Former Wall St. Banker Suggests Global Debt May Not be Owned by Humans



September 21, 2016 by Lucas Dare, Staff Writer
Waking Times


Is the world economy a closed system or an open system? In other words, are the world’s financial elite conducting transactions with off-planet entities, enslaving the human race to unseen actors?

The world’s people are held in perpetual bondage to the fiat currency money masters who have saddled us with absolutely insurmountable debt obligations which are mathematically impossible to repay. At present, the CIA estimates the total global debt to be nearing $90 trillion.

“In 2013, according to the CIA’s World Factbook, the GWP totalled approximately US $87.25 trillion in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP), and around US $74.31 trillion in nominal terms.” [Source]

The gross world product, the nominal value of planetary human endeavor per year, was recently estimated at $78 trillion, meaning nearly an entire year of the productivity of every man, woman and child on planet earth, some 7.4 billion people, is owed to someone, but who exactly no one really knows for sure. How is this possible?

As nations like Greece are forced into austerity and unnecessary hardship by private banks, it is becoming ever more clear to the people of the world that debt-based currency is being used to conquer nations and enslave free people. The fiat money scheme is so absurd, so detrimental to human progress, that any sane person has to wonder why the global debt cannot just be written off with a few key strokes, allowing the world’s economy to again thrive.

In fact it can be written off, as was implied by former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan.

“The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. So there is zero probability of default.” ~Alan Greenspan

In other words, the money, ie., the debt, is meaningless, only having value if governments around the world use law and the violence of authority to enforce their citizens into payment of these fraudulent obligations, which is indeed happening the world over.

“I thought about the core tools we EHMs (economic hit men) used in my day: false economics that included distorted financial analyses, inflated projections, and rigged accounting books; secrecy, deception, threats, bribes, and extortion; false promises that we never intended to honor; and enslavement through debt and fear. These same tools are used today.” ~John Perkins, The New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

After years of investigative research into the trillions of dollars missing from the U.S. government, former Wall Street banker and former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in the first Bush Administration, Catherine Austin Fitts has come to the conclusion that global debt may very well be owned by off-planet entities who operate planet earth as a real estate investment.

“Is earth an open or closed economy? I went to business school, I worked on Wall Street for eleven years, you know I’ve been involved in the economy my whole life and the whole time I was invited to assume that earth was a closed economy. So, if we issued debt, then other humans owned that debt. If we issued stock, other humans owned that stock. But if you look at all the economic experiences I’ve had over my whole life, in government, businesses, everything else, what I will tell you is, you know, if you ask me to describe the economic model on planet earth, I would say, ‘well planet earth is a real estate investment trust because we’re paying a dividend some place every year, and I don’t know where it’s going. It’s going into that question mark, on the planetary balance sheet.” [Source]

While she admits that she herself does not have the answer to this rather serious question, the fact that each year a major portion of the world’s productivity evaporates into thin air, with no accountability whatsoever, does indeed beg this question to be asked by any serious economist. Even the government accounting agencies responsible for tracking and recording our expenditures can do nothing to answer the question. The money simply vanishes, the debt grows exponentially, and no one can explain who exactly the beneficiary is.

“Let me bring it down to some of the important questions you have to ask if you ask the question, ‘is this an open or closed economy.’ I got great statistics on who would issue debt, but for the life of me I couldn’t get great statistics on who owned it. I don’t know who owns it. I know they control. And they control through the debt because that’s how you control a company in invisible ways, by controlling through the debt. Who owns the debt? Is it humans, or is it somebody else?” ~Catherine Austin Fitts

We have a decent idea of who controls the world’s debt (the central banks, the IMF, and the private banking families), and we assume that these entities own this debt, but the cost to humanity is so great that something simply does not add up, unless the picture is broadened to include the possibility that earthlings are paying rent to other, as of yet undisclosed actors.

“Some people say that gold is the currency that will allow us to trade across planets, but for the life of me, I’ve spent many years trying to figure out what the gold inventory is on this planet, and I can’t do it. In 2011, somebody jammed the price of gold down, and then moved an unbelievable amount of inventory out of the single largest inventory in the overt economy for the GLD ETF.” ~Catherine Austin Fitts

It’s almost as if someone bought the moon, she points out, yet there is absolutely no agency on our planet that can explain astronomically huge transactions like these nor bring accountability to the billions of people who are being subjugated by a slavish debt-currency system.

