Election Justice USA Study Finds that Without Election Fraud Sanders Would Have Won by Landslide

July 29, 2016 by Joynter

Election Justice USA finds that Bernie Sanders lost an estimated 184 delegates to Election Fraud:

Well, 184 is only the upper estimate considering election fraud. Not even counting in the immense MSM bias, lack of debates, DNC bias/shenenigans outside of fraud, Hillary’s huge funding thanks to corruption… It should have been a landslide for Bernie!

The following is from the last page of the entire report:


We have aimed to provide an overview of the evidence for various types of fraud and targeted voter suppression impacting the outcomes of the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. After covering the legal background and the history of Election Justice USA’s legal actions, our best efforts to combat election fraud and voter suppression, we gave a thorough treatment of:

1) Targeted voter suppression

2) Registration tampering

3) Illegal voter purges

4) Exit polling discrepancies

5) Evidence for voting machine tampering

6) The security (or lack thereof) of various voting machine types

Finally, we gave a date-by-date, state-by-state overview of each of these fraud or suppression types at work throughout the course of the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. Based on this work, Election Justice USA has established an upper estimate of 184 pledged delegates lost by Senator Bernie Sanders as a consequence of specific irregularities and instances of fraud. Adding these delegates to Senator Sanders’ pledged delegate total and subtracting the same number from Hillary Clinton’s total would more than erase the 359 pledged delegate gap between the two candidates. EJUSA established the upper estimate through exit polling data, statistical analysis by precinct size, and attention to the details of Democratic proportional awarding of national delegates. Even small changes in vote shares in critical states like Massachusetts and New York could have substantially changed the media narrative surrounding the primaries in ways that would likely have had far reaching consequences for Senator Sanders’ campaign.


We conclude by calling for decertification of the 2016 Democratic primary results in every state in which we have established a reasonable doubt as to the accuracy of the vote tally.


So, at the end of the day, Ralph Nader was right: She did win by dictatorship.

Source: http://m.dailykos.com/story/2016/7/29/1554022/-Election-Justice-USA-Study-Finds-that-Without-Election-Fraud-Sanders-Would-Have-Won-by-Landslide


“Election Fraud Underway” – NBC Affiliate Posts “Election Results” For Florida Race That Hasn’t Happened Yet

Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-29/election-fraud-underway-nbc-affiliate-posts-election-results-florida-race-hasnt-happ


3 Responses to “Election Justice USA Study Finds that Without Election Fraud Sanders Would Have Won by Landslide”

  1. Nollidge says:

    Daily cos is run by a VERY dodgy character,Marcos Moulatis. His family were part of El Salvador’s ruling elite,&, so the story goes, were so heavily involved in Iran Contra,& the mass murder of indigenous peoples,that a change of circumstance forced them to emigrate to the U.S.,or suffer vengeance.
    Moulatis works for the C.I.A. (He claims he left but you never leave the C.I.A.,except in a box or to carry out an apparently unrelated assignment.)
    The “Progressive” (the new term for Communist) site “Kos”is obviously it.
    His site is now totally in the tank for Hillary.

    • Men Scryfa says:

      “I heard about this at the Open Minds conference in Amsterdam. It was great to meet Max Igan, Zen Gerdiner and Ole Dammegard. Max was seething with rage and anxiety over this project, and swore everyone to silence after telling us – NB don’t ever tell me a secret, I don’t like keeping them!”

      Thanks Nick for the info about Ken O’Keefe but honestly Nick someone needs to tell you what a TurdBag Zen is.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.