) a crisis actor and the usual foreign fatalities and casualties narrative. The 24/7 msm ready and waiting with their usual claptrap ready and prepared by the usual suspects.

    I have to confess to being a bit confused here though, regarding Zionist Gun Control and think Lenin’s quote needs further investigation:

    “One man with a car can mow down 100 without one. … Make mass searches and hold executions for found cars.”

    Looks like we may all be walking again. A bitch but far more healthy.

  8. Aldous says:

    False Flag Terror Attack Outside of Parliament “Staged” to Distract from the GCHQ Wiretap Scandal

    Also Designed to Neutralize Resistance to Brexit Trigger

    “There’s no question that those terrorist attacks right next to the seat of British power were conducted to quickly change
    the growing national conversation regarding the GCHQ’s Trump affair.”

    — Veteran Intelligence Analyst

    By all insider accounts, the GCHQ scandal was blown up by President Donald Trump for very good reasons.

    In fact, the only realistic way for Trump to fulfill his campaign promise to “drain the swamp” — inside the Beltway — is to expose the shadow government that has run the United States of America for many decades.

  9. drbhelthi says:

    My suspicion is that the Statue of Liberty will be a target if Mrs. LePen is elected to the presidency of France.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.