So who owns our debt? It is a practical and key question, given the impact the carrying of such tremendous amounts of debt has on the human condition, and how easy it could be to free ourselves and future generations from such unreasonable, criminal bondage by simply adjusting a few digits on a computer screen. The fact that this option is not on the table in any discussion at any level is itself telling.



$6.5 trillion missing from Defense Department

‘Fact the Pentagon can’t account for how it spent money reveals a potentially far greater problem than theft’

Published: 08/17/2016 by Bob Unruh

A relatively obscure audit report from the Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Defense suddenly is getting a lot of attention for what it apparently reveals: The Pentagon can’t account for $6.5 trillion.

At ArmstrongEconomics, the blog reported, “Once again, the office of inspector general has come up with a huge hole in the Department of Defense with a missing $6.5 trillion.”

The day before 9/11, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld admitted $2.3 trillion was missing from the Defense Department budget, noted the blog.

That figure has now grown to $6.5 trillion and counting.

To get a handle on its magnitude, a pile of $100 bills in that amount would be enough to make every man, woman and child in the states of Colorado, Wyoming and South Dakota an instant millionaire.

Read more:




9 Responses to “Former Wall St. Banker Suggests Global Debt May Not be Owned by Humans”

  1. Aldous says:

    Comments aren’t getting through.

  2. Aldous says:

    Simple Simon met a Pie-man going to the fair; said Simple Simon to the Pie-man: “Give me all your pies or I smash your face in.”

    Will this get through?

  3. Aldous says:

    Tap/Gordon, this site is being hacked. I can submit inert comments like the above but anything constructive is being blocked. Just saying.

  4. Tapestry says:

    Thanks for the heads up Aldous. Can you email comments?

    • Aldous says:

      Hi Tap and thanks for that suggestion. I’ll keep plugging away as normal but will avoid emails for the time being as I might end up like Hillary ‘seizuring(sic) my head off’ during heated discussions about splitting the atom and such-like at my local bar where everyone knows one’s name and you/they wish they/you didn’t. Regards 🙂

  5. Nollidge says:

    This is correct – as long as you understand that a certain demographic (shalom to you all),has never behaved in a way that we goyim have regarded as human.

  6. Aldous says:

    “Former Wall St. Banker Suggests Global Debt May Not be Owned by Humans”

    No need to think too far outside of the box (or planet) on this one Gordon. The so-called ‘debt’ is owned(sic) by a plethora of Fictional Identities unwittingly created at Birth/Berth by one’s parents.
    Just tell the bankers(sic) to ‘get lost’ and shove their fictitious debt where the Sun don’t shine.
    They’re criminals. pedophiles, deviants and perverts anyway, deserving of a prolonged and public-like Hillary-type slow death with a colostomy bag, poorly hidden by a Hoover bag lookalike designer (not) overcoat that was definitely not fashioned by Versace.

  7. Aldous says:

    A ship is delivered through the water by the dock to it’s place of berth.

    You are delivered through your mothers water, birth canal, by the doc.

    All ships are female because they carry cargo, like your mother carried you, they all carry something of commercial value.

    You are a Maritime Admiralty Product, and you have entered the economy of this country, what is your worth? Nobody knows, so your corporations account is credited with an amount of 1.000.000$. You, representing your company, are now, among other things, bound by contract to pay off the debt of your holding company, the government. Along with all your fellow sister companies. As to not discriminate I suppose.

    So when you receive mail with your name in all capital letters know that it is not you they are addressing, it is your corporation. You don’t have to go to court. Your corporation goes to court. A court is something you play a game on. The judge rules from the bench, which comes from Latin, meaning ‘bank’, and somebody has to pay. But you don’t have any control over your corporation, you don’t even know about it, so it’s not really fair, is it?

  8. Aldous says:

    Hi again Tap/Gordon. The offending text is what was between those two comments submitted at 4:45 pm and 4:49 pm. There are no expletives in it and as far as I can see, it’s a short copy/paste. I’ll keep working on it and let you know.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.