Why do governments laying on terror events use crisis actors and not real eyewitnesses? Was Jo Cox even killed?

Brasscheck was the first news outlet to
draw attention to the bizarre “eye witnesses”
the news media has been trotting out
since 9/11.

(See “The 9/11 Solution” which has been mirrored
across the Internet and viewed at least 8 million
times.)

The unanswered question: Why do they use
crisis actors instead of real eye witnesses?

This video offers an intriguing suggestion
about the motivation.

Video:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/29779.html

Whether the murder was real or not, the patsy seems to be ideally selected.

Someone’s been preparing the patsy for the Jo Cox assassination

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Responses to “Why do governments laying on terror events use crisis actors and not real eyewitnesses? Was Jo Cox even killed?”

  1. Samadhi Maithuna says:

    Could it be….a buillt in aspect, not the only one. But since 2001 , could it be a more gradual in built plan. Purposefully making these events have flaws in that eventually the masses start waking up to.?

    Why do they rely on crisis actors rather than real witnesses?

    And why, for what reason. Coukd the 33rd degree freemasons have for wanting this Revelation of the Method?

    We could ask the same question about the alive and well 1986 challenger astronauts teaching at Yale and Wisconsin universities today, no attempt even to change names. Why?

    These psyops obviously have built in weaknesses they want the public to see the obvious deception. Even though in short term the Method isnt meant to be revealed.

    But why?

  2. Tom74 says:

    There is no evidence that she wasn’t killed. Nevertheless, I find the family’s behaviour odd. People do react differently to grief but it seems unusual that they should have wanted to appear in public the day after the sudden and violent death of a loved one.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.