Chemtrails belief is a danger to children – judge.

A judge in Colorado ordered a mother’s child to be removed from her custody because the mother’s interest in “chemtrails” was a “fringe subculture” and represented a threat to her daughter.
Boulder Judge Dolores Mallard told Becca Vandb that her interest in the chemtrail conspiracy – which holds that some contrails emitted by commercial and military aircraft are in fact part of clandestine geoengineering programs – was a radical view because “99% of people would know those are just contrails.”
Vandb said that the inquiry was triggered after she raised the subject of chemtrails during a visit to her daughter’s school and was immediately told to leave the premises.

“I can now only see my daughter with a social security worker standing over me taking notes, and the judge said this was so that if I mention chemtrails they would put a stop to that. I am being railroaded for expressing my views about chemtrails,” wrote Vandb, adding that she had not received any CPS visits nor were there any allegations of child abuse made by the court or her daughter’s school.
According to Judge Mallard, Vandb being “immersed in a fringe subculture” means “she is a danger to her daughter.”
“The school helped him take away custody because I had the gall to argue with them when they severely embellished my comments (made to adults only) about chemtrails,” Vandb told YourNewsWire.
Vandb’s Facebook page features numerous posts about chemtrails and other conspiracies.
Whether you believe in the reality of chemtrails or not, the notion that the state can order someone’s child to be seized because of their private beliefs – with no evidence whatsoever of actual child abuse – is chilling.
What’s next? Taking people’s kids because they don’t agree with the “consensus” on man-made global warming?
Last year we reported on the Naughler family, who had their 10 children seized by police because of concerns over their off-grid, traditional lifestyle.
We also previously highlighted the case of a father who was harassed by Child Protective Services because he chose to only give his children organic food and refused to let them drink unfiltered tap water.
Allowing the state to characterize holding certain harmless beliefs or living completely legal lifestyles as a form of child abuse is an incredibly dangerous precedent and should be opposed at every turn.

http://www.infowars.com/judge-orders-mothers-child-to-be-snatched-because-she-believes-in-chemtrails/

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

12 Responses to “Chemtrails belief is a danger to children – judge.”

  1. UglyTruth says:

    Evidence of Coal-Fly-Ash Toxic Chemical Geoengineering in the Troposphere: Consequences for Public Health
    J. Marvin Herndon

    Abstract: The widespread, intentional and increasingly frequent chemical emplacement in the troposphere has gone unidentified and unremarked in the scientific literature for years. The author presents evidence that toxic coal combustion fly ash is the most likely aerosolized particulate sprayed by tanker-jets for geoengineering, weather-modification and climate-modification purposes and describes some of the multifold consequences on public health.

    http://forum.clonehost.net/topic/12/chemtrails

  2. Dublinmick says:

    Such coal fly ash will even lead hapless victims to believe the Boston bombing and Sandy Hook were real. 🙂

    Ugly truth =no truth hence forward.

  3. Dublinmick says:

    Such views place one in the never neverland of unreality of Alex Jones forever and ever to never be believed again.

    • dkblue says:

      ‘Supreme among the evidence for the smoke and mirrors in the skies above and in halls of Washington is the work of Dr. J. Marvin Herndon, an American interdisciplinary scientist who earned his bachelor of arts degree in physics in 1970 from the University of California, San Diego, and his Ph.D. in nuclear chemistry in 1974 from Texas A&M University.

      Herndon wrote an article that was reviewed and published on Aug. 11, 2015, in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, titled, “Evidence of Coal-Fly-Ash Toxic Chemical Geoengineering in the Troposphere: Consequences for Public Health.” Again, the abstract from the article says it all:

      The widespread, intentional and increasingly frequent chemical emplacement in the troposphere has gone unidentified and unremarked in the scientific literature for years. The author presents evidence that toxic coal combustion fly ash is the most likely aerosolized particulate sprayed by tanker-jets for geoengineering, weather-modification and climate-modification purposes and describes some of the multifold consequences on public health. Two methods are employed: (1) Comparison of 8 elements analyzed in rainwater, leached from aerosolized particulates, with corresponding elements leached into water from coal fly ash in published laboratory experiments, and (2) Comparison of 14 elements analyzed in dust collected outdoors on a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter with corresponding elements analyzed in un-leached coal fly ash material. The results show: (1) the assemblage of elements in rainwater and in the corresponding experimental leachate are essentially identical. At a 99% confidence interval, they have identical means (T-test) and identical variances (F-test); and (2) the assemblage of elements in the HEPA dust and in the corresponding average un-leached coal fly ash are likewise essentially identical. The consequences on public health are profound, including exposure to a variety of toxic heavy metals, radioactive elements, and neurologically-implicated chemically mobile aluminum released by body moisture in situ after inhalation or through transdermal induction.

      Interestingly, on Sept. 2, 2015, just two weeks after it was published, Dr. Herndon’s entire 16-page scientific article was suddenly and completely retracted from the journal based upon only two chemical composition questions and an overarching explanation with no further explanation than this: “The language of the paper is often not sufficiently scientifically objective for a research article.”

      Really?’

      Geoengineeringwatch.org
      Chuck Norris speaks out on the issue again. Bravo

  4. Dublinmick says:

    This ugly truth is what I am referring to.

    https://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/

  5. Dogman says:

    3785557 – January 15, 1974 – Cloud Seeding System
    3795626 – March 5, 1974 – Weather Modification Process
    4141274 – February 27, 1979 – Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser
    4167008 – September 4, 1979 – Fluid bed chaff dispenser
    4999637 – March 12, 1991 – Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth
    0056705 A1 – March 17, 2005 – Weather Modification by Royal Rainmaking Technology
    7,645,326 – January 12, 2010 – RFID environmental manipulation
    8,079,545 – December 20, 2011 – Ground based Manipulation and Control of Aerial Vehicle during non-flying operations

    http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/

  6. Dogman says:

    NOAA Spreadsheets Listing Ongoing Weather Modification Programs in the United States

    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition. … 7_2011.pdf

    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition. … WXMOD5.pdf

    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition. … WXMOD5.pdf

    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition. … WXMOD5.pdf

    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition. … WXMOD5.pdf

    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition. … WXMOD5.pdf

    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition. … WXMOD5.pdf

    ———————————————————————————————————–
    http://www.agriculturedefensecoalition. … dification

  7. Dogman says:

    This and the previous comment were sent to the Spivey forum by somebody known as “angryhead”
    From ‘The Royal Society’ (The UK national academy of science):

    2009:
    https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_ … 9/8693.pdf

    2010:
    http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/Roy … gramme.pdf

  8. Dogman says:

    That judge is either corrupt (probable) or to lazy to do the research. Part of the move to make establishment viewpoints unquestionable.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.